학자들과 정책담당자들은 시민참여에 대하여 많은 관심을 가져왔지만 시민참여가 지역의 성과에 미치는 영향을 체계적으로 조사한 연구는 드문 편이다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 본 ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106347976
2019
English
Citizen participation ; direct democracy ; efficiency ; effectiveness ; equity ; 시민참여 ; 직접민주주의 ; 효율성 ; 효과성 ; 형평성
KCI등재
학술저널
223-244(22쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
학자들과 정책담당자들은 시민참여에 대하여 많은 관심을 가져왔지만 시민참여가 지역의 성과에 미치는 영향을 체계적으로 조사한 연구는 드문 편이다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 본 ...
학자들과 정책담당자들은 시민참여에 대하여 많은 관심을 가져왔지만 시민참여가 지역의 성과에 미치는 영향을 체계적으로 조사한 연구는 드문 편이다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 본 연구는 직접민주주의 참여제도부터 단순 정보제공 참여채널까지 다양한 시민참여 방식을 개념화 한다. 이러한 개념화를 통해 참여채널 간의 상호관계를 분석하고, 여러 참여채널이 지역의 다양한 성과에 미치는 영향을 통계적으로 분석한다. 통계분석과 결과 직접 민주주의 참여제도를 가지고 있는 지방정부일수록 다양한 시민참여 프로그램을 운영하고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 또한, 다양한 시민참여 프로그램을 운영하는 지방자치단체는 지역의 성과를 효율적으로 달성하지는 않지만 지역성과의 효과성과 형평성을 높이는 것으로 나타났다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Either scholars or practitioners have paid much attention to citizen participation in policy decision-making due to participatory benefits. Despite these benefits, prior studies have not examined the substantial effects of citizen participation mechan...
Either scholars or practitioners have paid much attention to citizen participation in policy decision-making due to participatory benefits. Despite these benefits, prior studies have not examined the substantial effects of citizen participation mechanisms on local community outcomes. This study conceptualizes a variety of participation mechanisms from direct democracy provisions to informational participatory tools. It investigates that these mechanisms are mutually related to each other by producing multiple community outcomes. The results show that direct democracy provisions are connected to administrative participation mechanisms that produce effective and equitable community outcomes.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Stewart, K, "Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics" 67 (67): 1067-1076, 2007
2 Wang, X, "When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions" 67 (67): 265-278, 2007
3 Verba, S, "Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics" Havard University 1995
4 Ammar Salwa, "Using Fuzzy Rule–Based Systems to Evaluate Overall Financial Performance of Governments" 21 : 91-110, 2001
5 Ostrom, E, "Understanding Institutional Diversity" Princeton University Press 2005
6 Baron, R. M, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986
7 King, C. S, "The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration" 58 (58): 317-326, 1998
8 Cole, R..L, "The Public hearing as an effective citizen participation mechanism" 78 (78): 404-416, 1984
9 Gerber, E, "The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and The Promise of Direct Legislation" Princeton University Press 1999
10 Williamson, "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead" 38 (38): 595-613, 2000
1 Stewart, K, "Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics" 67 (67): 1067-1076, 2007
2 Wang, X, "When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions" 67 (67): 265-278, 2007
3 Verba, S, "Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics" Havard University 1995
4 Ammar Salwa, "Using Fuzzy Rule–Based Systems to Evaluate Overall Financial Performance of Governments" 21 : 91-110, 2001
5 Ostrom, E, "Understanding Institutional Diversity" Princeton University Press 2005
6 Baron, R. M, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986
7 King, C. S, "The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration" 58 (58): 317-326, 1998
8 Cole, R..L, "The Public hearing as an effective citizen participation mechanism" 78 (78): 404-416, 1984
9 Gerber, E, "The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and The Promise of Direct Legislation" Princeton University Press 1999
10 Williamson, "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead" 38 (38): 595-613, 2000
11 Tolbert. C. J, "The Educational Effects of Ballot Initiative on Voter Turnout" 33 (33): 283-309, 2005
12 Smith, M, "The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout" 45 (45): 700-706, 2001
13 Ebdon C, "Searching for a Role for Citizens in the Budget Process" 24 : 32-49, 2004
14 Behn, R, "Rethinking Democratic Accountability" Brookings Institution 2001
15 Walters, L, "Putting More Public in Policy Analysis" 60 (60): 349-359, 2000
16 Vigoda-E, "Public sector management and the democratic ethos: A 5-year study of key relationships in Israel" 18 : 79-107, 2008
17 Yang, K, "Public administrators’ Trust in Citizens: A Missing Link in Citizen Involvement Efforts" 65 (65): 273-285, 2005
18 Neshkova, M I, "Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies" 22 : 267-288, 2012
19 Thomas, J, "Public Involvement in Public Management: Adapting and Testing a Borrowed Theory" 50 (50): 435-445, 1990
20 Roberts, N, "Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation" 34 : 315-351, 2004
21 Fung, A, "Public Administration Review Special issue on collaborative public management" 66-75, 2006
22 Berman E, "Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform" 60 : 409-420, 2000
23 Poister, S, "Performance Measurement in Local government Government: Assessing the State of the Practice" 59 (59): 325-335, 1999
24 Moynihan, D. P, "Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation" 33 : 164-188, 2003
25 Avellaneda, C, "Local government Performance: Does Mayoral Quality Matter" 19 : 285-312, 2009
26 Oh Y, "International Review of Administrative Sciences" 2017
27 Kweit, M. G, "Implementing Citizen Participation in a Bureaucratic Society: A Contingency Approach" Praeger 1981
28 Wheeland, C. M, "Implementing A Community-Wide Strategic Plan : Rock Hill's Empowering the Vision 10 Years Later" 33 : 46-69, 2003
29 Wagenarr, H, "Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighborhood Decline" 37 : 17-50, 2007
30 Kathlene, L, "Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation" 10 : 46-63, 1991
31 Tolbert, Ca. J, "Enhancing Civic Engagement : The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge" 3 (3): 23-41, 2003
32 Andrews, R, "Does Cross-Sectoral Partnership Deliver? An Empirical Exploration of Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity" 20 : 679-701, 2010
33 Donovan, T, "Direct democracy and minority rights: an extension" 1020-1024, 1998
34 Ellis, R, "Democratic Delusion: The initiative process in America" University Press of Kansas 2002
35 Nabatchi T, "Democracy for Public Administration Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative" 40 (40): 376-399, 2010
36 Dahl, R.A, "Democracy and its critics" Yale Univ. Press 1989
37 Baker, W. H, "Critical Factors for Enhancing Municipal Public Hearings" 65 (65): 490-499, 2005
38 Maser, S. M, "Constitutions as relational contracts explaining procedural safeguards in local government charters" 8 : 527-564, 1998
39 Ho, A. C, "Citizen Participation: Legitimizing Performance Measurement as a Decision Tool" 18 (18): 8-11, 2002
40 Irvin, R. A, "Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is Worth the Effort" 64 (64): 55-65, 2004
41 Ebdon C, "Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory" 66 (66): 437-447, 2006
42 Woolum, J, "Citizen Involvement in Performance Measurement and Reporting A comparative case study from local government" 35 : 79-112, 2011
43 Wang, X, "Assessing the Costs of Public Participation A Case Study of Two Online Participation Mechanisms" 43 (43): 179-199, 2013
44 Wang, X, "Assessing Public Participation in U.S. cities" 24 (24): 322-336, 2001
45 Yang, K, "Assessing Citizen Involvement Efforts by Local Governments" 29 (29): 191-216,
46 Vigoda, E, "Administrative Agents of Democracy? A Structural Equation Modeling of the Relationship between Public-Sector Performance and Citizenship Involvement" 12 : 241-272, 2002
47 Brady H. E, "A Resource Model of Political Participation" 89 (89): 271-294, 1995
48 Arnstein, S., R, "A Ladder of Citizen Participation" 35 (35): 216-224, 1969
To Be Ambiguous or Not at All?: The Moderating Effect of Drug Felony on Fraud in the U.S. SNAP
What Determines Cultural Expenditures in Local Chinese Governments in Liaoning?
다른 시민활동과의 관계에 따른 자원봉사참여 유형화와 영향·결과변수 검증에 대한 연구
젠더거버넌스 실현의 정책적 시사점과 과제: 울산광역시를 중심으로
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2000-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 1.23 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.34 | 1.4 | 1.372 | 0.54 |