RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 민주정치 발전을 위한 정치제도적 조건 = 제도적 상보성을 중심으로

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korean democracy is now more than 20 years old and there has been two power transitions between opposing parties. Most Koreans believe that there is no chance of the breakdown of Korean democracy and the turn to authoritarianism. Objectively, Korean democracy has been consolidated. At the same time, however, most Koreans are not satisfied with Korean democratic practice in the real world. Let's mention just several conspicuous examples: Adversarial confrontations are prevalent between the major parties resulting in political paralysis; presidents end up with their terms as another addition of a failed president; Representative democracy is in crisis; Political parties are subject to frequent realignments and they lack internal democracy within themselves; And people are sick and tired of physical violence of their representatives in the National Assembly. The present paper advances an argument that all these unwanted and unsatisfactory aspects of Korean democracy are based on an political institutional setting which lacks complementarity among its composing parts. Diverse institutions at different levels of the Korean political system provide conflicting incentives to politicians and produce non-conforming political activities, which prevents Korean democratic politics from moving toward an orderly and mature one and, instead, keeps political confrontation and paralysis as its repeating features. In order to overcome this state of affairs in Korean politics, we argue, constitutional amendments and political institutional reforms are to be carried out in such a way that institutional complementarity among Korean political institutions are strengthened. From this perspective, we propose 10 major institutional revisions that are needed in order to help the Korean presidential system of government function more smoothly and move towards a mature democracy.
    번역하기

    Korean democracy is now more than 20 years old and there has been two power transitions between opposing parties. Most Koreans believe that there is no chance of the breakdown of Korean democracy and the turn to authoritarianism. Objectively, Korean d...

    Korean democracy is now more than 20 years old and there has been two power transitions between opposing parties. Most Koreans believe that there is no chance of the breakdown of Korean democracy and the turn to authoritarianism. Objectively, Korean democracy has been consolidated. At the same time, however, most Koreans are not satisfied with Korean democratic practice in the real world. Let's mention just several conspicuous examples: Adversarial confrontations are prevalent between the major parties resulting in political paralysis; presidents end up with their terms as another addition of a failed president; Representative democracy is in crisis; Political parties are subject to frequent realignments and they lack internal democracy within themselves; And people are sick and tired of physical violence of their representatives in the National Assembly. The present paper advances an argument that all these unwanted and unsatisfactory aspects of Korean democracy are based on an political institutional setting which lacks complementarity among its composing parts. Diverse institutions at different levels of the Korean political system provide conflicting incentives to politicians and produce non-conforming political activities, which prevents Korean democratic politics from moving toward an orderly and mature one and, instead, keeps political confrontation and paralysis as its repeating features. In order to overcome this state of affairs in Korean politics, we argue, constitutional amendments and political institutional reforms are to be carried out in such a way that institutional complementarity among Korean political institutions are strengthened. From this perspective, we propose 10 major institutional revisions that are needed in order to help the Korean presidential system of government function more smoothly and move towards a mature democracy.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼