RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    특허법상 조약우선권제도에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Right of Priority under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76483222

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The right to priority can only be claimed by the applicant of the priority application, or by a person to whom the right to priority has been transferred. This right can be transferred independently from the priority application itself, but it cannot be transferred to two different persons. The earlier application must be made in or for a State party to the Paris Convention. The earlier application may be for a patent or for the registration of a utility model or for a utility certificate or for an inventor's certificate.
    Any filing that is sufficient (under national law in the country where filed) to establish the date on which the application was filed, gives rise to a right to priority. It does not matter what the outcome of the application was. For example, it may subsequently be abandoned or refused or be deemed withdrawn for failure to pay any fee. The application claiming priority of an earlier application must relate to the same invention as the earlier application. The right of priority exists for any matter disclosed in the earlier application as a whole, not just for matter claimed in the earlier application.
    The application whose priority is claimed must be the first application in or for that State to disclose the subject matter in question. If there are two applications disclosing the same subject matter, priority from the second application may only be claimed if the first application has been withdrawn, abandoned or refused on the date the second application was filed. The first application may not have been open to public inspection or have left any rights outstanding. The first application may never have served and may not thereafter serve as a basis for claiming a right of priority. The first application must have been filed by the same applicant (inventors irrelevant) as the second application.
    To gain the benefit of priority, the applicant must file a declaration of priority. The declaration of priority shall state the date of the previous filing and the State in or for which it was made and shall indicate the file number. A priority claim is valid if the subject-matter of the claim can be derived directly and unambiguously from the disclosure of the invention in the priority document, when account is taken of any features implicit to a person skilled in the art in what is expressly mentioned in the document.
    번역하기

    The right to priority can only be claimed by the applicant of the priority application, or by a person to whom the right to priority has been transferred. This right can be transferred independently from the priority application itself, but it cannot ...

    The right to priority can only be claimed by the applicant of the priority application, or by a person to whom the right to priority has been transferred. This right can be transferred independently from the priority application itself, but it cannot be transferred to two different persons. The earlier application must be made in or for a State party to the Paris Convention. The earlier application may be for a patent or for the registration of a utility model or for a utility certificate or for an inventor's certificate.
    Any filing that is sufficient (under national law in the country where filed) to establish the date on which the application was filed, gives rise to a right to priority. It does not matter what the outcome of the application was. For example, it may subsequently be abandoned or refused or be deemed withdrawn for failure to pay any fee. The application claiming priority of an earlier application must relate to the same invention as the earlier application. The right of priority exists for any matter disclosed in the earlier application as a whole, not just for matter claimed in the earlier application.
    The application whose priority is claimed must be the first application in or for that State to disclose the subject matter in question. If there are two applications disclosing the same subject matter, priority from the second application may only be claimed if the first application has been withdrawn, abandoned or refused on the date the second application was filed. The first application may not have been open to public inspection or have left any rights outstanding. The first application may never have served and may not thereafter serve as a basis for claiming a right of priority. The first application must have been filed by the same applicant (inventors irrelevant) as the second application.
    To gain the benefit of priority, the applicant must file a declaration of priority. The declaration of priority shall state the date of the previous filing and the State in or for which it was made and shall indicate the file number. A priority claim is valid if the subject-matter of the claim can be derived directly and unambiguously from the disclosure of the invention in the priority document, when account is taken of any features implicit to a person skilled in the art in what is expressly mentioned in the document.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 개 요
    • Ⅱ. 파리조약에서의 조약우선권제도
    • Ⅲ. 조약우선권주장의 요건
    • Ⅳ. 결 론
    • 참 고 문 헌
    • Ⅰ. 개 요
    • Ⅱ. 파리조약에서의 조약우선권제도
    • Ⅲ. 조약우선권주장의 요건
    • Ⅳ. 결 론
    • 참 고 문 헌
    • 【ABSTRACT】
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 吉藤幸朔, "특허법개설 제13판" 대광서림 2000

    2 "특허법 제4판" 한빛지적소유권센터 2001

    3 "특허법 개정2판" 2001

    4 "지적소유권법" 육법사 2001

    5 "심사지침서 2002" 특허청

    6 "생명공학분야 특허심사기준" 특허청

    7 "u Fragen der Identität zwischen Vor- und Nachanmeldung bei Beanspruchung der Unionspriorität" 1960

    8 "Zur Patentierbarkeit von Züchtungen" 644-, 1969

    9 "Zum relevanten Offenbarungsgehalt von Prioritätsanmeldungen nach Art.4 H Pariser Verbandsübereinkunft" 1995

    10 "Violations of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property" 1980

    1 吉藤幸朔, "특허법개설 제13판" 대광서림 2000

    2 "특허법 제4판" 한빛지적소유권센터 2001

    3 "특허법 개정2판" 2001

    4 "지적소유권법" 육법사 2001

    5 "심사지침서 2002" 특허청

    6 "생명공학분야 특허심사기준" 특허청

    7 "u Fragen der Identität zwischen Vor- und Nachanmeldung bei Beanspruchung der Unionspriorität" 1960

    8 "Zur Patentierbarkeit von Züchtungen" 644-, 1969

    9 "Zum relevanten Offenbarungsgehalt von Prioritätsanmeldungen nach Art.4 H Pariser Verbandsübereinkunft" 1995

    10 "Violations of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property" 1980

    11 "Verbesserungserfindung und Zusatzpatente im Priorität der Pariser Verbandsübereinkunft" 869-, 1989

    12 "Veröffentlichungen im Prioritätsintervall - eine Erwiderung" 456-, 1998

    13 "Unionspriorität und inhaltliche Änderung der Voranmeldung" 1974

    14 "Report of Tokyo High Court Case of Patentability" 155-, 1994

    15 "Probleme der Unionspriorität im Patentrecht" 255-, 1991

    16 "Priorität und Erfindungsidentität nach der Entscheidung der Großen Beschwerdekammer des EPA in der Sache G 2/98" 2002

    17 Bodenhausen, "Pariser Verbandsübereinkunft zum Schutz des gewerblichen Eigentums" 1971

    18 "Lehrbuch des Patentrechts" 1986

    19 "Gentechnologie und gewerblicher Rechtsschutz" 25 : 133

    20 "Genetische Erfindungen im gewerblichen Rechtsschutz" 1988

    21 "Fragen der Unionspriorität im Patentrecht" 1967

    22 "Europäisches Patentübereinkommen-Münchener Gemeinschaftskommentar" 23 :

    23 "Ethische, rechtliche und wirtschaftliche Probleme des Patent- und Sortenschutzes für die biotechnologische Tierzüchtung und Tierproduktion" 1990

    24 "EPÜ(Europäisches Patentübereinkommen)" 2002

    25 "Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions)"

    26 "Die Unionspriorität im Patentrecht" 1975

    27 "Das Erfordernis der Offenbarung für die Geltendmachung der Unionspriorität in den USA" 1974

    28 "Anmeldetag und Priorität im europäischen Patentrecht" 1983

    29 "178 USPQ 165" 1974

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.11 1.11 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.99 1.176 0.45
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼