RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      에너지 절감형 업무용 건물의 에너지 성능 측정 및 검증에 관한 사례 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100319868

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study was to verify energy performance which was satisfying energy reduction target in design stage. Objective of building was called ‘POSCO Green building’ and was located in Yonsei International Campus, Songdo, Incheon, South Korea. Many green technologies were applied to Office Spaces which had been designed 60%, 80% energy reduction rate. 80% energy reduction zone was 50% saved more than 60% energy reduction zone in daily energy consumption comparison. Also, 80% energy reduction zone was 33% saved more than 60% energy reduction zone in weekly energy consumption comparison. Predicting energy consumption in winter season using for Regression Model, 80% energy reduction zone was saved 30% more than 60% energy reduction zone. However Energy consumption in field measurement was little more than energy reduction target in design stage.
      번역하기

      This study was to verify energy performance which was satisfying energy reduction target in design stage. Objective of building was called ‘POSCO Green building’ and was located in Yonsei International Campus, Songdo, Incheon, South Korea. Many gr...

      This study was to verify energy performance which was satisfying energy reduction target in design stage. Objective of building was called ‘POSCO Green building’ and was located in Yonsei International Campus, Songdo, Incheon, South Korea. Many green technologies were applied to Office Spaces which had been designed 60%, 80% energy reduction rate. 80% energy reduction zone was 50% saved more than 60% energy reduction zone in daily energy consumption comparison. Also, 80% energy reduction zone was 33% saved more than 60% energy reduction zone in weekly energy consumption comparison. Predicting energy consumption in winter season using for Regression Model, 80% energy reduction zone was saved 30% more than 60% energy reduction zone. However Energy consumption in field measurement was little more than energy reduction target in design stage.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 대상 건물 개요
      • 3. 측정 및 분석
      • 4. 에너지 소비량 검증
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 대상 건물 개요
      • 3. 측정 및 분석
      • 4. 에너지 소비량 검증
      • 5. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 국토교통부, "산업통상자원부, 건축물 에너지효율등급 인증 기준"

      2 Chicago Center for Green Technology, "건물 사례에서의 실측과 검증을 통한 에너지 소비량 및 친환경 건물 관리에 관한 연구"

      3 "Case Study : Capuano Early Childhood Center, Massachusetts Technology Collaborative"

      4 R. Vollaro, C, "Building energy performance analysis: A case study"

      5 M. Deru, "Analysis for the design and energy performance of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Cambria Office Building" National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2005

      6 I. Iqbal, M.S, "Al-Homoud, Parameric Analysis of alternative energy conservation measures in an office in hot and humid climate" 42 : 2166-2177, 2007

      7 A. Pedrini, "A mehotodogy for building energy modeling and calibration in warm climates" 4 (4): 903-912, 2002

      1 국토교통부, "산업통상자원부, 건축물 에너지효율등급 인증 기준"

      2 Chicago Center for Green Technology, "건물 사례에서의 실측과 검증을 통한 에너지 소비량 및 친환경 건물 관리에 관한 연구"

      3 "Case Study : Capuano Early Childhood Center, Massachusetts Technology Collaborative"

      4 R. Vollaro, C, "Building energy performance analysis: A case study"

      5 M. Deru, "Analysis for the design and energy performance of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Cambria Office Building" National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2005

      6 I. Iqbal, M.S, "Al-Homoud, Parameric Analysis of alternative energy conservation measures in an office in hot and humid climate" 42 : 2166-2177, 2007

      7 A. Pedrini, "A mehotodogy for building energy modeling and calibration in warm climates" 4 (4): 903-912, 2002

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계
      외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.4 0.742 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼