주어 인상 구문과 예외적인 격 표시 구문에 대한 벼교언어학적 고찰

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper examines the Subject Raising and Exceptional Case Marking Constructions in English, Turkish and Korean. The Subject Raising in English is possible if the complement clause is non-finite, whereas it is impossible if the complement clause is finite. In Turkish, Dialect A shows the properties similar to those of English. on the other hand, in the case of Dialect B the Subject Raising is possible in both finite and non-finite clauses. When NP (Noun Phrase) is raised or moves, it leaves trace which is called NP-trace. While in the raising in non-finite clause, the trace can be treated as NP-trace normally, in the raising in finite clause, the trace can not be treated as NP- trace because the trace is placed in the position in which the case is licensed. In oder to solve the problem mentioned the above, Moore (1998) adopts the Copy-Raising Analysis under which A-chain can include (silent) pronominal as its tail. Since there is no non-finite clause in the Subject Raising Constructions in Korean, unlike in English and Turkish, it follows that A-Move occurs only in the finite clause. While in the case of the finite clause, most of the native speaker do not allow the Subject Raising, some of the speakers do allow it. The latter case is much the same as the one of Dialect B in Turkish. The fact that the subject is raised or moves in the finite clause means that the case-licensed element is raised or moves. Accordingly the empty category can not be NP-trace in this subject position but be (silent) pronominal as in Turkish. Besides, it is observed that the phenomenon similar to the one in the Raising Construction is discovered in the Exceptional Cases Marking Construction. The difference is that in the former the subject in the complement clause is raised to the subject position in the matrix sentence, whereas in the latter the subject in the complement clause is raised to the object position in matrix sentence. Under such an analysis, Raising or Move violates Chain Condition which requires the tail of A-chain is the single theta-position while the head is the single Case-marked position. In order to overcome this difficulty we adopt Revised Chain Condition which permits the tale of A-chain to have Case and theta-role at the same time. The remaining potential problem is about Resumptive Pronoun Strategy used in A -Move. We demonstrate that the strategy can be and is being used in A-Move cross-linguistically.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김동욱, "한국어 추측표현의 의미차이에 관한 연구 -‘ㄴ 것 같다’, ‘ㄴ 듯 하다’와 ‘ㄴ가 보다’, ‘ㄴ 모양이다’의 의미차이를 중심으로’" 35 : 171-197, 2000

2 서정목, "변형과 제약" 태학사 2000

3 우순조, "내포문과 평가구문" 26 : 59-98, 1995

4 임홍빈, "국어의 통사적인 공범주에 대하여" 21 : 331-384, 1985

5 Chomsky, Noam, "on Transformation in: Essays on Form and Interpretation" American Elsvier 1977

6 Moore, John, "Turkish Copy-raising and A-Chain Locality" 16 : 149-189, 1998

7 Radford, Andrew, "Transformational Syntax" Cambridge University Press 1981

8 Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" MIT Press 1995

9 Tanaka, Hidekazu, "Raising to Object out of CP" 33 : 637-652, 2002

10 Yoon James Hye-Suk, "Raising of Major Arguments in Korean and Japanese" 25 : 615-653, 2007

11 Mulder, Jean, "Raising in Turkish" The Berkeley Linguistic Society, University of California 298-307, 1976

12 Bouchard, Denis, "On the Content of Empty Categories" Foris 1984

13 Postal, Paul, "On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications" MIT Press 1974

14 Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" Foris 1981

15 Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use" Prager 1986

16 Haegeman, Liliane, "Introduction to Government & Binding Theory" Blackwell 1992

17 Brendemoen, Bernt, "Head of S in Turkish: A Comparative Approach to Turkish Syntax" Boğaziçi University Publication 85-100, 1986

18 Yoon, Hang-Jin, "ECM in Korean" 37 : 27-57, 2004

19 Yoon James Hye-Suk, "Ambiguity of Government and the Chain Condition" 14 : 105-162, 1996

20 Deprez, Viviane, "'Raisig Construction in Haitian Creole" 10 : 191-232, 1992

21 Lasnik, Howard, "'On the Subject of Infinitives" Chicago Linguistic Society 324-343, 1991

22 Kim, Dong Suk, "'Korean ECM Constructions and the Theory of Phase" 33 : 47-77, 2003

23 George, Leland M., "'Finiteness and Boundedness in Turkish in: Binding and Filtering" MIT Press 105-127, 1981

24 Lasnik, Howard, "'Case and Expletives Revisited: On Greed and Other human Failings" 26 : 615-633, 1995

25 Chomsky, Noam, "'A minimalist program for linguistic theory in: The view from building 20" MIT Press 1-52, 1993