양 방향 강세 시스템(Bidirectional Stress Systems)의 재고 = Bidirectional Stress Systems Revisited

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Cho, Hye-Sung. (2018). Bidirectional stress systems revisited. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(4), 203-223. Bidirectional stress systems characteristically have their stress work to demarcate both edges of a word as well as to embody the rhythmic patterns within the word. Unlike unidirectional stress systems involving forming feet from either end of a word, bidirectional systems start building one foot from one edge and the remaining feet from the opposite edge. As a result, over ternary stress configurations bidirectional systems incur lapses in word-medial positions. In this paper I offer a reexamination of bidirectional systems within standard alignment theory (McCarthy & Prince 1993), but whose inherent symmetry is partially suppressed to accommodate their typological iambic-trochaic asymmetry. I contend that the interaction between asymmetrical ALIGN-WD constraints and symmetrical, foot-forming ALL-FT-L/R constraints not only makes the correct typological prediction, ruling out iambic rhythms from the bidirectional inventory but also provides an adequate account of the bidirectionality’s demarcative and rhythmic stress properties. I also argue that although they have mixed directionality orientation, bidirectional systems with a word-final three syllable stress window, such as English and Spanish be on the list of unidirectionality since they consistently maintain final lapse rather than medial lapse.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조혜성, "단어 말 두 음절의 강세 유형과 NONFINALITY 제약의 상관관계" 대한언어학회 25 (25): 167-191, 2017

2 McCarthy, J., "Yearbook of Morphology" 79-153, 1993

3 Prince, A. S., "Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar" Blackwell 2004

4 Kahn, D., "Syllable-based generalizations in English phonolog" MIT 1976

5 Withgott, M. M., "Segmental evidence for phonological constituents" University of Texas 1983

6 Kager, R., "Rhythmic directionality by positional licensing" University of Potsdam 2001

7 Prince, A. S., "Relating to the grid" 14 (14): 19-100, 1983

8 Davis, S., "Paradigms in phonological theory" Oxford University Press 107-121, 2005

9 Steriade, D., "Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 5" CUP 313-334, 2000

10 Buckley, E., "Optimal iambs in Kashaya" 9 : 9-52, 1997

11 McCarthy, J., "OT constraints are categorical" 20 : 75-138, 2003

12 Hayes, B., "Metrical Stress Theory : Principles and Case Studies" University of Chicago Press 1995

13 Miller, W., "Handbook of American Indian Languages 17" Smithsonian Institute 693-720, 1996

14 Alber, B., "Clash, lapse and directionality" 23 : 485-542, 2004

15 Hyde, B., "Bidirectional stress systems" 270-278, 2008

16 Jensen, J. T., "Against Ambisyllabicity" 17 (17): 187-235, 2000

17 MacDonald, L., "A grammar of Tauya" Mouton de Gruyter 1990