RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    양차대전 사이의 영국 경제와 제국 = British Economy and Empire during the Inter-War Years

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Britain experienced a long slump during the inter-war years. The depression raised the rate of unemployment and made the staple industries increasingly worse. At that time the British government enforced some economic policies such as the return of the gold standard system, its abolition, and the strengthening of the sterling bloc based upon the networks of the empire. The situation of the British economy in the mid-1930s became better in comparison with that in the 1920s. P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins point out that most economic policies of the British government represented some interests of gentlemanly capitalists, expecially of financial capitalists in the City during the inter-war years. According to their explanation, the attitudes of the British government towards the gold standard or Ottawa Imperial Conference were deeply related to the intention of pound sterling`s protection, which was the embodiment of gentlemanly capitalism. But the hot debates around the gold standard in the 1920s show that staffs of the Bank of England and governmental officers (expecially Treasury officers) recommended the British government to join the American gold coins standard. Winston Churchill, the Exchequer at that time criticised their views, and decided to return the gold standard for the future prosperity of the empire and the strengthening of the empire networks. And the formation of the sterling bloc was also a result of rational selections of the government for escaping from the long slump. These selections were not influenced directly from the gentlemanly capitalists. In history, ``intention`` must be discussed separately from ``result.`` It seems to me that there are some exaggerations in Cain and Hopkins` interpretation that most financial policies represented gentlemanly capitalists` desires and intentions during the inter-war years But it is also true that those policies could be helpful for their capital-accumulation.
    번역하기

    Britain experienced a long slump during the inter-war years. The depression raised the rate of unemployment and made the staple industries increasingly worse. At that time the British government enforced some economic policies such as the return of th...

    Britain experienced a long slump during the inter-war years. The depression raised the rate of unemployment and made the staple industries increasingly worse. At that time the British government enforced some economic policies such as the return of the gold standard system, its abolition, and the strengthening of the sterling bloc based upon the networks of the empire. The situation of the British economy in the mid-1930s became better in comparison with that in the 1920s. P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins point out that most economic policies of the British government represented some interests of gentlemanly capitalists, expecially of financial capitalists in the City during the inter-war years. According to their explanation, the attitudes of the British government towards the gold standard or Ottawa Imperial Conference were deeply related to the intention of pound sterling`s protection, which was the embodiment of gentlemanly capitalism. But the hot debates around the gold standard in the 1920s show that staffs of the Bank of England and governmental officers (expecially Treasury officers) recommended the British government to join the American gold coins standard. Winston Churchill, the Exchequer at that time criticised their views, and decided to return the gold standard for the future prosperity of the empire and the strengthening of the empire networks. And the formation of the sterling bloc was also a result of rational selections of the government for escaping from the long slump. These selections were not influenced directly from the gentlemanly capitalists. In history, ``intention`` must be discussed separately from ``result.`` It seems to me that there are some exaggerations in Cain and Hopkins` interpretation that most financial policies represented gentlemanly capitalists` desires and intentions during the inter-war years But it is also true that those policies could be helpful for their capital-accumulation.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼