RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Comparison of Efficacy Between Full-dose GEM CCRT and 5FU CCRT in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer = Comparison of Efficacy Between Full-dose GEM CCRT and 5FU CCRT in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99807812

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard therapeutic option for managing locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine are recommended as the reference chemotherapeutic agent for CCRT, the optimal dosage for CCRT is still controversial. Aim: To compare the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of full-dose gemcitabine based CCRT (FG-CCRT) and low dose 5-FU based CCRT (5FU-CCRT) for LAPC. Methods & Materials: From January 2006 to March 2013, 110 patients with LAPC who received FG-CCRT (n=90) or 5FU-CCRT (n=20) were included for retrospective analysis. FG-CCRT included full-dose weekly gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg/m2) or combination therapy with cisplatin (70 mg/m2). 5FU-CCRT treated with radiosensitizing low dose of bolus 5-FU (500mg/m2, weekly) plus leucovorin (20mg/m2). Concurrent radiotherapy targeted the primary tumor with 5 to 10 mm margin without regional lymph node irradiation. One month after completion of CCRT, response evaluation was conducted by computed tomography scan. Results: FG-CCRT had more advanced T-stage at the time of diagnosis (T4-86.7% versus 60.0%; p=0.005). Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher for FG-CCRT than 5FU-CCRT (ORR-32.6% versus 5%; p=0.013; DCR-79.8% versus 50.0%; p=0.006). Both groups showed similar loco-regional control rate (92.2% versus 85.0%; p=0.362) but distant metastasis rate was higher in 5FU-CCRT (17.8% versus 45.0%; p=0.017). Grade 3 or higher neutropenia (34.4% versus 10%; p=0.031) and thrombocytopenia (21.1% versus 0%; p=0.021) was more frequent in FG-CCRT. The subgroup of FG-CCRT patients who received gemcitabine monotherapy showed no significant differences in toxicity rate compared with 5FU-CCRT (all p>0.05). Conclusion: Full-dose gemcitabine based CCRT seems more effective on initial local and distant control of LAPC than bolus 5-FU based CCRT. With cautious monitoring on hematologic toxicities, FG-CCRT can be tolerably conducted. Considering that distant metastasis is one of treatment failure pattern in CCRT of LAPC, full-dose gemcitabine CCRT should be considered as the first line treatment.
      번역하기

      Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard therapeutic option for managing locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine are recommended as the reference chemotherapeutic agent for CCRT, th...

      Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard therapeutic option for managing locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine are recommended as the reference chemotherapeutic agent for CCRT, the optimal dosage for CCRT is still controversial. Aim: To compare the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of full-dose gemcitabine based CCRT (FG-CCRT) and low dose 5-FU based CCRT (5FU-CCRT) for LAPC. Methods & Materials: From January 2006 to March 2013, 110 patients with LAPC who received FG-CCRT (n=90) or 5FU-CCRT (n=20) were included for retrospective analysis. FG-CCRT included full-dose weekly gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg/m2) or combination therapy with cisplatin (70 mg/m2). 5FU-CCRT treated with radiosensitizing low dose of bolus 5-FU (500mg/m2, weekly) plus leucovorin (20mg/m2). Concurrent radiotherapy targeted the primary tumor with 5 to 10 mm margin without regional lymph node irradiation. One month after completion of CCRT, response evaluation was conducted by computed tomography scan. Results: FG-CCRT had more advanced T-stage at the time of diagnosis (T4-86.7% versus 60.0%; p=0.005). Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher for FG-CCRT than 5FU-CCRT (ORR-32.6% versus 5%; p=0.013; DCR-79.8% versus 50.0%; p=0.006). Both groups showed similar loco-regional control rate (92.2% versus 85.0%; p=0.362) but distant metastasis rate was higher in 5FU-CCRT (17.8% versus 45.0%; p=0.017). Grade 3 or higher neutropenia (34.4% versus 10%; p=0.031) and thrombocytopenia (21.1% versus 0%; p=0.021) was more frequent in FG-CCRT. The subgroup of FG-CCRT patients who received gemcitabine monotherapy showed no significant differences in toxicity rate compared with 5FU-CCRT (all p>0.05). Conclusion: Full-dose gemcitabine based CCRT seems more effective on initial local and distant control of LAPC than bolus 5-FU based CCRT. With cautious monitoring on hematologic toxicities, FG-CCRT can be tolerably conducted. Considering that distant metastasis is one of treatment failure pattern in CCRT of LAPC, full-dose gemcitabine CCRT should be considered as the first line treatment.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼