RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      2015 개정 교육과정과 문학 교과서의 도전 = 2015 Curriculum Revision and Challenge of Literary Textbooks

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of this study is focused to seek the possible solutions that can get rid of the problems which had been already internalized in the literary textbook of the previous curriculum and would come out in the textbook development process of the next curriculum. For this purpose I first analyzed the coexistent relation between the multicultural perspective which was included in the 2009 revised curriculum(called ``2011 revision period``)as an achievement standard by the government education policy, and the ethnocentrism as the internal perspective which logically conflicted with the multiculturalism. Also I identified that the ethnocentrism which had become the implicit organizing principle of the literature textbooks had to be evaluated critically, preceding the political-societal demands intruded at the stage of developing textbooks. From this argument I was able to expect three major conclusions as follows;1) integration and elimination of the achievement standards of curriculum caused by workload reductions policy makes more difficult to bring out and concrete the content elements for textbook development, 2) over-sophisticating fixation of the learning process in the textbook structure and formation would cause the standardization of teaching approach, and 3) canonism prioritizing the de-contextural and implicit reading attention in selection and arrangement of the literary works would be likely to remain as it was predicted large power outages. These aspects in the government authorized textbooks system were assessed as not having a positive effect or giving a good contribution to exalt the fundamental values like the diversity of literary education. So I proposed in this study an alternative solution that includes overall rearranging achievement standards between the ``Korean language arts`` and ``Literature`` subjects, providing reinforced authorization criteria for textbook diversification, and registering and applying recommended literary works into the curriculum.
      번역하기

      The aim of this study is focused to seek the possible solutions that can get rid of the problems which had been already internalized in the literary textbook of the previous curriculum and would come out in the textbook development process of the next...

      The aim of this study is focused to seek the possible solutions that can get rid of the problems which had been already internalized in the literary textbook of the previous curriculum and would come out in the textbook development process of the next curriculum. For this purpose I first analyzed the coexistent relation between the multicultural perspective which was included in the 2009 revised curriculum(called ``2011 revision period``)as an achievement standard by the government education policy, and the ethnocentrism as the internal perspective which logically conflicted with the multiculturalism. Also I identified that the ethnocentrism which had become the implicit organizing principle of the literature textbooks had to be evaluated critically, preceding the political-societal demands intruded at the stage of developing textbooks. From this argument I was able to expect three major conclusions as follows;1) integration and elimination of the achievement standards of curriculum caused by workload reductions policy makes more difficult to bring out and concrete the content elements for textbook development, 2) over-sophisticating fixation of the learning process in the textbook structure and formation would cause the standardization of teaching approach, and 3) canonism prioritizing the de-contextural and implicit reading attention in selection and arrangement of the literary works would be likely to remain as it was predicted large power outages. These aspects in the government authorized textbooks system were assessed as not having a positive effect or giving a good contribution to exalt the fundamental values like the diversity of literary education. So I proposed in this study an alternative solution that includes overall rearranging achievement standards between the ``Korean language arts`` and ``Literature`` subjects, providing reinforced authorization criteria for textbook diversification, and registering and applying recommended literary works into the curriculum.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼