한국의 장애인자립생활센터 시범사업 평가와 향후 과제

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 2005년에 실시된 장애인 자립생활센터 시범사업의 성과를 점검하고 향후 개선과제를 제시하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 자립생활센터 프로그램의 평가는 결과 중심의 성과평가 방식에 따라 이루어졌으며 성과평가의 한계를 보완하기 위하여 논리모델의 준거틀을 활용하였다. 논리모델의 구성요소에 따라 자원(투입), 활동(과정), 산출, 성과 등 4개 범주로 분석틀을 구성하고, 자립생활센터소장 10명과 센터 이용자 231명을 대상으로 면접 및 전화 인터뷰를 실시하여 자료를 수집하였다.
분석 결과, 68.8%의 이용자가 자립생활센터 서비스를 통해 지식(기술)을 습득하였으며, 87.0%가 삶의 변화를 경험한 것으로 응답하였고, 82.9%가 서비스에 만족하는 것으로 조사되었다. 또한 센터서비스 이용 후 자신감 및 일상생활에서 유의미한 변화가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 고용상태 및 자립생활실천 사례에 있어서도 상당한 성과가 있는 것으로 조사되었다.
이를 바탕으로, 이 연구는 전 장애영역 및 읍·면지역으로 자립생활서비스 확대의 필요성, 자립생활센터의 제도화, 자립생활서비스의 질 향상을 위한 자립생활센터 연합체의 역량강화, 서비스 질을 높이기 위한 핵심서비스의 매뉴얼 개발 등을 제안한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The study aims to evaluate the outcomes of the Centers for Independent Living (CILs) demonstration program and to recommend future directions for CILs in 2006. The framework for the evaluation is a logic model, which facilitates outcome-based performance measurement. The measures associated with the logic model include input, activity, output, and outcomes. The data were collected by interviewing the executive directors of 10 CILs and conducting telephone survey with 231 consumers with disabilities. The study found that 69% consumers acquired new knowledge and skills for independent living. The study also revealed that 87% consumers experienced the positive changes in their lives and 83% consumers were satisfied with the services of the Centers. After using the services, consumers reported significant increases in self-confidence, and in the number and the level of involvement in the activities. In addition, the study found that the employment status of the consumers was improved, and the number of persons who were living in institutions was decreased.
The study supports the advancement of policy to institutionalize Centers for Independent Living, and points to the importance of developing the capacity of the Association of Centers for Independent Living to ensure high quality services. In addition, it is suggested that the development of a manual for these services is necessary, and that services should be provided across disabilities and throughout the country, especially in rural areas.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• [요약]
• 1. 서론
• 2. 성과 평가에 있어서 논리모델
• 3. 미국의 장애인자립생활센터 평가
• 4. 조사 방법
• 5. 조사 결과
• 6. 결론 및 제언
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유동철, "한국 장애운동의 성과와 과제" 한국사회복지정책학회 (21) : 5-32, 2005

2 보건복지부, "중증장애인 자립생활(IL)센터 시범사업 추진계획(안)" 보건복지부 2005

3 김경미, "장애인의 활동보조서비스 이용 이후 삶의 변화에 대한 연구" 57 (57): 253-274, 2005

4 김경혜, "장애인 자립생활센터 운영 기반 조성방안" 서울시정개발연구원 2004

5 이익섭, "장애인 자립생활 시범사업 평가 및 모델 개발 연구" 보건복지부 2006

6 Cole, "Whats New About Independent Living?" 458-462, 1979

7 McLaughlin, J. A, "Using Logic Models" San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons 7-32, 2004

8 Birckmayer, J. D, "Theory-Based Evaluation in Practice: What Do We Learn?" 24 (24): 407-431, 2000

9 Savaya, R, "The Logic Model: A Tool for Incorporating Theory in Development and Evaluation of Program" 29 (29): 85-103, 2005

10 Nosek, "The Evolution of Independent Living Programs" 174-189, 1922

11 Cole, J. A, "Skills Training" NE: iUnivers 187-204, 2001

12 Department of Education, "Report Instrument: Section 704 Annual Performance Report for Center for Independent Living Program" 2006

13 Royse, D, "Program Evaluation: An Introduction (4th ed)" Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole 2006

14 Budde, "Problems and Benefits Associated with Consumer Satisfaction Evaluation at Independent Living Centers Journal of Rehabilitation 55" 62-68, 1989

15 Poister, T. H, "Performance Monitoring" San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons 98-125, 2004

16 Hatry, H. P, "Performance Measurement: Getting Results" Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute Press 1999

17 Office of Management and Budget, "PART 101: Introductory Training" 2006

18 Hatry, H. P, "Other Issues and Trends in Evaluation" San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons 670-684, 2004

19 Martin, L. L, "Measuring the Performance of Human Service Programs" Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1996

20 United Way of America, "Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach" Arlington, VA: United Way of America 1996

21 Schalock, R. L, "Measuring Outcomes and Managing for Result" 26 : 229-235, 2003

22 McLaughlin, J. A, "Logic Models: A Tool for Telling your Programs Performance Story" 22 : 65-72, 1999

23 United Way of America, "Logic Model Handbook" Arlington, VA: United Way of America 2006

24 Nosek, "Level of Compliance with Federal Requirements in Independent Living Centers Journal of Rehabilitation 55" 31-37, 1989

25 Office of Management and Budget, "Independent Living for People with Disabilities" 2003

26 Austin, D. M, "Human Services Management: Organizational Leadership in Social Work Practice" New York: Columbia University Press 2002

27 CESSI, "Evaluation of the Centers for Independent Living Program" 2003

28 Stoddard, S, "Evaluating Program Methods and Results" NE: iUnivers 273-291, 2001

29 Perrin, B, "Effective Use and Misuse of Performance Measurement" 19 (19): 367-379, 1998

30 DeJong, "Directions for Disability Policy and Research" UCIRMichigan State University 1981

31 ODay, B, "Consumer Outcomes of Centers for Independent Living Program" 20 (20): 83-89, 2004

32 Wilson, K. E, "Centers for Independent Living in Support of Transition" 13 (13): 246-252, 1998

33 Lachat, "Center for Resource Management" Inc 1988

34 Usiak, D. J, "Can the 704 Annual Performance Report be used planning? A critical review" 20 : 5-20, 2004

35 변용찬, "2005년도 장애인실태조사" 보건복지부,한국보건사회연구원 2006