RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      How Does Citizen Participation Influence Local Community Outcomes?: Exploring Impacts of Various Participation Mechanisms on Multiple Community Outcomes in Terms of Competing Values

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106347976

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      학자들과 정책담당자들은 시민참여에 대하여 많은 관심을 가져왔지만 시민참여가 지역의 성과에 미치는 영향을 체계적으로 조사한 연구는 드문 편이다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 본 연구는 직접민주주의 참여제도부터 단순 정보제공 참여채널까지 다양한 시민참여 방식을 개념화 한다. 이러한 개념화를 통해 참여채널 간의 상호관계를 분석하고, 여러 참여채널이 지역의 다양한 성과에 미치는 영향을 통계적으로 분석한다. 통계분석과 결과 직접 민주주의 참여제도를 가지고 있는 지방정부일수록 다양한 시민참여 프로그램을 운영하고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 또한, 다양한 시민참여 프로그램을 운영하는 지방자치단체는 지역의 성과를 효율적으로 달성하지는 않지만 지역성과의 효과성과 형평성을 높이는 것으로 나타났다.
      번역하기

      학자들과 정책담당자들은 시민참여에 대하여 많은 관심을 가져왔지만 시민참여가 지역의 성과에 미치는 영향을 체계적으로 조사한 연구는 드문 편이다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 본 ...

      학자들과 정책담당자들은 시민참여에 대하여 많은 관심을 가져왔지만 시민참여가 지역의 성과에 미치는 영향을 체계적으로 조사한 연구는 드문 편이다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 본 연구는 직접민주주의 참여제도부터 단순 정보제공 참여채널까지 다양한 시민참여 방식을 개념화 한다. 이러한 개념화를 통해 참여채널 간의 상호관계를 분석하고, 여러 참여채널이 지역의 다양한 성과에 미치는 영향을 통계적으로 분석한다. 통계분석과 결과 직접 민주주의 참여제도를 가지고 있는 지방정부일수록 다양한 시민참여 프로그램을 운영하고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 또한, 다양한 시민참여 프로그램을 운영하는 지방자치단체는 지역의 성과를 효율적으로 달성하지는 않지만 지역성과의 효과성과 형평성을 높이는 것으로 나타났다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Either scholars or practitioners have paid much attention to citizen participation in policy decision-making due to participatory benefits. Despite these benefits, prior studies have not examined the substantial effects of citizen participation mechanisms on local community outcomes. This study conceptualizes a variety of participation mechanisms from direct democracy provisions to informational participatory tools. It investigates that these mechanisms are mutually related to each other by producing multiple community outcomes. The results show that direct democracy provisions are connected to administrative participation mechanisms that produce effective and equitable community outcomes.
      번역하기

      Either scholars or practitioners have paid much attention to citizen participation in policy decision-making due to participatory benefits. Despite these benefits, prior studies have not examined the substantial effects of citizen participation mechan...

      Either scholars or practitioners have paid much attention to citizen participation in policy decision-making due to participatory benefits. Despite these benefits, prior studies have not examined the substantial effects of citizen participation mechanisms on local community outcomes. This study conceptualizes a variety of participation mechanisms from direct democracy provisions to informational participatory tools. It investigates that these mechanisms are mutually related to each other by producing multiple community outcomes. The results show that direct democracy provisions are connected to administrative participation mechanisms that produce effective and equitable community outcomes.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Institutional Perspective: Different Participation Mechanisms
      • Ⅲ. Hypotheses: Different Participation Mechanisms and Community Outcomes
      • Ⅳ. Research Design
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Institutional Perspective: Different Participation Mechanisms
      • Ⅲ. Hypotheses: Different Participation Mechanisms and Community Outcomes
      • Ⅳ. Research Design
      • Ⅴ. Statistical Findings
      • Ⅵ. Conclusions and Implications
      • References
      • 국문요약
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Stewart, K, "Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics" 67 (67): 1067-1076, 2007

      2 Wang, X, "When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions" 67 (67): 265-278, 2007

      3 Verba, S, "Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics" Havard University 1995

      4 Ammar Salwa, "Using Fuzzy Rule–Based Systems to Evaluate Overall Financial Performance of Governments" 21 : 91-110, 2001

      5 Ostrom, E, "Understanding Institutional Diversity" Princeton University Press 2005

      6 Baron, R. M, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

      7 King, C. S, "The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration" 58 (58): 317-326, 1998

      8 Cole, R..L, "The Public hearing as an effective citizen participation mechanism" 78 (78): 404-416, 1984

      9 Gerber, E, "The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and The Promise of Direct Legislation" Princeton University Press 1999

      10 Williamson, "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead" 38 (38): 595-613, 2000

      1 Stewart, K, "Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics" 67 (67): 1067-1076, 2007

      2 Wang, X, "When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions" 67 (67): 265-278, 2007

      3 Verba, S, "Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics" Havard University 1995

      4 Ammar Salwa, "Using Fuzzy Rule–Based Systems to Evaluate Overall Financial Performance of Governments" 21 : 91-110, 2001

      5 Ostrom, E, "Understanding Institutional Diversity" Princeton University Press 2005

      6 Baron, R. M, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

      7 King, C. S, "The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration" 58 (58): 317-326, 1998

      8 Cole, R..L, "The Public hearing as an effective citizen participation mechanism" 78 (78): 404-416, 1984

      9 Gerber, E, "The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and The Promise of Direct Legislation" Princeton University Press 1999

      10 Williamson, "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead" 38 (38): 595-613, 2000

      11 Tolbert. C. J, "The Educational Effects of Ballot Initiative on Voter Turnout" 33 (33): 283-309, 2005

      12 Smith, M, "The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout" 45 (45): 700-706, 2001

      13 Ebdon C, "Searching for a Role for Citizens in the Budget Process" 24 : 32-49, 2004

      14 Behn, R, "Rethinking Democratic Accountability" Brookings Institution 2001

      15 Walters, L, "Putting More Public in Policy Analysis" 60 (60): 349-359, 2000

      16 Vigoda-E, "Public sector management and the democratic ethos: A 5-year study of key relationships in Israel" 18 : 79-107, 2008

      17 Yang, K, "Public administrators’ Trust in Citizens: A Missing Link in Citizen Involvement Efforts" 65 (65): 273-285, 2005

      18 Neshkova, M I, "Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies" 22 : 267-288, 2012

      19 Thomas, J, "Public Involvement in Public Management: Adapting and Testing a Borrowed Theory" 50 (50): 435-445, 1990

      20 Roberts, N, "Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation" 34 : 315-351, 2004

      21 Fung, A, "Public Administration Review Special issue on collaborative public management" 66-75, 2006

      22 Berman E, "Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform" 60 : 409-420, 2000

      23 Poister, S, "Performance Measurement in Local government Government: Assessing the State of the Practice" 59 (59): 325-335, 1999

      24 Moynihan, D. P, "Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation" 33 : 164-188, 2003

      25 Avellaneda, C, "Local government Performance: Does Mayoral Quality Matter" 19 : 285-312, 2009

      26 Oh Y, "International Review of Administrative Sciences" 2017

      27 Kweit, M. G, "Implementing Citizen Participation in a Bureaucratic Society: A Contingency Approach" Praeger 1981

      28 Wheeland, C. M, "Implementing A Community-Wide Strategic Plan : Rock Hill's Empowering the Vision 10 Years Later" 33 : 46-69, 2003

      29 Wagenarr, H, "Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighborhood Decline" 37 : 17-50, 2007

      30 Kathlene, L, "Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation" 10 : 46-63, 1991

      31 Tolbert, Ca. J, "Enhancing Civic Engagement : The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge" 3 (3): 23-41, 2003

      32 Andrews, R, "Does Cross-Sectoral Partnership Deliver? An Empirical Exploration of Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity" 20 : 679-701, 2010

      33 Donovan, T, "Direct democracy and minority rights: an extension" 1020-1024, 1998

      34 Ellis, R, "Democratic Delusion: The initiative process in America" University Press of Kansas 2002

      35 Nabatchi T, "Democracy for Public Administration Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative" 40 (40): 376-399, 2010

      36 Dahl, R.A, "Democracy and its critics" Yale Univ. Press 1989

      37 Baker, W. H, "Critical Factors for Enhancing Municipal Public Hearings" 65 (65): 490-499, 2005

      38 Maser, S. M, "Constitutions as relational contracts explaining procedural safeguards in local government charters" 8 : 527-564, 1998

      39 Ho, A. C, "Citizen Participation: Legitimizing Performance Measurement as a Decision Tool" 18 (18): 8-11, 2002

      40 Irvin, R. A, "Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is Worth the Effort" 64 (64): 55-65, 2004

      41 Ebdon C, "Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory" 66 (66): 437-447, 2006

      42 Woolum, J, "Citizen Involvement in Performance Measurement and Reporting A comparative case study from local government" 35 : 79-112, 2011

      43 Wang, X, "Assessing the Costs of Public Participation A Case Study of Two Online Participation Mechanisms" 43 (43): 179-199, 2013

      44 Wang, X, "Assessing Public Participation in U.S. cities" 24 (24): 322-336, 2001

      45 Yang, K, "Assessing Citizen Involvement Efforts by Local Governments" 29 (29): 191-216,

      46 Vigoda, E, "Administrative Agents of Democracy? A Structural Equation Modeling of the Relationship between Public-Sector Performance and Citizenship Involvement" 12 : 241-272, 2002

      47 Brady H. E, "A Resource Model of Political Participation" 89 (89): 271-294, 1995

      48 Arnstein, S., R, "A Ladder of Citizen Participation" 35 (35): 216-224, 1969

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.27 1.27 1.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.34 1.4 1.372 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼