RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    구매 인센티브 유형과 기업 인지도가 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향 = 따뜻함-유능함 지각을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100089938

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    판매촉진의 수단으로 자선적 인센티브가 각광 받고 있으나, 전통적인 금전적 인센티브와 자선적 인센티브의 효과를 비교하는 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 구매 인센티브 유형이 소비자의 반응에 미치는 효과가 기업의 인지도에 따라 어떻게 달라지는지 알아보고자 하였다. 특히, 소비자의 반응에 미치는 영향의 기제를 밝히기 위하여, 소비자의 반응을 인지적, 감정적, 행동적 반응으로 나누고, 인지적 반응으로 기업에 대한 소비자의 따뜻함-유능함 지각의 차원을 사용하였다. 기업이 사용하는 인센티브 유형 및 기업 인지도에 따라 기업에 대한 소비자의 따뜻함-유능함 지각이 어떻게 달라지며, 따뜻함-유능함 지각이 소비자의 감정적 반응(기업에 대한 태도)과 행동적 반응(구매의도)에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구결과, 인센티브 유형과 기업 인지도는 각각 기업에 대한 따뜻함과 유능함 지각에 영향을 줄 뿐 아니라, 인센티브 유형은 유능함 지각에 대한 기업 인지도의 영향을 조절함을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한, 기업에 대한 따뜻함-유능함 지각은 기업에 대한 태도에 긍정적 영향을 미치는데, 지각된 따뜻함보다는 지각된 유능함의 영향력이 크게 나타났다. 아울러 기업에 대한 태도 및 유능함 지각은 해당 기업 제품의 구매의도를 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문은 따뜻함-유능함 차원을 중심으로, 인센티브 유형과 기업 인지도에 따른 소비자의 인지적, 감정적, 행동적 반응을 검증함으로써, 구매 인센티브 및 기업 인지도에 대한 연구를 풍부하게 하였다는 점에서 이론적 의의가 있다. 또한, 기업의 실무자들에게 기업 인지도와 마케팅 목표에 따라 적합한 구매 인센티브에 대한 실무적 시사점을 제공한다.
    번역하기

    판매촉진의 수단으로 자선적 인센티브가 각광 받고 있으나, 전통적인 금전적 인센티브와 자선적 인센티브의 효과를 비교하는 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 구매 인센티브 유형...

    판매촉진의 수단으로 자선적 인센티브가 각광 받고 있으나, 전통적인 금전적 인센티브와 자선적 인센티브의 효과를 비교하는 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 구매 인센티브 유형이 소비자의 반응에 미치는 효과가 기업의 인지도에 따라 어떻게 달라지는지 알아보고자 하였다. 특히, 소비자의 반응에 미치는 영향의 기제를 밝히기 위하여, 소비자의 반응을 인지적, 감정적, 행동적 반응으로 나누고, 인지적 반응으로 기업에 대한 소비자의 따뜻함-유능함 지각의 차원을 사용하였다. 기업이 사용하는 인센티브 유형 및 기업 인지도에 따라 기업에 대한 소비자의 따뜻함-유능함 지각이 어떻게 달라지며, 따뜻함-유능함 지각이 소비자의 감정적 반응(기업에 대한 태도)과 행동적 반응(구매의도)에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구결과, 인센티브 유형과 기업 인지도는 각각 기업에 대한 따뜻함과 유능함 지각에 영향을 줄 뿐 아니라, 인센티브 유형은 유능함 지각에 대한 기업 인지도의 영향을 조절함을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한, 기업에 대한 따뜻함-유능함 지각은 기업에 대한 태도에 긍정적 영향을 미치는데, 지각된 따뜻함보다는 지각된 유능함의 영향력이 크게 나타났다. 아울러 기업에 대한 태도 및 유능함 지각은 해당 기업 제품의 구매의도를 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문은 따뜻함-유능함 차원을 중심으로, 인센티브 유형과 기업 인지도에 따른 소비자의 인지적, 감정적, 행동적 반응을 검증함으로써, 구매 인센티브 및 기업 인지도에 대한 연구를 풍부하게 하였다는 점에서 이론적 의의가 있다. 또한, 기업의 실무자들에게 기업 인지도와 마케팅 목표에 따라 적합한 구매 인센티브에 대한 실무적 시사점을 제공한다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As consumers` social consciousness levels are enhanced, the demand for companies`s social responsibility increase and existing traditional monetary incentive reaches its limit. Accordingly, charity incentive has come into the sposlight as a firm`s purchase incentive. However, there is lack of research comparing the effects of monetary incentive and charity incentive. The purpose of this research is to understand the influence of purchase incentive and the company awareness on consumer`s cognitive reaction (i.e.,warmth-competence perception of the company), and the influence of cognitive reaction on emotional response (ilelk attitude toward the company) and behavioral response (i.e., purchase intention of the company`s product). One hundred and thirty-one undergraduate students were randomly assigned to the conditions of a 2(purchase incentive type: monetary, charity) × 2(company awareness: low, high)between-subjects design. One of the most critical differences between charity incentive and monetary incentive is that the former is other-oriented because the primary beneficiaries are consumers. Monetary incentive focuses on facilitating consumer purchase by offering economic utility, so it has no effect on the warmth perception of company. On the other hand, charity incentive gives consumers a warm glow inside and moral satisfaction by giving donations through their purchases. These positive feelings are transferred to the company through charity incentive. Consequently, consumers perceive the company as warm. The results in this study showed that participants perceived the warmth of the company offering charity incentive to be higher than that of the company offering monetary incentive. High awareness and good reputation implies that the company is worth investing in, is an excellent workplace, and provides high-quality products and services. Thus, consumers perceive the competence of companies with high awareness to be higher than those with low awareness. However, purchase incentive type moderates the relationship between the company awareness and competence perception. Monetary incentive has a more negative influence on companies with low awareness compared with companies with high awareness. Consumers strongly believe that in the latter, the price disocunt would not lower the quality of the product, whereas they doubt that the former would bring price-quality heuristic. Charity incentive does not bring about price-quality heuristic regardless of the company awareness level, so there is no difference in competence perception between companies with high and low awareness. Such warmth-competence perception of a company, which is the consumer`s cognitive reaction affects attitude toward the company and buying intention, which are the consumer`s emotional and behavioral responses, respectively. When a firm is said to be warm, it means it has other-oriented motivation, and intends to provide the best for consumers, and builds and maintains good relationship with them. Consequently, positive responses toward the company are induced. However, because warmth is not directly connected to high quality, only warmth cannot facilitate consumer`s purchase intention and buying behavior. The results of this research showed that the warmth perception of a company has a positive influence on attitude toward the company, but no direct influence on buying intention. When a firm is said to be competent, it means it is competitive, provides outstanding products and services, and has efficient capability. Thus, perceiving a high level of competence gives the consumers expectation that the company offers high-quality products. Therefore, buying intention for the company`s products increases. Our results showed that when participants perceived the competence of a company to be higher, a positive effect on both attitude toward the company and buying intention was generated. Good attitude toward the company also positively affected buying intention. F
    번역하기

    As consumers` social consciousness levels are enhanced, the demand for companies`s social responsibility increase and existing traditional monetary incentive reaches its limit. Accordingly, charity incentive has come into the sposlight as a firm`s pur...

    As consumers` social consciousness levels are enhanced, the demand for companies`s social responsibility increase and existing traditional monetary incentive reaches its limit. Accordingly, charity incentive has come into the sposlight as a firm`s purchase incentive. However, there is lack of research comparing the effects of monetary incentive and charity incentive. The purpose of this research is to understand the influence of purchase incentive and the company awareness on consumer`s cognitive reaction (i.e.,warmth-competence perception of the company), and the influence of cognitive reaction on emotional response (ilelk attitude toward the company) and behavioral response (i.e., purchase intention of the company`s product). One hundred and thirty-one undergraduate students were randomly assigned to the conditions of a 2(purchase incentive type: monetary, charity) × 2(company awareness: low, high)between-subjects design. One of the most critical differences between charity incentive and monetary incentive is that the former is other-oriented because the primary beneficiaries are consumers. Monetary incentive focuses on facilitating consumer purchase by offering economic utility, so it has no effect on the warmth perception of company. On the other hand, charity incentive gives consumers a warm glow inside and moral satisfaction by giving donations through their purchases. These positive feelings are transferred to the company through charity incentive. Consequently, consumers perceive the company as warm. The results in this study showed that participants perceived the warmth of the company offering charity incentive to be higher than that of the company offering monetary incentive. High awareness and good reputation implies that the company is worth investing in, is an excellent workplace, and provides high-quality products and services. Thus, consumers perceive the competence of companies with high awareness to be higher than those with low awareness. However, purchase incentive type moderates the relationship between the company awareness and competence perception. Monetary incentive has a more negative influence on companies with low awareness compared with companies with high awareness. Consumers strongly believe that in the latter, the price disocunt would not lower the quality of the product, whereas they doubt that the former would bring price-quality heuristic. Charity incentive does not bring about price-quality heuristic regardless of the company awareness level, so there is no difference in competence perception between companies with high and low awareness. Such warmth-competence perception of a company, which is the consumer`s cognitive reaction affects attitude toward the company and buying intention, which are the consumer`s emotional and behavioral responses, respectively. When a firm is said to be warm, it means it has other-oriented motivation, and intends to provide the best for consumers, and builds and maintains good relationship with them. Consequently, positive responses toward the company are induced. However, because warmth is not directly connected to high quality, only warmth cannot facilitate consumer`s purchase intention and buying behavior. The results of this research showed that the warmth perception of a company has a positive influence on attitude toward the company, but no direct influence on buying intention. When a firm is said to be competent, it means it is competitive, provides outstanding products and services, and has efficient capability. Thus, perceiving a high level of competence gives the consumers expectation that the company offers high-quality products. Therefore, buying intention for the company`s products increases. Our results showed that when participants perceived the competence of a company to be higher, a positive effect on both attitude toward the company and buying intention was generated. Good attitude toward the company also positively affected buying intention. F

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "팸퍼스"

    2 박소진, "번들가격할인 프레이밍과 메시지 프레이밍이 소비자의 번들구성제품에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향" 한국마케팅학회 13 (13): 55-77, 2011

    3 김동태, "기업연상과 브랜드 애호도간 이중 경로관계 모형" 한국마케팅학회 23 (23): 141-162, 2008

    4 김동태, "가격할인에 대한 지각된 공정성과 재 구매의도에 관한 연구 - 기존 구매자의 인지적, 감정적 반응을 중심으로 -" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 1-27, 2010

    5 Aaker, Jennifer L., "When Good Brands Do Bad" 31 (31): 1-18, 2004

    6 Raghubir, Priya, "When Do Price Promotions Affect Brand Evaluation?" 36 (36): 211-222, 1999

    7 Cuddy, Amy J. C., "Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map" 40 : 61-149, 2008

    8 Winterich, Karen Page, "Warm Glow or Cold, Hard Cash? Social Identity Effects on Consumer Choice for Donation versus Discount Promotions" 48 (48): 855-868, 2011

    9 Kahneman, Daniel, "Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction" 22 (22): 57-70, 1992

    10 Wu, Amery D., "Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators" 87 (87): 367-392, 2007

    1 "팸퍼스"

    2 박소진, "번들가격할인 프레이밍과 메시지 프레이밍이 소비자의 번들구성제품에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향" 한국마케팅학회 13 (13): 55-77, 2011

    3 김동태, "기업연상과 브랜드 애호도간 이중 경로관계 모형" 한국마케팅학회 23 (23): 141-162, 2008

    4 김동태, "가격할인에 대한 지각된 공정성과 재 구매의도에 관한 연구 - 기존 구매자의 인지적, 감정적 반응을 중심으로 -" 한국소비자학회 21 (21): 1-27, 2010

    5 Aaker, Jennifer L., "When Good Brands Do Bad" 31 (31): 1-18, 2004

    6 Raghubir, Priya, "When Do Price Promotions Affect Brand Evaluation?" 36 (36): 211-222, 1999

    7 Cuddy, Amy J. C., "Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map" 40 : 61-149, 2008

    8 Winterich, Karen Page, "Warm Glow or Cold, Hard Cash? Social Identity Effects on Consumer Choice for Donation versus Discount Promotions" 48 (48): 855-868, 2011

    9 Kahneman, Daniel, "Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction" 22 (22): 57-70, 1992

    10 Wu, Amery D., "Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators" 87 (87): 367-392, 2007

    11 Roy, Donald P., "The impact of congruence in cause marketing campaigns for service firms" 24 (24): 255-263, 2010

    12 MacKenzie, Scott B., "The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations" 23 (23): 130-143, 1986

    13 Goldsmith, Ronald E., "The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity on Consumer Reactions to Ads and Brands" 29 (29): 43-54, 2000

    14 Strahilevitz, Michal, "The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-Linked Brand" 8 (8): 215-241, 1999

    15 Brown, T. J., "The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses" 61 (61): 68-84, 1997

    16 Cuddy, Amy J. C., "The BIAS Map: Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes" 92 (92): 631-648, 2007

    17 Bollen, K. A., "Structural equations with latent variables" Wiley 1989

    18 Anderson, J. C., "Structural Equation Modeling in Practices: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach" 103 (103): 411-423, 1988

    19 Keller, Kevin Lane, "Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 2nd ed." Prentice-Hall 2003

    20 Blattberg, Robert C., "Sales Promotions: Concepts, Methods and Strategies" Prentice Hall 1990

    21 Neslin, Scott A., "Sales Promotion, Relevant Knowledge Series" Marketing Science Institute 2002

    22 Nedungadi, Prakesh, "Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations" 17 (17): 263-276, 1990

    23 Henderson, Ty, "Promoting Brands Across Categories with a Social Cause: Implementing Effective Embedded Premium Programs" 74 (74): 41-60, 2010

    24 Cone, "Past, present, future: The 25th Anniversary of Cause Marketing"

    25 Bagozzi, R. P., "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models" 16 (16): 74-94, 1988

    26 Wojciszke, Bogdan, "On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation" 24 (24): 1245-1257, 1998

    27 Aaker, Jennifer L., "Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter" 47 (47): 224-237, 2010

    28 Walster, Elaine, "New Directions in Equity Research" 25 (25): 151-176, 1973

    29 Zauberman, Gal, "Memories as Assets: Strategic Memory Protection in Choice over Time" 35 (35): 715-728, 2009

    30 Grandey, Alicia, "Is ‘Service with a Smile’ Enough? Authenticity of Positive Displays during Service Encounters" 96 : 38-55, 2005

    31 Andreoni, James, "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm Glow Giving" 100 (100): 464-477, 1990

    32 Devine, Irene, "Implicit Claims: The Role of Corporate Reputation in Value Creation" 4 (4): 42-49, 2001

    33 Arora, Neeraj, "Embedded Premium Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective" 26 (26): 514-531, 2007

    34 Hoyer Wayne D., "Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat- Purchase Product" 17 (17): 141-148, 1990

    35 Strahilevitz, Michal, "Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell" 24 (24): 434-446, 1998

    36 Aaker, Jennifer L., "Dimensions of Brand Personality" 34 (34): 347-356, 1997

    37 Morrin, Maureen, "Determinants of Trademark Dilution" 33 (33): 248-257, 2006

    38 Markus, K., "Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation" 98 (98): 224-253, 1991

    39 Fiske, Alan Page, "Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology" McGraw-Hill 1998

    40 Campbell, Donald T., "Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix" 56 (56): 81-105, 1959

    41 Engel, J. F., "Consumer behavior" The Dryden Press 1990

    42 Rajagopal, Priyali, "Consumer Evaluations of Hybrid Products" 36 (36): 232-241, 2009

    43 Schiffman, L., "Consumer Behavior, 6th ed." Prentice-Hall 1997

    44 Cone, "Cone LLC Releases the 2010 Cone Cause Evolution Study"

    45 Krishna, Aradhna, "Cause Marketing: Spillover Effects of Cause-Related Products in a Product Portfolio" 55 (55): 1469-1485, 2009

    46 Aaker, David A., "Building Strong Brands" The Free Press 1996

    47 Aribarg, Anocha, "Brand Portfolio Promotions" 45 (45): 391-402, 2008

    48 Fishbein, Martin, "Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research" Addison-Wesley 1975

    49 Nies, Salome, "Are private label users attractive targets for retailer coupons?" 27 (27): 281-291, 2010

    50 Cohen, Jacob, "Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences" Lawrence Erlbaum 2003

    51 Cohen, Jacob, "Applied Multiple Regression: Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences" Erlbaum 1975

    52 Dawes, Robyn M., "Anomalies: Cooperation" 2 (2): 187-197, 1988

    53 Srinivasan, N., "An Empirical Test of an External Search for Automobiles" 18 (18): 233-242, 1991

    54 Abele, Andrea E., "Agency and Communion from the Perspective of Self versus Others" 93 (93): 751-763, 2007

    55 Shimp, Terence A., "A Program of Classical Conditioning Experiments Testing Variations in the Conditioned Stimulus and Context" 18 (18): 1-12, 1991

    56 Fiske, Susan. T., "A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Perceived Status and Competition" 82 (82): 878-902, 2002

    57 Lavidge, Robert J., "A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness" 25 (25): 59-62, 1961

    58 Iacobucci, Dawn, "A Meditation on Mediation: Evidence That Structural Equations Models Perform Better than Regressions" 17 (17): 139-153, 2007

    59 Boulding, William, "A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions" 30 (30): 7-27, 1993

    60 Fiske, Susan T., "(Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth" 55 (55): 473-489, 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-05-10 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Marketing Association KCI등재
    2019-04-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Marketing Review -> Korean Journal of Marketing KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.93 1.93 1.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.03 1.94 4.016 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼