RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    창세기 2-3장의 히브리어아롬(~Ar['), 아룸(~Wr['), 에롬(~roy[e):그 의미들과 번역들, 그리고 그 절묘한 언어유희의 의도 = `ārôm(~Ar['), `ārûm(~Wr['), and `êrôm(~roy[e): Their Meanings and Translations, and the Intention of the Exquisite Paronomasia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104217071

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Creation account of Genesis 2 and the Fall account of Genesis 3 are not only naturally related to each other but also dramatically contrasted by a rhetorical technique called paronomasia as shown in the three Hebrew terms `ārôm (~Ar[', 2:25), `ārûm (~Wr[', 3:1), and `êrôm (~roy[e, 3:7, 10, 11). Unfortunately, however, this fact has been misinterpreted, as well as totally or partially overlooked.
    The purpose of this research was to investigate the usage of the three Hebrew terms in the Old Testament, to decide their meanings in each of their contexts, to check the suitability of their translations, and finally to perceive the intention shown in the delicate wordplay the three Hebrew words create. The research was done mainly from the synchronic/literary perspective, while keeping in mind possible changes in their meanings through the ages. The results can be recapitulated as follows:First, the Hebrew term `ārûm employed for the description of the serpent in Genesis 3:1 is used obviously with a positive connotation and thus should not be translated as “cunning” or “subtle,” but “clever” or “wise.” The usage of `ārûm in Genesis 3:1 may be a double entendre, connoting not only the “wise” serpent as the instrument of the Fall but also the “cunning” Tempter who made the serpent his instrument. In that case, however, there is no way to translate it suitably.
    Second, the Hebrew term `êrôm (pl. `êrummîm) used in describing the post-Fall Adam and his wife in Genesis 3:7, 10, 11 means ‘complete nakedness’ of shame and humiliation, with genitals exposed, of which the meaning is clearly shown in Genesis 3 itself, and especially in Ezekiel 16:7 and 23:29, and thus it should be properly translated as “naked” or “nude.”Third, the Hebrew term `ārôm, chosen to describe the pre-Fall Adam and his wife predominantly connotes ‘partial nakedness’ in other contexts, but not ‘total nakedness,’ and thus should be contextually translated as “lightly dressed,” “poorly clothed,” or “in undergarments only.” The word `ārôm (pl. `arûmmīm) in Genesis 2:25 has been interpreted to mean their pre-Fall childlike innocence, but it rather seems to portray their being clothed with light, being in the “image of God,” just as God wraps Himself with light as with a garment (Ps 104:2). However, their robe of light must have departed forever soon after the Fall, and consequently they became `êrôm (pl. `êrumîm), that is, completely “naked.” Therefore, the translation “naked” is not suitable for depicting their being clothed with light, but there is no proper translation of this word that denotes “robe of light.”Last but not least, the reason for employing `ārûm in Genesis 3:1 instead of ḥāḵām (~kx, “clever, wise”) or śākal (lk;f', “be prudent, have insight”) must be for the rhetorical technique of the wordplay that it makes with `arûmmīm (sg. `ārôm) in 2:25 and `êrummîm (sg. `êrôm) in 3:7, 10, 11. The paronomasia that `ārôm (pl. `arûmmīm, Gen 2:25), `ārûm (3:1), and `êrôm (pl. `êrummîm, 3:7, 10, 11) make may be intended to bring into prominence the point of departure for the tragic event of the Fall, dramatically contrasting the pre-Fall human appearance (`ārôm) with the post-Fall human appearance (`êrôm), as well as naturally connecting the Creation account in Genesis 2 with the Fall account in Genesis 3.
    번역하기

    The Creation account of Genesis 2 and the Fall account of Genesis 3 are not only naturally related to each other but also dramatically contrasted by a rhetorical technique called paronomasia as shown in the three Hebrew terms `ārôm (~Ar[', 2:25), `�...

    The Creation account of Genesis 2 and the Fall account of Genesis 3 are not only naturally related to each other but also dramatically contrasted by a rhetorical technique called paronomasia as shown in the three Hebrew terms `ārôm (~Ar[', 2:25), `ārûm (~Wr[', 3:1), and `êrôm (~roy[e, 3:7, 10, 11). Unfortunately, however, this fact has been misinterpreted, as well as totally or partially overlooked.
    The purpose of this research was to investigate the usage of the three Hebrew terms in the Old Testament, to decide their meanings in each of their contexts, to check the suitability of their translations, and finally to perceive the intention shown in the delicate wordplay the three Hebrew words create. The research was done mainly from the synchronic/literary perspective, while keeping in mind possible changes in their meanings through the ages. The results can be recapitulated as follows:First, the Hebrew term `ārûm employed for the description of the serpent in Genesis 3:1 is used obviously with a positive connotation and thus should not be translated as “cunning” or “subtle,” but “clever” or “wise.” The usage of `ārûm in Genesis 3:1 may be a double entendre, connoting not only the “wise” serpent as the instrument of the Fall but also the “cunning” Tempter who made the serpent his instrument. In that case, however, there is no way to translate it suitably.
    Second, the Hebrew term `êrôm (pl. `êrummîm) used in describing the post-Fall Adam and his wife in Genesis 3:7, 10, 11 means ‘complete nakedness’ of shame and humiliation, with genitals exposed, of which the meaning is clearly shown in Genesis 3 itself, and especially in Ezekiel 16:7 and 23:29, and thus it should be properly translated as “naked” or “nude.”Third, the Hebrew term `ārôm, chosen to describe the pre-Fall Adam and his wife predominantly connotes ‘partial nakedness’ in other contexts, but not ‘total nakedness,’ and thus should be contextually translated as “lightly dressed,” “poorly clothed,” or “in undergarments only.” The word `ārôm (pl. `arûmmīm) in Genesis 2:25 has been interpreted to mean their pre-Fall childlike innocence, but it rather seems to portray their being clothed with light, being in the “image of God,” just as God wraps Himself with light as with a garment (Ps 104:2). However, their robe of light must have departed forever soon after the Fall, and consequently they became `êrôm (pl. `êrumîm), that is, completely “naked.” Therefore, the translation “naked” is not suitable for depicting their being clothed with light, but there is no proper translation of this word that denotes “robe of light.”Last but not least, the reason for employing `ārûm in Genesis 3:1 instead of ḥāḵām (~kx, “clever, wise”) or śākal (lk;f', “be prudent, have insight”) must be for the rhetorical technique of the wordplay that it makes with `arûmmīm (sg. `ārôm) in 2:25 and `êrummîm (sg. `êrôm) in 3:7, 10, 11. The paronomasia that `ārôm (pl. `arûmmīm, Gen 2:25), `ārûm (3:1), and `êrôm (pl. `êrummîm, 3:7, 10, 11) make may be intended to bring into prominence the point of departure for the tragic event of the Fall, dramatically contrasting the pre-Fall human appearance (`ārôm) with the post-Fall human appearance (`êrôm), as well as naturally connecting the Creation account in Genesis 2 with the Fall account in Genesis 3.

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 논문은 창세기 2-3장의 히브리어 아롬(~Ar['), 아룸(~Wr[), 에롬(~roy[e)에 대한 어휘 연구를 통해 그 정확한 번역들을 제시하고, 그 언어유희의 의도를 파악하는데 그 목적을 둔다. 필자는 시대적 흐름에 따른 의미 변화의 유무를 염두에 두면서도 주로 공시적/문학적 관점에서 연구를 진행함으로써 에롬을 제외하고 아롬과 아룸은 기존의 번역들을 재고해야 할 필요성을 발견하고 그 언어유희의 의도를 파악한다.
    번역하기

    본 논문은 창세기 2-3장의 히브리어 아롬(~Ar['), 아룸(~Wr[), 에롬(~roy[e)에 대한 어휘 연구를 통해 그 정확한 번역들을 제시하고, 그 언어유희의 의도를 파악하는데 그 목적을 둔다. 필자는 시대...

    본 논문은 창세기 2-3장의 히브리어 아롬(~Ar['), 아룸(~Wr[), 에롬(~roy[e)에 대한 어휘 연구를 통해 그 정확한 번역들을 제시하고, 그 언어유희의 의도를 파악하는데 그 목적을 둔다. 필자는 시대적 흐름에 따른 의미 변화의 유무를 염두에 두면서도 주로 공시적/문학적 관점에서 연구를 진행함으로써 에롬을 제외하고 아롬과 아룸은 기존의 번역들을 재고해야 할 필요성을 발견하고 그 언어유희의 의도를 파악한다.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김래용, "하박국서에 나타난 미쉬파트(jP'v.m) 연구" 한국구약학회 19 (19): 99-125, 2013

    2 남대극, "창세기 1장의 번역과 의미" 2 : 7-23, 1996

    3 오택현, "제2이사야‘ 야웨의 종의 노래’에 나타난 미쉬파트(jP’v.mi)" 7 : 47-67, 1999

    4 김진규, "잠언에 나타난 ‘마스킬’의 번역의 문제" 한국구약학회 18 (18): 60-81, 2012

    5 김경래, "신체와 관련된 히브리어 관용어 연구" 3 : 25-57, 1997

    6 소형근, "노라(Nora) 비문과 구약성서에 나타난 ‘나기드’(די )의 연구" 한국구약학회 14 (14): 145-162, 2008

    7 정연호, "구약성경과 유대교의 속죄와 '쩨다카'" 한국구약학회 16 (16): 161-189, 2010

    8 Luc, Alex T, "~t[" 3 : 539-541,

    9 Allen, Ronald B, "~ro[' (`ārōm) Beware, Take crafty counsel, Be prudent" 2 : 697-698,

    10 Niehr, Herbert, "~r:[' `āram; ~Wr[' `ārûm; hm'r>[ `ormâ" 11 : 361-366,

    1 김래용, "하박국서에 나타난 미쉬파트(jP'v.m) 연구" 한국구약학회 19 (19): 99-125, 2013

    2 남대극, "창세기 1장의 번역과 의미" 2 : 7-23, 1996

    3 오택현, "제2이사야‘ 야웨의 종의 노래’에 나타난 미쉬파트(jP’v.mi)" 7 : 47-67, 1999

    4 김진규, "잠언에 나타난 ‘마스킬’의 번역의 문제" 한국구약학회 18 (18): 60-81, 2012

    5 김경래, "신체와 관련된 히브리어 관용어 연구" 3 : 25-57, 1997

    6 소형근, "노라(Nora) 비문과 구약성서에 나타난 ‘나기드’(די )의 연구" 한국구약학회 14 (14): 145-162, 2008

    7 정연호, "구약성경과 유대교의 속죄와 '쩨다카'" 한국구약학회 16 (16): 161-189, 2010

    8 Luc, Alex T, "~t[" 3 : 539-541,

    9 Allen, Ronald B, "~ro[' (`ārōm) Beware, Take crafty counsel, Be prudent" 2 : 697-698,

    10 Niehr, Herbert, "~r:[' `āram; ~Wr[' `ārûm; hm'r>[ `ormâ" 11 : 361-366,

    11 Niehr, Herbert, "~Ar[' `ārôm; ~Ary[e `êrôm.”" 11 : 349-354,

    12 Seevers, Boyd V, "~Ar[" 3 : 532-533,

    13 Zimmerli, Walther, "zur Structur der alttestamentlicher Weisheit" 51 : 177-204, 1933

    14 Schultz, Carl, "rW[ (`ûr) II, Be exposed, Laid bare" 2 : 656-657,

    15 Niehr, Herbert, "hr[ `ārâ; hr’Am maár; r[;m; ma`erwâ; ”r>[< `erw;`eryá" 11 : 343-349,

    16 Allen, Ronald B, "hr[ (`ārâ) Uncover, Leave destitute, Discover, Empty, Raze, Pour out" 2 : 695-,

    17 Seevers, Boyd V, "har" 3 : 527-531,

    18 Ojewole, Afolarin Olutunde, "The Seed in Genesis 3:15: An Exegetical and Intertextual Study" Andrews University, Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary 2002

    19 Koehler, Ludwig, "The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament" E. J. Brill 1994

    20 Young, Edward J, "The Book of Isaiah: The English Text, with Introduction, Exposition, and Notes. Vol. 2" Eerdmans 1969

    21 Hamilton, Victor P, "The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17, In NICOT" Eerdmans 1990

    22 Horgan, Maurya P, "Pesharim: Qumran Interpretations of Biblical Books" Catholic Biblical Association of America 1979

    23 Les tre, H, "Nudité, In Suppl ment au Dictionnire de la Bible" Librairie Letouzey 1712-1714, 1985

    24 Rudolf, Wilhelm, "Micha-Nahum-Habakuk-Zephanja. KAT. neue Reihe. Band 13/3" Gerd Mohn 1975

    25 Lisowski, Gerhard, "Konkordanz zum Hebr ischen Alten Testament" Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft 1981

    26 Davidson, Richard M, "Human Sexuality in the Hebrew Bible" 49 (49): 20-26, 2002

    27 Francis Brown, "Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament" Clarendon Press 1907

    28 Sailhamer, John H, "Genesis Unbound: A Provocative New Look at the Creation Account" Questar Publishers, Inc 1996

    29 Collins, C. John, "Genesis 1-4: A Linguistic, Literary, and Theological Commentary" P&R 2006

    30 Wenham, Gordon J, "Genesis 1-15, In WBC. Vol. 1" Word Books 1987

    31 Büklen, Ernst, "Die Verwandtschaft der j disch-christlichen mit der Parsischen Eschatologie" Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1902

    32 Keil, Carl F., "Commentary on the Old Testament. Vol. 2" Eerdmans 1982

    33 Keil, Carl F., "Commentary on the Old Testament. Vol. 1" Eerdmans 1983

    34 James B. Pritchard, "Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament" Princeton University Press 1969

    35 Jastrow, Marcus, "A Dictionary of the Targumim, Talmud Babli, Yerushalmi and Midrashic Literature" Judaica 1971

    36 Skinner, John, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Genesis, In ICC. Vol. 1" T & T Clark 1930

    37 Cassuto, Umberto, "A Commentary on the Book of Genesis: Part 1, From Adam to Noah, Genesis 1-6:8" Magnes 1961

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-04-20 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Old Testament Society -> Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies KCI등재
    2017-03-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Old Testament Society -> Korean Society of Old Testament Studies KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.72 0.72 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.62 0.58 0.788 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼