리스크 거버넌스 프레임워크(RGF)에 기반한 홍수대비 토지이용규제 합리화 방안 = A Study on Rationalization of Land Use Regulation for Flood Risk Reduction based on Risk Governance Framework

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study examines the case of Shiga Prefecture in Japan, which successfully adopted related systematic ordinances to review rational measures of the land use regulation for flood risk reduction. To this end, this study proposed a framework which complemented the IRGC’s governance framework. The framework analyzed the measures about flooding risk according to the factors of 4 stages(pre-assessment, risk appraisal, scoping, risk management). Independent pilot tests and listening surveys were conducted in the Pre-assessment stage.  Sharing issues between administrative and residential sectors and the process of creating the regional safety map were analyzed in the Risk Appraisal stage. In regard to the Scoping stage, it is the process of sharing and figuring out internal capacity and the solution of Committee for Shiga Prefecture Flood Management of administrative and residential sectors. Finally,  it analyzed the process of adopting the ordinance of integrated flood risk management in the Risk Management stage. It is found that the policies for flood risk reduction of Shiga Prefecture were reasonably derived for the land use regulation through these organized steps.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 홍수대비를 위한 토지이용규제의 합리적인 방안을 살펴보기 위해 관련조례를 체계적으로 제정한 일본의 시가현 사례를 검토한다. 이를 위해 IRGC의 리스크 거버넌스 프레임워크를 보완한 프레임워크를 제시하고 단계별 요소에 따라 시가현의 대책을 분석하였다. 첫 단계인 사전조사에서는 시가현의 독자적인 사전조사 및 청취조사가, 리스크 사정단계에서는 행정과 주민간의 현안공유와 지역 안전도맵을 구축하는 과정으로 분석하였다. 스코핑은 행정과 주민부문의 유역치수검토위원회가 시가현의 내적역량과 해결책을 파악하고 공유해나가는 과정이며 마지막 단계인 리스크 관리는 유역치수조례가 제정되고 실시되는 과정으로 분석하였다. 이러한 유기적 단계를 거쳐 진행된 시가현의 홍수대비 정책은 토지이용규제를 위한 의사결정 과정이 합리적으로 도출되었음을 알 수 있었다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 嘉田由紀子, "生活環境主義を基調とした治水政策論─環境社会学の政策的境位─" 16 : 33-47, 2010

2 滋賀県流域治水検討委員会, "滋賀県流域治水検討委員会（学識者部会）：水害に強い地域づくりのための流域治水の重点施策の推進方策について（提言)" 2010

3 美濃部博, "滋賀県流域治水条例について" 2016

4 滋賀県, "滋賀県流域治水基本方針"

5 滋賀県, "滋賀県流域治水の推進に関する条例（滋賀県条例第55号)"

6 林倫子, "滋賀県水害履歴調査の取り組み; 伝統的な防災・減災の知恵を活かしたまちづくﾚﾉに向けて" 25 : 43-47, 2018

7 大原美保, "滋賀県における宅地建物取引時の水 害リスク情報提供の努力義務に関する実態調査" 32 : 1-9, 2018

8 馬場美智子, "日仏の水害対策のための土地利用・建築規制　ー滋賀県の流域治水条例とフランスのPPRNを事例としてー" 52 (52): 610-616, 2017

9 国土交通省, "大規模氾濫に対する減災のための治水対策検討小委員会：大規模氾濫に対する減災のための治水対策の在り方についての答申 ~社会意識の変革による「水防災意識社会」の再構築~" 2015

10 IRGC, "White paper on risk governance: Toward an Integrative Approach" The International Risk Governance Council 2005

11 Okada, N., "The Yonmenkaigi System Method: An Implementation Oriented Group Decision Support Approach" 22 (22): 53-67, 2013

12 Renn, O., "Risk governance.: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World" Earthscan 2008

13 Choong-Ik Choi, "Distribution and Application of Community-based Disaster Risk Information : Lessons from Shiga Prefecture in Japan" 한국유통과학회 16 (16): 15-23, 2018

14 Choong-Ik Choi, "Development and Distribution of Risk Governance Framework in Terms of Socially Viable Solutions" 한국유통과학회 5 (5): 185-193, 2018

15 Choong-Ik Choi, "Development and Application of a Sensemaking Approach to Community-based Disaster Risk Governance" 한국유통과학회 6 (6): 289-301, 2019

16 Tatano, H., "Challenges for Human Security Engineering: Environmental Science and Engineering" Springer 111-142, 2014