RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유럽연합 및 한국의 최적가용기술(BAT) 개념 환경정책 적용 접근법 비교 연구 : 탄소시장의 최적가용기술(BAT) 베이스라인 방법론을 고려하여 = Comparison of European Union and Korean Applications of the Best Available Technology (BAT) Concept to Environmental Policy Areas in Consideration of BAT Baseline Methodology in the Carbon Market

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108052996

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement introduces a baseline-and-crediting mechanism, the so-called sustainable development mechanism (SDM), which allows parties to meet their nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Currently, various options for baseline methodologies are being considered and negotiated as a part of the implementation rules of Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement for greenhouse gas emission reduction projects. The best available technology (BAT) baseline methodology has been increasingly emphasized as an alternative to historical emission, business-as-usual (BAU), and performance-based baseline methodologies. However, the application of the BAT baseline methodology in the international carbon market remains under-explored. Also, the rise of the BAT baseline methodology had attracted attention to the concept of BAT in environmental policies and practices. Therefore, this paper attempts to examine the meaning of the BAT concept and BAT application in related environmental policies to ultimately explore strategic ways that the BAT baseline methodology can be used under the SDM in an integrated manner amongst related policy fields. First, this paper sets three policy areas where the concepts of BAT are applied, and they are the i) integrated pollution and prevention control policy, ii) cap-and-trade policy in the carbon market, and iii) baseline-and-crediting mechanism in the carbon market. Second, a comparative analysis is carried out on BAT application in three respective policy areas of the European Union (EU) and Korea. Analytical results revealed that the EU has strengthened BAT application in three policy areas based on their inter-linkage and accelerated technology innovation in those areas towards the level of BAT. Korea has also attempted to adopt the BAT approach in these three policy areas, but political measures as well as actual BAT practice are still limited. The policy implications of this study are that Korea needs to plan strategies for the use of BAT baseline methodology under the future SDM and also that the interconnections among BAT-related policies in Korea can enhance the efficiency of their implementation.
      번역하기

      Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement introduces a baseline-and-crediting mechanism, the so-called sustainable development mechanism (SDM), which allows parties to meet their nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Currently, various options for base...

      Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement introduces a baseline-and-crediting mechanism, the so-called sustainable development mechanism (SDM), which allows parties to meet their nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Currently, various options for baseline methodologies are being considered and negotiated as a part of the implementation rules of Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement for greenhouse gas emission reduction projects. The best available technology (BAT) baseline methodology has been increasingly emphasized as an alternative to historical emission, business-as-usual (BAU), and performance-based baseline methodologies. However, the application of the BAT baseline methodology in the international carbon market remains under-explored. Also, the rise of the BAT baseline methodology had attracted attention to the concept of BAT in environmental policies and practices. Therefore, this paper attempts to examine the meaning of the BAT concept and BAT application in related environmental policies to ultimately explore strategic ways that the BAT baseline methodology can be used under the SDM in an integrated manner amongst related policy fields. First, this paper sets three policy areas where the concepts of BAT are applied, and they are the i) integrated pollution and prevention control policy, ii) cap-and-trade policy in the carbon market, and iii) baseline-and-crediting mechanism in the carbon market. Second, a comparative analysis is carried out on BAT application in three respective policy areas of the European Union (EU) and Korea. Analytical results revealed that the EU has strengthened BAT application in three policy areas based on their inter-linkage and accelerated technology innovation in those areas towards the level of BAT. Korea has also attempted to adopt the BAT approach in these three policy areas, but political measures as well as actual BAT practice are still limited. The policy implications of this study are that Korea needs to plan strategies for the use of BAT baseline methodology under the future SDM and also that the interconnections among BAT-related policies in Korea can enhance the efficiency of their implementation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신수정 ; 박재홍 ; 박상아 ; 이대균 ; 김대곤, "폐기물 소각시설 최적가용기법 (BAT) 기준서의 이해와 개선방향" 한국대기환경학회 33 (33): 533-543, 2017

      2 박선주 ; 오채운 ; 박순철, "파리협정 제6.4조 지속가능발전메커니즘의 베이스라인 방법론 분석과 우리나라 협상 입장 연구" 한국기후변화학회 10 (10): 381-400, 2019

      3 신수정 ; 박재홍 ; 이대균 ; 김대곤, "전기 및 증기 생산시설 최적가용기법 (BAT) 기준서의 이해와 개선방향" 한국대기환경학회 34 (34): 281-293, 2018

      4 조하현 ; 엄이슬, "온실가스감축을 위한 청정개발체제(CDM): 문제점과 개선방안" 경제연구소 22 (22): 279-294, 2015

      5 서경애 ; 김가희 ; 김은석 ; 석희정 ; 신수정 ; 김영란 ; 강필구, "비료제조업의 국내와 EU 최적가용기법 기준서 비교·분석" 한국환경과학회 29 (29): 307-318, 2020

      6 서경애 ; 김은석 ; 김가희 ; 간종범 ; 홍석영 ; 강필구, "골판지원지 제조업 최적가용기법 기준서의 이해와 개선사항" 한국환경과학회 29 (29): 559-573, 2020

      7 Gillenwater M, "What is Additionality? Part 1: A long standing problem. Discussion Paper No. 001, Ver03" GHG management institute

      8 UNFCCC, "What are Market and Non-Market Mechanisms?"

      9 Hayashi D, "Towards a more standardised approach to baselines and additionality under the CDM"

      10 Roudier S, "The role of BAT conclusions and BREFs in the industrial Emission Directive (IED)"

      1 신수정 ; 박재홍 ; 박상아 ; 이대균 ; 김대곤, "폐기물 소각시설 최적가용기법 (BAT) 기준서의 이해와 개선방향" 한국대기환경학회 33 (33): 533-543, 2017

      2 박선주 ; 오채운 ; 박순철, "파리협정 제6.4조 지속가능발전메커니즘의 베이스라인 방법론 분석과 우리나라 협상 입장 연구" 한국기후변화학회 10 (10): 381-400, 2019

      3 신수정 ; 박재홍 ; 이대균 ; 김대곤, "전기 및 증기 생산시설 최적가용기법 (BAT) 기준서의 이해와 개선방향" 한국대기환경학회 34 (34): 281-293, 2018

      4 조하현 ; 엄이슬, "온실가스감축을 위한 청정개발체제(CDM): 문제점과 개선방안" 경제연구소 22 (22): 279-294, 2015

      5 서경애 ; 김가희 ; 김은석 ; 석희정 ; 신수정 ; 김영란 ; 강필구, "비료제조업의 국내와 EU 최적가용기법 기준서 비교·분석" 한국환경과학회 29 (29): 307-318, 2020

      6 서경애 ; 김은석 ; 김가희 ; 간종범 ; 홍석영 ; 강필구, "골판지원지 제조업 최적가용기법 기준서의 이해와 개선사항" 한국환경과학회 29 (29): 559-573, 2020

      7 Gillenwater M, "What is Additionality? Part 1: A long standing problem. Discussion Paper No. 001, Ver03" GHG management institute

      8 UNFCCC, "What are Market and Non-Market Mechanisms?"

      9 Hayashi D, "Towards a more standardised approach to baselines and additionality under the CDM"

      10 Roudier S, "The role of BAT conclusions and BREFs in the industrial Emission Directive (IED)"

      11 Noh DW, "The latest negotiation trends under UNFCCC and their implications. Trends in Global Environmental Policy. 2020-01"

      12 Kuneman E, "The Korea Emissions Trading electricity market Influence of market structures and market regulation on the carbon market. Case study report" German Environment Agency

      13 MOE, "The 3rd Emission Trading Scheme (2021~2025) of Korea"

      14 UNFCCC [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change], "THE MARRAKESH ACCORDS & THE MARRAKESH DECLARATION"

      15 Kim GH, "Status of the Korean Emission Trading Scheme and Future recommendations" Korea Energy Economics Institute

      16 MOE, "Start of the discussion on the ‘2050 Carbon Neutrality Plan of Korea’ between MOE and Industry"

      17 Schneider L, "Standardized baselines for the CDM – Are we on the right track?"

      18 National Institute of Korean Langauge, "Standard Korean Language Dictionary. Technology & Technique"

      19 Ahonen H, "Safeguarding integrity of market-based cooperation under Article 6 Additionality determination and baseline setting"

      20 UNFCCC, "Rules, modalities and procedures for the mechanism established by Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement"

      21 UNFCCC, "Review of the joint implementation guidelines: Draft conclusions proposed by the Chair, FCCC/SBI/2016/L8"

      22 MAPAMA [Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino], "Resolution of the Designated National Authority approving guidelines that will rule the approval by the Designated National Authority of the voluntary participation of Spain in Joint Implementation projects aimed at reduction of N2O emissions in nitric acid plants in Spain"

      23 Lee YS, "Research on connecting the Integrated Prevention and Pollution Control and Environmental Impact Assessment Systems of Korea" Institute of Environmental Research

      24 EU, "Regulations, Directives and other acts"

      25 OECD, "Recommendation of the Council on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control OECD/LEGAL/0256"

      26 MOE, "Publication of the BAT regerence documents for all industrial areas"

      27 PFA [Act on the integrated control of pollutant-dischargingfacilities of Korea], "Pollutant-discharging facilities act"

      28 PA [Paris Agreement], "Paris Agreement"

      29 BroeckhoffB, "Options and Guidance for the Development of Baselines. Partnership for Market Readiness. Technical Note 5"

      30 GIR [Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center], "Offset Registry System. Project methodology status"

      31 OPG [Administrative Guideline for the assessment and certification of the carbon offset project], "Offset Project Guideline"

      32 MOFA [Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Korea], "Nationally Determined Contribution and Long-term low greenhouse gas Emission Development Strategy(LEDS) of Korea"

      33 MOE, "National allocation plan under the 3rd Emission Trading Scheme (2021~2025) of Korea"

      34 MOE [Ministry of Environment of Korea], "National allocation plan under the 2nd Emission Trading Scheme (2018~2020) of Korea"

      35 UNEP, "Minamata Convention on Mercury: Text and annexes"

      36 UNFCCC, "Mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol"

      37 IEPS [Integrated Environmental Permission System], "Korea BAT Reference Documents"

      38 OPM [Office for Government Policy Coordination of Korea], "Introduction plan for the Act on Allocation and Trading of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances of Korea"

      39 Gong SY, "International comparison of benchmark cases under the emission trading schemes" Korea Environment Institute

      40 UNFCCC, "Information note on proposed draft guidelines for determination of baseline and additionality thresholds for standardized baselines using the performance penetration approach, CDM-MP58-A20"

      41 EU, "Industrial Emissions Directive"

      42 JISC [Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee], "Guidance on criteria for baseline setting and monitoring (Version 03)" Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee

      43 GTMG [Administrative Guideline for the Greenhouse gas Target Management System], "GHG Target Management Guideline"

      44 KRIHS [Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements], "Explanation of human settlement terminology" Best Available Technology

      45 Krause E, "Emission Trading Worldwide. International Carbon Action Partnership"

      46 Emission Trading Act Enforcement Decree [Enforcement Decree Of the Act on Allocation and Trading of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances of Korea], "Emission Trading Act"

      47 OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development], "Emission Baselines: Estimating the Unknown"

      48 OECD, "Effective Carbon Rates 2021"

      49 EU, "EU ETS Handbook"

      50 EU [European Union], "EU Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) Text with EEA relevance"

      51 Lo Re L, "Designing the Article 6.4 mechanism: assessing selected baseline approaches and their implications, Climate Change Expert Group, Paper No. 2019(5)"

      52 OSPAR Convention [Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic], "Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic" OSPAR Commission

      53 KECO [Korea Environment Corporation], "Common Guideline for Carbon Offset Project"

      54 EU, "Commission documents under the IED"

      55 EU, "Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/447 of 12 March 2021. determining revised benchmark values for free allocation of emission allowances for the period from 2021 to 2025 pursuant to Article 10a(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council"

      56 KONETIC [Korean National Environmental Technology Information Center], "Card News. Integrated Prevention and Pollution Control"

      57 BMBF [Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety of Germany], "Carbon markets"

      58 MOE, "Carbon Neutrality Implementation Plan of Ministry of Environment of Korea"

      59 Refinitiv, "Carbon Market Year in Review 2020"

      60 EU, "COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 10 February 2012 laying down rules concerning guidance on the collection of data and on the drawing up of BAT reference documents and on their quality assurance referred to in Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions. 2012/119/EU"

      61 EU, "COMMISSION DECISION of 27 April 2011determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2011/278/EU). Official Journal of the European Union L130 1~45"

      62 UNEP DTU Partnership, "CDM pipeline overview.approaved methods section"

      63 UNFCCC, "CDM Methodology Booket, Twelfth edition"

      64 Michaelowa A, "Best available technology and benchmark baseline setting under the Article 6.4 mechanism. Discussion paper" Perspectives Climate Group

      65 Fuessler J, "Benchmarks to determine baselines for mitigation action under the Article 6.4 mechanism. Discussion Paper" German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the German Environment Agency

      66 Toener A, "Benchmarking in the EU. Lessons from the EU emissions trading system for the global climate change agenda. CEPS Task Force Report"

      67 EU, "BAT reference documents"

      68 UNEP [United Nations Environment Program], "Appendix II: Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants"

      69 Son IS, "Analysis of the main changes under the 4th EU Emission Trading scheme and policy implication for the 3rd Korean emission trading scheme" Korea Energy Economics Institute 2020

      70 EU, "Allocation to industrial installations"

      71 EU, "Adoption of the Regulation determining benchmark values for free allocation for the period 2021~2025"

      72 AG [Allocation Guidance], "Administrative Guideline on Allocation and Cancellation of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances of Korea"

      73 Axel Michaelowa, "Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement" Informa UK Limited 19 (19): 1211-1224, 2019

      74 PMR [Partnership for Market Readiness], "A Guide to Greenhouse Gas Benchmarking for Climate Policy Instruments. Technical Note 7"

      75 Related ministries [Joint publication of the relatedministries of Korea], "2050 Carbon Neutrality Implementation Strategy of Korea"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2014-06-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society of Climate Change Research
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼