RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Causality between Economic Sanctions and Militarized Conflict: A Global Level Analysis, 1945-2014

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108488246

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Sanctions and militarized disputes remain two of the most acute forms of interstate hostilities that may destabilize the contemporary interstate system. Although scholars and policy makers have discussed the potential reciprocal relationship between sanctions and conflict, extant theoretical and empirical examinations remain unsatisfactory. Their theoretical arguments are cursory and their empirical evidence is scant. How do sanctions and militarized disputes affect each other? Do more economic hostilities in the world suggest more military hostilities in the world, and vice versa? This study arranges a set of theoretical arguments for the possible causality. Using a VAR-Granger causality test method, it assesses the two-way causality at the macro-global system level for the 1945-2014 period. It also divides the entire data into the Cold War and post-Cold War samples to address a structural break. The results show that sanctions promote militarized disputes but this impact is limited to the post-Cold War era. The impact of military conflict on sanctions is insignificant with the pooled 1945-2014 sample. However, the divided samples reveal the contrasting double-faced effects for militarized disputes promoting sanctions in the Cold War era but discouraging sanctions in the post-Cold War era.
      번역하기

      Sanctions and militarized disputes remain two of the most acute forms of interstate hostilities that may destabilize the contemporary interstate system. Although scholars and policy makers have discussed the potential reciprocal relationship between s...

      Sanctions and militarized disputes remain two of the most acute forms of interstate hostilities that may destabilize the contemporary interstate system. Although scholars and policy makers have discussed the potential reciprocal relationship between sanctions and conflict, extant theoretical and empirical examinations remain unsatisfactory. Their theoretical arguments are cursory and their empirical evidence is scant. How do sanctions and militarized disputes affect each other? Do more economic hostilities in the world suggest more military hostilities in the world, and vice versa? This study arranges a set of theoretical arguments for the possible causality. Using a VAR-Granger causality test method, it assesses the two-way causality at the macro-global system level for the 1945-2014 period. It also divides the entire data into the Cold War and post-Cold War samples to address a structural break. The results show that sanctions promote militarized disputes but this impact is limited to the post-Cold War era. The impact of military conflict on sanctions is insignificant with the pooled 1945-2014 sample. However, the divided samples reveal the contrasting double-faced effects for militarized disputes promoting sanctions in the Cold War era but discouraging sanctions in the post-Cold War era.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Literature Review
      • 3. Research Design
      • 4. Empirical Results
      • 5. Conclusion
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Literature Review
      • 3. Research Design
      • 4. Empirical Results
      • 5. Conclusion
      • References
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼