遼東地域 支石墓의 硏究成果 檢討

국문 초록 (Abstract)

遼東地域의 支石墓는 현재까지 600여 基가 보고되었다. 주로 太子河 流域을 경계로 남부와 북부지역이 密集圈을 이루고 있다. 遼東 南部圈은 대부분 卓子式이고 개석식은 소수이다. 지석묘의 기원과 상한 연대에 대해서는 여러 의견이 존재하지만, 紀元前 10世紀 전후부터 築造되었다는 견해에 대부분 동의 하고 있다. 그러나 普蘭店 王屯遺蹟에서 雙砣子2期文化인 紀元前 16世紀의 유물이 출토된 바 있으며, 또 최근 일부 탁자식 지석묘의 구조 및 축조방법 등이 雙砣子3期文化의 積石墓와 매우 유사한 것으로 밝혀져 주목된다. 蓋石式 支石墓는 紀元前 12~11世紀 전후 太子河流域의 馬城子文化(洞窟墓)가 주변 지역으로 擴散되는 과정 중 遼東 南部의 支石墓 文化와 接觸하여 出現한 것으로 이해하고 있다. 鳳城 東山遺蹟의 경우 紀元前 12~11世紀로 편년되는데, 지석묘의 덮개돌〔蓋石〕이 殘存하며 墓室 構造와 出土遺物은 洞窟墓의 傳統을 維持하는 특징을 보인다. 遼東 北部圈은 분포 지역과 조성 연대에 따라 지역별 형식이 다르게 나타난다. 卓子式은 輝發河 流域 을 중심으로 遼北 각지에 분포하지만, 太子河 流域은 除外되는 양상이다. 墓室 밖으로 다량의 積石施 設이 특징적이다. 이와 달리 蓋石式은 太子河 流域에 분포하고 편년이 늦을수록 墓室 周邊에 積石施設 이 附加된 경우가 많다. 이들 지석묘는 덮개돌의 규모가 縮小되는 傾向性을 보여주며, 주변에 高句麗 初期 段階의 積石墓 遺蹟들이 共存한다는 점 역시 그 시사하는 바가 크다고 하겠다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

About 600 dolmens have been found in Liaodong area so far. Seeing the distribution pattern of the dolmens, they are mainly clustered in the southern and northern areas of Taizi River. The types of dolmens in these areas can be classified into table-type and no-leg type dolmen. The structural characteristics of the two types are similar to each other in general, but their distinctions were also identified through the relics found. That is, they are similar in terms of types and basic structure, but have clear differences in terms of the year that they were built and cultural patterns of archeology. Table-type dolmens were mostly found in the southern cluster zone of Liaodong area with a few no-leg type dolmens. Regarding the origin and the upper limit of the suspected era, there are diverse opinions. Nonetheless, it is generally understood that dolmens were built commonly in the Liaodong area-wide around the 10th century B.C. On the other hand, current research reported that some relics in the Wangtun Tomb, Purantien and they can be suspected as the 2nd period of Shuangtuozi culture, which is regarded as a relatively earlier period. Furthermore, parts of table-type dolmens were very similar to stone-pile tombs of the 3rd period of Shuangtuozi culture in terms of the structure and construction method. That is, the table-type dolmens in Liaodong area were created and developed in the close connection with the Shuangtuozi culture. It is understood that the no-leg type dolmens were built by contacting dolmen culture of the southern part of Liaodong area in the process that Machengzi Culture in the basin of Taizi River was expanding to neighboring regions in the 12th ~11th century B.C. The oldest one was found in the Tungshan relics in Fengcheng City. They had a lid stone, which is the major characteristic of dolmen. The structure of tomb chambers and the relics excavated showed the tradition of cave tombs. The dolmens in the northern cluster zone of Liaodong area vary in terms of major distribution regions and times of popularity. Table-type dolmens were distributed every part of Liaobei area but they were mainly clustered centering on Shuiren. In the basin of Hunhe River, stone-piling facilities were found in quantity at the outside of the tomb chambers. No-leg type dolmens were classified into three types according to the construction method and materials used for the chambers. No-leg type I (pit-type) dolmens are mainly distributed in the upper area of Taizi River and Shuiren River. No-leg type II (block stone-type) dolmens are distributed in the upper area of Taizi River. No-leg type Ⅲ (combination-type) dolmens are mainly distributed in the upper area of Taizi River and East Riao River. That is, the no-leg type dolmens in this region are clustered centering on Taizi River, which has difference in distribution pattern from table-type dolmens. They demonstrate local distinctions. As for the dolmens in Northern cluster zone, more accumulated stone facilities were added a lot around the tomb chambers as the era passed by. For those dolmens, the size of lid stone became smaller, regardless of the type of dolmens. There also coexisted the relics of stone-pile tombs of the early Goguryeo Kingdom in or around the same tombs, which suggested a lot of significance.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문초록
• Ⅰ.머리말
• Ⅱ.現況
• Ⅲ.檢討
• Ⅳ.맺는말
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 許明綱, "遼寧新金雙房石蓋石棺墓" 293-295, 1983

2 朱永剛, "遼東地區雙房式陶壺硏究" 89-97, 2008

3 李新全, "遼東地區積石墓的演變" 3-11, 2009

4 許玉林, "遼東半島石棚綜述" 181-, 1981

5 武家昌, "遼東半島石棚初探" 13-17, 1994

6 許玉林, "遼東半島石棚之硏究" 16-21, 1985

7 遼寧省文物考古硏究所, "遼東半島石棚" 遼寧科學技術出版社 1-236, 1994

8 許志國, "遼寧開原建材村石棺墓群" 64-70, 2000

9 旅順博物館, "遼寧長海縣上馬石靑銅時代墓葬" 591-596, 1982

10 許玉林, "遼寧蓋縣伙家窩堡石棚發掘簡報" 800-804, 1993

11 符松子, "遼寧省新發見兩座石棚" 30-32, 1956

12 遼寧省考古文物硏究所, "遼寧本溪縣新城子靑銅時代墓地" 771-784, 2010

13 劉俊勇, "遼寧新金縣王屯石棺墓" 10-11, 1988

14 백종오, "遼南地域 靑銅器時代遺蹟의 發掘現況과 硏究成果" 고조선단군학회 29 (29): 181-230, 2013

15 山本正, "歷ど地理" 1931

16 국립나주문화재연구소, "동북아시아지석묘(5)" 1-326, 2011

17 하문식, "고조선지역의 고인돌 연구" 백산자료원 1999

18 許玉林, "風城縣大石蓋墓發掘簡報" 1-8, 1990

19 許玉寬, "風城縣南山斗古墓調査" 26-29, 1987

20 崔玉寬, "風城東山,西山大石蓋1992年墓發掘簡報" 30-35, 1997

21 中國社會科學院考古學硏究所, "雙砣子與崗上--遼東史前文化的發掘和硏究" 科學出版社 1-164, 1996

22 旅順博物館, "遼寧大連新金縣碧流河大石蓋墓" 709-711, 1984

23 遼寧省文物考古硏究所, "趙家墳石棚發掘刊報" 20-22, 2007

24 東亞考古學會, "貔子窩" 1929

25 王嗣州, "論中國東北地域大石蓋墓" 53-63, 1998

26 陳大爲, "試論遼寧“石棚”的性質及其變化" 82-84, 1991

27 劉瑛, "試論遼東半島石棚遺存" 中央民族大學 2007

28 王嗣洲, "試論遼東半島石棚與大石蓋墓的關係" 73-77, 1996

29 王洪峰, "石棚墓葬硏究" 知識出版社 (1) : 245-255, 1993

30 三上次男, "滿鮮原始墳墓の硏究" 吉川弘文館 1961

31 八木裝三郞, "滿洲舊蹟志 上卷" 1924

32 三宅俊成, "滿洲考古學槪說"

33 陳明達, "海城縣的巨石建築" (10) : 72-77, 1953

34 中日考古合作硏究測量組, "東北亞考古學硏究-中日合作硏究報告書" 文物出版社 84-100, 1997

35 吳大洋, "朝鮮半島北部地區靑銅器時代石構墓葬硏究-兼論中國東北地區之比較" 吉林大 2013

36 付文才, "普蘭店市核桃溝石蓋石棺墓整理簡報" 48-, 2000

37 許玉林, "新金雙房石棚和石蓋石棺墓" 92-97, 1983

38 肖景全, "新賓旺淸門鎭龍頭山大石蓋墓" 1-25, 2005

39 遼寧省文物考古硏究所, "撫順河夾心墓地發掘簡報" 遼海出版社 (3) : 334-341, 2008

40 武家昌, "撫順山龍石棚與積石墓" 13-18, 1997

41 遼寧省考古硏究所, "大連庄河平頂山靑銅時代遺址發掘簡報" 3-8, 2011

42 許明綱, "大連古代石築墓葬硏究" 62-73, 1990

43 旅順博物館, "大連于家村砣頭積石墓址" 39-50, 1983

44 王洪峰, "吉林南部石棚及相關問題" 1-8, 1993

45 鳥居龍藏, "南滿洲調査報告" 1910

46 鳥居龍藏, "中國石棚之硏究" (31) : 1946

47 徐知良, "中國的巨石文化與石棺墓介紹" 55-70, 1958

48 華玉冰, "中國東北地區石棚硏究" 科學出版社 1-253, 2011