RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한스 켈젠의 法과 國家理論 - 켈젠의 스멘트의 統合理論에 대한 批判을 중심으로 - = Hans Kelsen’s Theory of Law and State - Focused on Kelsen’s Critical View of Smend’s Integration Theory(Integrationslehre) -

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the history of modern legal thought, Hans Kelsen has aroused more response than any other jurist. His prolific writings have been published in 24 languages. Kelsen’s earlier work was devoted mainly to basic problems of law and the state; it is in this area that his theories have aroused passionate controversy.
    Among the early intellectual influences on Kelsen’s legal thought, Kant must be given first place, although it was Kantianism as renewed by Neo-Kantians like Hermann Cohen and Ernst Cassirer.
    From Kant Kelsen acquired a deeply felt sense of the importance of methodological purity: according to his view, the method of cognition determines the objection of cognition.
    In the defining the meaning of law, Kelsen attempted to determine whether there is any one element common to all legal systems at all times and places and every level of cultural development. In his search for a conception of law that is based on scientific univerality rather than on political particularism.
    The constitutive element of law as a coercive social order is the norm or the rule that somebody ought to act in a prescribed way. The structure of the legal norm clearly shows its difference from the moral norm.
    The basic norm(Grundnorm) supplies the legal order with a principle of unity. The concept of basic norm led Kelsen to the dynamic view of the law as hierachically held together.
    Rudolf Smend developed his integration theories of constitutional law and the state in the light of sociological and mental scierntific method. Smend made struggle against the traditional theory of legal positivism. He rejected clearly Kelsen’s normativism.
    The state is seen by Smend a living sprirtual and political life reality, Smend asserted that the state is the process of social integration, the state develops through the dynamic relation of each individual citizen’s will with that of communty at large. The constitution is a legal order of the political life reality of the state.
    Kelsen is a critic of Smend. Kelsen’s work 'The State as Integration - a principle confrontation -'(Der Staat als Integration - eine prinzipielle Auseinandusetzung -) is a confrontation between his pure theory of law and Smend’s integration theory. In the light of his pure theory of law Kelsen rejected Smend’s legal theory. Kelsen’s critique of Smend’s theory is the main contents in this article. Smend’s ideas had a profound influence on jurists of constitutional law, notably Konrad Hesse.
    번역하기

    In the history of modern legal thought, Hans Kelsen has aroused more response than any other jurist. His prolific writings have been published in 24 languages. Kelsen’s earlier work was devoted mainly to basic problems of law and the state; it is in...

    In the history of modern legal thought, Hans Kelsen has aroused more response than any other jurist. His prolific writings have been published in 24 languages. Kelsen’s earlier work was devoted mainly to basic problems of law and the state; it is in this area that his theories have aroused passionate controversy.
    Among the early intellectual influences on Kelsen’s legal thought, Kant must be given first place, although it was Kantianism as renewed by Neo-Kantians like Hermann Cohen and Ernst Cassirer.
    From Kant Kelsen acquired a deeply felt sense of the importance of methodological purity: according to his view, the method of cognition determines the objection of cognition.
    In the defining the meaning of law, Kelsen attempted to determine whether there is any one element common to all legal systems at all times and places and every level of cultural development. In his search for a conception of law that is based on scientific univerality rather than on political particularism.
    The constitutive element of law as a coercive social order is the norm or the rule that somebody ought to act in a prescribed way. The structure of the legal norm clearly shows its difference from the moral norm.
    The basic norm(Grundnorm) supplies the legal order with a principle of unity. The concept of basic norm led Kelsen to the dynamic view of the law as hierachically held together.
    Rudolf Smend developed his integration theories of constitutional law and the state in the light of sociological and mental scierntific method. Smend made struggle against the traditional theory of legal positivism. He rejected clearly Kelsen’s normativism.
    The state is seen by Smend a living sprirtual and political life reality, Smend asserted that the state is the process of social integration, the state develops through the dynamic relation of each individual citizen’s will with that of communty at large. The constitution is a legal order of the political life reality of the state.
    Kelsen is a critic of Smend. Kelsen’s work 'The State as Integration - a principle confrontation -'(Der Staat als Integration - eine prinzipielle Auseinandusetzung -) is a confrontation between his pure theory of law and Smend’s integration theory. In the light of his pure theory of law Kelsen rejected Smend’s legal theory. Kelsen’s critique of Smend’s theory is the main contents in this article. Smend’s ideas had a profound influence on jurists of constitutional law, notably Konrad Hesse.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "헌재 2001l 2. 22, 99헌마613"

    2 "헌재 1996. 2. 16, 96헌가2, 96헌바13병합"

    3 한태연, "헌법학" 법문사 72-, 1983

    4 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법(중)" 9-12,

    5 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법(상)" 박영사 148-, 1983

    6 정하중, "행정법총론" 법문사 154-, 2005

    7 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 31-, 2007

    8 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 132-,

    9 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" 141-,

    10 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 653-, 2007

    1 "헌재 2001l 2. 22, 99헌마613"

    2 "헌재 1996. 2. 16, 96헌가2, 96헌바13병합"

    3 한태연, "헌법학" 법문사 72-, 1983

    4 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법(중)" 9-12,

    5 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법(상)" 박영사 148-, 1983

    6 정하중, "행정법총론" 법문사 154-, 2005

    7 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 31-, 2007

    8 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 132-,

    9 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" 141-,

    10 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 653-, 2007

    11 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 306-, 2007

    12 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 18-, 2007

    13 한스 켈젠, "통합으로서의 국가 - 하나의 원리적 대결 -" 법문사 1994

    14 심헌섭, "켈젠법이론선집" 법문사 280-, 1990

    15 콘라드ㆍ헷세, "서독헌법원론" 삼영사 40-, 1985

    16 라드브르흐, "법철학" 삼영사 117-, 1979

    17 김용규, "법사상사강의" 계명대 출판부 200-, 1995

    18 최종고, "법사상사" 박영사 326-, 2002

    19 호프만ㆍ뢰쉬, "독일문학사" 일신사 233-, 1994

    20 서원우, "공법학연습" 347-,

    21 Schmitt, "Über die drei Arten des rechtswissenschaftlichen Denkens, Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt" Hamburg 14-, 1934

    22 P. Häberle, "Öffentliche Interessen als juristisches Problem : Eine Analyse von Gesetzgebung und Rechtssprechung" 95-, 1970

    23 M. Weber, "Wirtschaft und Geselleschaft, 5. Aufl." J. C. B. Mohr 174-, 1972

    24 Kelsen, "Was ist die Reine Rechtslehre, in: Die Wiener rechtstheoretische Schule, Bd. Ⅰ" 22-, 1968

    25 H. Kelsen, "Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie, 2. Aufl." Neudruck 101-, 1963

    26 R. Smend, "Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht, in: Staatliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufeätze, 2. Aufl" Duncker & Humblot 142-170, 1968

    27 R. Smend, "Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht" Duncker & Humblot 484-, 1968

    28 Smend, "Verfassang und Verfassungsrecht" 164-165,

    29 정영수, "Theodor Litt의 정치교육사상" 15 : 357-372, 1989

    30 R. Pound, "The Spirit of Common Law" Boston 46-, 1925

    31 H. J. Laski, "The Pluratistic State, in: Foundations of Sovereignty and other Essays" George Allen & Unwin, Ltd. 232-, 1931

    32 G. Winkler, "Sein und Sollen, Rechtstheorie(Zeitschrift für Logik, Methodenlehre und Soziologie des Rechts)" 252-, 1976

    33 K. Hesse, "Rechtsstaat im Verfassungssystem des Grundgesetzes, in: Staatsverfassung und Kirchenordnung, Festgabe für Rudolf Smend zum 80" Geburtstag 86-, 1962

    34 C. Schmitt, "Legalität und Legitimität, In Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze" Duncker & Humblot 264-, 1973

    35 C. Schmitt, "Legalität und Legimität, in: Verfassungsrechtliche Aussätze, 2. Aufl." Dunken & Hunblot 345-, 1973

    36 David L. Sills, "International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences" The Macmillan Company & The Free Press 362-, 1979

    37 John Plamenatz, "Ideology" Pall Mall Press 29-, 1970

    38 K. Hesse, "Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts, der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 8. Aufl." C. F. Müller 205-, 1975

    39 Joseph H. Kaiser, "Einige Umrisse des deutschen Staatsdenkens seit Weimar, In AöR(Bd. 108)" Tübingen 12-, 1983

    40 Kelsen, "Die philosophische Grundlagen der Naturrechtslehre und des Rechtspositivismus" Die Wiener rechtstheoretische Schule 338-,

    41 Anschütz, "Die Verfassung des deutschen Reiches, 14. Aufl." Erl. zu Art 77-, 1933

    42 H. Kelsen, "Die Grundlage der Naturrechtslehre, In Das Naturrecht in der politischen Theorie" 1-4, 1963

    43 O. Kirchheimer, "Die Grenzen der Enteignung, in: Funktionen des Staates und Verfassung, 1. Aufl." Frankfurt a. M. 256-, 1972

    44 Otto Kimminich, "Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte" Frankfurta. M 456-457, 1970

    45 F. Neumann, "Der Funktionswandel des Gesetzes im Recht der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, In Demokratischer und autoritärer Staat" Europäische Verlagsanstalt 13-, 1967

    46 G. Meyer, "Der Begriff des Gesetzes und die rechtliche Natur des Staatshaushalts" 15-,

    47 H. Heller, "Der Begriff des Gesetzes in der Reichsverfassung, In VVDStRL(Heft4)" De Gruyer 90-,

    48 R. Zippelius, "Das Wesen des Rechts, 4. Aufl." C. H. Beck 1-, 1978

    49 Laband, "Das Staatsrecht des Deutschen Reiches, 5. Aufl." 18-,

    50 Erhard Denninger, "Das Rechtsstaatsprinzip, in: Staatrecht 1, Rowoht Taschenbuch" Hamburg 94-, 1973

    51 Smend, "Das Problem der Institutionen und der Staat, in: Staatliche Abhanlungen und andere Aufsätze" 516-,

    52 J. Rousseau, "Contra Social, liv, Ⅱ chap. Ⅵ"

    53 H. Maurer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 10. Aufl." C. H. Beck 58-,

    54 H. Kelsen, "Allgemeine Staatslehre" Berlin 14-, 1966

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
    2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼