RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    타갈로그어의 유형론적 논점들에 대하여 = On Typological Issues of the Tagalog Language

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106011664

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Song, Kyung-An & Lee, Eun-Ha. (2018). On typological issues of the Tagalog language. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(4), 177-201. The purpose of this paper is to explore typological issues and characteristics of the Tagalog language through which we would like to contribute to the typological discussion of this language in Korea. Tagalog is one of the frequently cited and discussed languages in modern studies of typology. Important issues thereby include ergativity,subject- hood, basic word order, and voice, which are closely related to one another. Because of the characteristic features of this language, a new linguistic term was invented, i.e. ‘the Philippine type clause,’ indicating the difficulties in finding a clear solution to the issues. In this paper we examine these issues on the basis of the language data we collected through interviews with a native speaker of Tagalog. Through our analysis of this data, we reached the conclusion that Tagalog could basically be considered an ergative language with the VSO basic word order, and a rich voice system. Beside this, the ‘copula’ construction, the distinction between nouns and verbs, the development of articles, the tense system, and the relative prominence of aspect are also important typological issues of the Tagalog language. No copula or copula-like element is attested in this language. Contrary to previous discussions such as those by Himmelmann (1987) and Sasse (1993), there seems to be a clear-cut distinction between nouns and verbs in Tagalog: only the verbs are conjugated, but not the nouns. It is also noteworthy that Tagalog has no tense system and it is an aspect-prominent language, i.e. the aspect is generally realized in sentences, unlike the tense and mood.
    번역하기

    Song, Kyung-An & Lee, Eun-Ha. (2018). On typological issues of the Tagalog language. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(4), 177-201. The purpose of this paper is to explore typological issues and characteristics of the Tagalog language th...

    Song, Kyung-An & Lee, Eun-Ha. (2018). On typological issues of the Tagalog language. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(4), 177-201. The purpose of this paper is to explore typological issues and characteristics of the Tagalog language through which we would like to contribute to the typological discussion of this language in Korea. Tagalog is one of the frequently cited and discussed languages in modern studies of typology. Important issues thereby include ergativity,subject- hood, basic word order, and voice, which are closely related to one another. Because of the characteristic features of this language, a new linguistic term was invented, i.e. ‘the Philippine type clause,’ indicating the difficulties in finding a clear solution to the issues. In this paper we examine these issues on the basis of the language data we collected through interviews with a native speaker of Tagalog. Through our analysis of this data, we reached the conclusion that Tagalog could basically be considered an ergative language with the VSO basic word order, and a rich voice system. Beside this, the ‘copula’ construction, the distinction between nouns and verbs, the development of articles, the tense system, and the relative prominence of aspect are also important typological issues of the Tagalog language. No copula or copula-like element is attested in this language. Contrary to previous discussions such as those by Himmelmann (1987) and Sasse (1993), there seems to be a clear-cut distinction between nouns and verbs in Tagalog: only the verbs are conjugated, but not the nouns. It is also noteworthy that Tagalog has no tense system and it is an aspect-prominent language, i.e. the aspect is generally realized in sentences, unlike the tense and mood.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 윤경원, "한국어와 타갈로그어(Tagalog) 대조 연구 - 형태론적 특징과 어순을 중심으로 -" 겨레어문학회 (48) : 301-326, 2012

    2 風間喜代三, "언어학" 제이엔씨 2013

    3 송경안, "언어유형론1" 월인출판사 2008

    4 송경안, "언어유형론 2" 월인출판사 2008

    5 정규영, "언어유형론 1" 월인출판사 146-157, 2008

    6 허성태, "언어 유형론 1" 월인출판사 134-145, 2008

    7 송경안, "독일어의 새로운 이해" 신아사 2011

    8 Hawkins, J., "Word order universals" Academic Press 1983

    9 Churchward, C. M., "Tongan grammar" Oxford University Press 1953

    10 Comrie, B., "The world atlas of language structures 23" Oxford University Press 2018

    1 윤경원, "한국어와 타갈로그어(Tagalog) 대조 연구 - 형태론적 특징과 어순을 중심으로 -" 겨레어문학회 (48) : 301-326, 2012

    2 風間喜代三, "언어학" 제이엔씨 2013

    3 송경안, "언어유형론1" 월인출판사 2008

    4 송경안, "언어유형론 2" 월인출판사 2008

    5 정규영, "언어유형론 1" 월인출판사 146-157, 2008

    6 허성태, "언어 유형론 1" 월인출판사 134-145, 2008

    7 송경안, "독일어의 새로운 이해" 신아사 2011

    8 Hawkins, J., "Word order universals" Academic Press 1983

    9 Churchward, C. M., "Tongan grammar" Oxford University Press 1953

    10 Comrie, B., "The world atlas of language structures 23" Oxford University Press 2018

    11 Siewierska, A., "The world atlas of language structures" Oxford University Press 434-437, 2005

    12 Dryer, M., "The world atlas of language structures" Oxford University Press 2018

    13 Dryer, M., "The world atlas of language structures" Oxford University Press 37-, 2018

    14 Dryer, M., "The world atlas of language structures" Oxford University Press 330-333, 2018

    15 Schachter, P., "The subject in Tagalog: still none of the above" University of California Press 1996

    16 Siewierska, A., "The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis" Croom Helm 1984

    17 Bhat, S. D. N., "The Prominence of tense, aspect and mood" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1999

    18 Bisang, W., "The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology" Oxford University 280-302, 2011

    19 Palancar, E., "The Oxford handbook of case" Oxford University Press 562-571, 2009

    20 Comrie, B., "Tense" Cambridge University Press 1985

    21 Schachter, P., "Tagalog reference grammar" University of California Press 1972

    22 Sasse, H. -J., "Syntax: An international handbook" Walter de Gruyter 646-685, 1993

    23 Schachter, P., "Syntax and semantics. Vol. 8" Academic Press 279-306, 1977

    24 Schachter, P., "Subject and topic" Academic Press 491-518, 1976

    25 Li, C., "Subject and topic" Academic Press 457-490, 1976

    26 Perlmutter, D. M., "Studies in relational grammar" University of Chicago Press 1129-, 1983

    27 Gerdts, D., "Studies in Austronesian linguistics" Ohio University Press 295-321, 1988

    28 Payne, T., "Role and reference related subject properties and ergativity in Yup’ik Eskimo and Tagalog" 6 (6): 75-106, 1982

    29 Kroeger, P., "Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog" CSLI Publications 1993

    30 Himmelmann, Jr., N., "Morphosyntax und Morphologie - Die Ausrichtungsaffixe im Tagalog" Wilhelm Fink 1987

    31 Baker, M., "Lexical categories" Cambridge University Press 2003

    32 Schachter, P., "Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1" Cam-bridge University Press 3-61, 1985

    33 Keenan, E., "Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1" Cambridge University Press 325-361, 2007

    34 Dryer, M., "Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1" Cambridge University Press 161-131, 2007

    35 Andrew, A., "Language tpology and syntactic description. Vol. 1" Cambridge University Press 132-223, 2007

    36 De Vos, F., "Essential Tagalog grammar: A reference for learners of Tagalog" Learning Tagalog 2011

    37 Dixon, D. M. W., "Ergativity" Cambridge University Press 1994

    38 Plank, F., "Ergativity" Academic Press 1979

    39 Pustet, R., "Copulas: Universals in the categorization of the lexicon" Oxford University Press 2003

    40 Ramos, T., "Conversational Tagalog" University of Hawaii Press 1985

    41 Press. Blake, B., "Case" Cambridge University Press 1994

    42 Aspillera, P. S., "Basic Tagalog for foreigners and non-Tagalogs" Tuttle Publishing 2014

    43 Rijkhoff, J., "Approaches to the typology of word classes" Walter de Gruyter 217-257, 2000

    44 Gil, D., "Approaches to the typology of word classes" Walter de Gruyter 173-216, 2000

    45 Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" Longman 1985

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2017-03-14 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Linguistic Association of Korea KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.33 0.33 0.32
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.32 0.32 0.704 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼