현대중국어 좌향전이 이중타동구문의 논항 실현 양상 고찰 = The Mechanism of Argument Realization of Left-Transfer Ditransitive Construction in Chinese

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this paper is to account for the mechanism of Chinese left-transfer ditransitive construction(also called malefactive source construction). In Chinese, a malefactive-source verb is a verb which can take a subject and two objects which refer to a theme and a recipient(source). According to linguistics considerations, these objects are called direct and indirect. This is in contrast to monotransitive verbs, which take only one object. In Chinese, it is common to differentiate the objects of a ditransitive verb using word order or context. The main idea of this paper is that the semantic prototype of ditransitivity is defined by the ‘the Maximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis’. According to the Maximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis, the A-R-T argument categories should be defined so as to be maximally semantically distinct.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 金瑛, "현대중국어 이중목적어구문의 어법특성 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2014

2 연재훈, "한국어 구문 유형론" 태학사 2011

3 Knud Lambrecht, "정보 구조와 문장 형식" 월인출판사 2000

4 백은희, "선진시기 이중목적어 구문의 의미지도와 논항 배열 규칙" 한국중국언어학회 (49) : 97-127, 2013

5 Simon C. Dik, "기능문법론" 홍익출판사 2006

6 강병규, "구문문법이론에 기초한 중국어 동사와 논항 실현 양상 고찰—이중타동구문을 중심으로" 한국중국어문학회 75 : 217-254, 2013

7 朱德熙, "語法講義" 商務印書館 1982

8 程樂樂, "現代漢語索取雙賓句硏究" 武漢大學出版社 2010

9 張伯江, "現代漢語的雙及物結構式" 3 : 1999

10 張國憲, "制約奪事成分句位實現的語義因素" 6 : 2001

11 陸儉明, "再談‘他吃了三個蘋果’一類結構的性質" 2011

12 Seppo Kittilä, "Transitivity: Towards a Comprehensive Typology" University of Turku 2002

13 Hopper, "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse" 56 : 1980

14 Margetts, "Three participant events in the languages of the world: towards a crosslinguistic typology" 45 : 2007

15 Malchukov, "Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook" Walter de Gruyter 2010

16 Ashild Næss, "Prototypical Transitivity" John Benjamins Publishing Company 2007

17 Adele E. Goldberg, "A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" The University of Chicago Press 1995