區系類型論과 중국 동북지방의 고고학-중국 동북지방 고고학에 대한 이론적 접근- = Su Bingqi's Cultural Regional System Theory and the Contemporary Archaeology of the North-eastern Part of China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, author analyses Su Bingqi's Cultural Regional System Theory(Quxiliuxinglun, CRST as belows), which is regarded the main theory for contemporary archaeology of the north-eastern part of China. The main idea of CRST is to develop chronological sequence and the regional boundaries of culture in all provinces of China, based on the stratigraphy and typology. The CRST is similar to the culture-historical approach, which was main archaeological stream in Euroupe and America in 1920~40 years. But, the CRST differs from the culture-historical approach in its attention to the lineage of prehistorical archaeological cultures to the chinese history.
We can assume the reason why CRST could spread over in Chinese archaeology as belows. 1) CRST pays attention to the archaeology of peripherical regions, so this theory could easily accepted to the archaeologists in peripherical provinces like north-eastern part of China. 2) The ideological conflict in 1955~58 years and the Cultural Revolution strongly prohibited the development of archaeological methods. So, the acception of Su' Bingqi's CRST, which emphases on the basic archaeological methods in archaeology was reasonable to chinese archaeologists. 3) The rising of regional paradigms in chinese archaeology from the end of 1970's. 4) From the 1980's CRST changed to the Guwenhuaguchengguguo(ancient culture-fortress-state theory), a adapted social development theory in China. The Guwenhuaguchengguguo could manage to harmonize the CRST with the traditional historiographical view of China.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 范文瀾, "歷史硏究必須厚今薄古" 8期 : 5-9, 1958

2 朱乃誠, "略談蘇秉琦晩年的學術硏究主線-蘇秉琦與中國文明起源硏究之一" 1期 : 18-21, 2004a

3 郭大順, "論考古學文化區系理論在實踐中的發展,蘇秉琦與21世紀中國考古學" 2001

4 송호정, "한국 고대사 속의 고조선사" 푸른역사 2003

5 강인욱, "요령지방 비파형동검문화에 대한 일고찰" 21 : 1996

6 복기대, "마성자문화의 몇 가지 문제에 대하여" 한국고대학회 22 : 2005

7 브루스 트리거, "고고학사 사상과 이론" 학연문화사 1997

8 知原, "面向大地的求索20世紀的中國考古學" 文物出版社 287-292, 1999

9 "關于重建中國史前史的思考" 科學出版社 1-11, 1995

10 --- 外, "關于考古學文化的區系類型問題" 5期 : 1981

11 "關于仰韶文化的若干問題" 19651984文物出版

12 "蘇秉琦開展中國文明起源硏究的思想發?過程-蘇秉琦與中國文明起源硏究之二" 2期 : 4-8, 2004b

13 "蘇秉琦重建中國史前史的勞力和中國文明起源硏究 蘇秉琦與中國文明起源硏 究之四" 4期 : 21-25, 2004d

14 宿白, "蘇秉琦與當代中國考古學" 2001

15 "蘇秉琦20世紀80年代後期的中國文明起源硏究-蘇秉琦與中國文明起源硏究之 三" 3期 : 4-11, 2004c

16 曹兵武, "聚落 城址 部落 古國 張學海談海岱考古與中國文明起源" 2期 : 9-17, 2004

17 夏?, "考古工作也要厚今薄古" 6期 : 1-4, 1958

18 杜正勝, "考古學與中國古代史硏究-一個方法學的探討" 4期 : 335-346, 1992

19 "燕山南北地區考古-在遼寧朝陽召開的燕山南北" 1983

20 "從輝縣發掘報告看考古界的資産階級方向" 1-10, 1958

21 岡村秀典, "展望考古學-考古學硏究會40周年記念論集" 考古學硏究會. 1995

22 張忠培, "地層學與類型學的若干問題" 5期 : 1983

23 "中國考古學的重要奠基人與中國考古學新時代的開拓者" 4期 : 2-4, 1997

24 陳星, "中國史前考古學史硏究 1895-1949" 三聯書店 1997

25 郭沫若, "中國古代社會硏究" 1930

26 Willey G, "the Concern with Context and Function A History of American Archaeology" Freeman and Company 19931940~60

27 "The regionalist paradigm in Chinese archaeology, Nationalism, Politics, and the Practince of Archaeology" Cambridge Univ Press 198--217, 1995

28 London, "The Prehistory of Scotland" 1935

29 Fried M, "The Evolution of Political Society - an Essay in Political Anthropology" Random House 1967

30 London, "The Dawn of European Civilization" 1939

31 Childe, "The Danube in Prehistory" Oxford University Press 1929

32 a bibliographical survey, "Serials on Chinese Archaeology published in the People's Republic of China" 247-295, 1992

33 Oxford, "On the historiographical orientation of Chinese archaeology" 839-67 849, 1993

34 Gordon R, "Method and Theory in American Archaeology Univ of Chicago Press" 1958

35 Gilman, "Marxism in American archaeology Archaeological Thought in America" Cambridge University Press 63-73, 1989

36 Dolukhanov P. M, "Archaeology in Russia and archaeological theory" Routledge, 327-342, 1995