RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    동물의 권리문제와 불교의 생명윤리 -개체의 고통이란 기준을 중심으로 = The Problem of Animal Rights and the Position of Buddhist Bioethics -centered on the standard of the pain of individual animals

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102737429

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The moral controversies regarding animal rights, which had begun earnestly to be discussed after the publication of Animal Liberation(1975) by Peter Singer, now seems to be concerned with some concrete practical methodology of animal rights beyond its theoretical differences. My essay firstly examines James Rachels` ``moral individualism`` and Richard D. Ryder``s ``painism``, which both principles has been evaluated to deal with the question from the above viewpoint, and then compares these with the ``discriminative relative equality`` of Theravada tradition and the ``indiscriminative absolute equality`` of Zen Buddhism in the relationships between animal and human beings. It is to look back round reflexively our current ethical stance and attitude towards animal welfare/rights which have been ever uncritically accepted. Here we could conclude that our urgent priority is not to continue debating the pure theoretical arguments over animal rights, but to find out the actual ways being able to improve animal`s tragic conditions, as it is, for example; not to eat meat as possible as; not to wear animal skins; not to enjoy oneself any kind of sports abusing animals and hunting; not to use the shampoo and cosmetics including animal ingredients, and further practice our own such resolutions promptly. For I think that overall pains for animal to experience in this world is literally very serious more than we can usually imagine.
    번역하기

    The moral controversies regarding animal rights, which had begun earnestly to be discussed after the publication of Animal Liberation(1975) by Peter Singer, now seems to be concerned with some concrete practical methodology of animal rights beyond its...

    The moral controversies regarding animal rights, which had begun earnestly to be discussed after the publication of Animal Liberation(1975) by Peter Singer, now seems to be concerned with some concrete practical methodology of animal rights beyond its theoretical differences. My essay firstly examines James Rachels` ``moral individualism`` and Richard D. Ryder``s ``painism``, which both principles has been evaluated to deal with the question from the above viewpoint, and then compares these with the ``discriminative relative equality`` of Theravada tradition and the ``indiscriminative absolute equality`` of Zen Buddhism in the relationships between animal and human beings. It is to look back round reflexively our current ethical stance and attitude towards animal welfare/rights which have been ever uncritically accepted. Here we could conclude that our urgent priority is not to continue debating the pure theoretical arguments over animal rights, but to find out the actual ways being able to improve animal`s tragic conditions, as it is, for example; not to eat meat as possible as; not to wear animal skins; not to enjoy oneself any kind of sports abusing animals and hunting; not to use the shampoo and cosmetics including animal ingredients, and further practice our own such resolutions promptly. For I think that overall pains for animal to experience in this world is literally very serious more than we can usually imagine.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김일방, "피터 싱어의 동물해방론 비판" 대한철학회 84 : 217-240, 2002

    2 김성한, "피터 싱어의 동물해방론" 고려대학교 철학연구소 22 : 1999

    3 안옥선, "인간과 동물간 무경계적 인식과 실천" 범한철학회 (31) : 231-260, 2003

    4 김진석, "인간과 동물-권리와 복지논쟁" 2004

    5 김성한, "응용윤리(윤리학 길잡이 3)" 철학과 현실사 2005

    6 안옥선, "업설에 나타난 불교 생명관의 한 특징:인간과 동물의 평등" 대한철학회 89 : 243-266, 2004

    7 피터싱어, "실천 윤리학" 철학과 현실사 2003

    8 서재영, "선의 생태철학" 동국대학교출판부 2007

    9 서재영, "선사들의 삶을 통해 본 동물의 도덕적 지위" 불교문화연구원 (46) : 215-238, 2005

    10 피터 하비, "불교윤리학입문: 토대, 가치와 쟁점" 씨·아이·알 2010

    1 김일방, "피터 싱어의 동물해방론 비판" 대한철학회 84 : 217-240, 2002

    2 김성한, "피터 싱어의 동물해방론" 고려대학교 철학연구소 22 : 1999

    3 안옥선, "인간과 동물간 무경계적 인식과 실천" 범한철학회 (31) : 231-260, 2003

    4 김진석, "인간과 동물-권리와 복지논쟁" 2004

    5 김성한, "응용윤리(윤리학 길잡이 3)" 철학과 현실사 2005

    6 안옥선, "업설에 나타난 불교 생명관의 한 특징:인간과 동물의 평등" 대한철학회 89 : 243-266, 2004

    7 피터싱어, "실천 윤리학" 철학과 현실사 2003

    8 서재영, "선의 생태철학" 동국대학교출판부 2007

    9 서재영, "선사들의 삶을 통해 본 동물의 도덕적 지위" 불교문화연구원 (46) : 215-238, 2005

    10 피터 하비, "불교윤리학입문: 토대, 가치와 쟁점" 씨·아이·알 2010

    11 데미언 키온, "불교 응용윤리학 입문" 한국불교연구원 2007

    12 피터 싱어, "동물해방" 인간사랑 1999

    13 박정기, "동물의 법적 지위에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 51 (51): 25-53, 2010

    14 김성한, "동물의 도덕적 지위에 대한 진화론의 함의" 대한철학회 98 : 25-48, 2006

    15 제임스 레이첼즈, "동물에서 유래된 인간: 다윈주의의 도덕적 함의" 나남 2007

    16 박이문, "동물권과 동물해방" (가을) : 2000

    17 Frey R. G, "Vivisection, Morals and Medicine: An Exchange, In Bioethics; An Anthology" Blackwell 1999

    18 Pollan, Michael, "The Unnatural Idea of Animal Rights, In Morality in Practice" Wadsworth 2004

    19 Varner, Gary E, "The Prospects for Consensus and Convergence in the Animal Rights Debate, In The Environmental Ethics & Policy Book" Wadsworth 1998

    20 Phelps, Norm, "The Great Compassion-Buddhism & Animal Rights-" Lantern Books 2004

    21 Schmithausen, Lambert, "The Early Buddhist Tradition and Ecological Ethics" 4 : 1997

    22 Regan, Tom, "The Case for Animal Rights" 1999

    23 de Silva, Lily, "The Buddhist Attitude Towards Nature"

    24 Singer, Peter, "Practical Ethics, second ed" Cambridge University 1993

    25 Ryder, Richard D, "Painism: A Modern Morality" Centaur Press, An imprint of Open Gate Press 2001

    26 Cochrane, Alasdair, "Ownership and Justice for Animals" 21 (21):

    27 Frey, R. G, "Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism, In Ethics in Practice; An Anthology" Blackwell 1999

    28 P. Pojman, Louis, "Environmental Ethics; Readings in Theory and Application" Wadsworth 2001

    29 R. Machan, Tibor, "Do Animals Have Rights?, In Appling Ethics; A Text with Readings, 5th ed" Wadsworth 1996

    30 Machan, Tibor R, "Do Animals Have Rights?, In Appling Ethics; A Text with Readings, 5th ed" Wadsworth 1996

    31 Keown, Damien, "Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction" Oxford University Press 2005

    32 Tucker, Mary Evelyn, "Buddhism and Ecology: The Interconnection of Dharma and Deeds" Harvard University Press 1997

    33 Harris, Ian, "Attitudes to Nature, In Buddhism" Continuum 2001

    34 Gruen, Lori, "Animals, In A Companion to Ethics" Blackwell 1993

    35 Pluhar, Evelyn, "Animal Rights, In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol.1" Academic Press 1998

    36 Callicott, J. Baird, "Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair" 2001

    37 Singer, Peter, "Animal Liberation, 2nd ed" Pimlico 1995

    38 Sagoff, Mark, "Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce, In Environmental Ethics; What Really Matters, What Really Works?" Oxford University Press 2002

    39 Bentham, Jeremy, "An Introduction to the Principle of Morals and Legislation, chapter 17"

    40 Harvey, Peter, "An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics -Foundations, Values and Issues-" Cambridge University Press 2000

    41 Anne Warren, Marry, "A Critique of Regan’s Animal Rights Theory" 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-02-24 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Ethics Studies Association -> The Korean Association of Ethics KCI등재
    2014-02-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Ethics Studies -> Journal of Ethics KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-12-20 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국국민윤리학회 -> 한국윤리학회 KCI등재
    2006-12-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 국민윤리연구 -> 윤리연구
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Ethics Studies
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.43 0.43 0.42
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.4 0.578 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼