RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      다문화 사회를 위한 귀환이주 전승 = Traditions of Return Migration for a Multi-cultural Society

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104144378

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to argue that return migration is a key theme in the book of Ruth, while emphasizing the importance of return migration in a multi-cultural society. In particular, this study will refocus the character of Ruth as a return migrant, rather than a simple migrant. Finally, the Davidic royal genealogy(Ruth 4:18-22) will be reinterpreted in terms of this return migration.
      When analyzing the structure of the book of Ruth, it can be found that the story of Naomi, rather than the story of Ruth, occupies the core and the return migration story of Naomi forms the center of the structure. Although Ruth's identity as a foreign woman is combined with her identity as Naomi's daughter-in-law, it is clear that Ruth returns with Naomi.
      The most important question is how Ruth’s identity as a return migrant is to be accepted in Bethlehem community. Here the role of Boaz is to be highlighted. At first sight, Boaz regards Ruth as Naomi's daughter-in-law. Playing the roles of Goel and a levirate marriage partner, Boaz helps Ruth to be recognized as a return migrant.
      The reason why the Davidic royal genealogy is shown in the book of Ruth is because the story of Ruth is an ideal narrative that functions as a foundational story for the Davidic dynasty. The story of Ruth and Naomi is a tradition of return migration, and the story of Boaz is to help returning migrants. Since the Davidic dynasty and national leaders have the character of returning migrants, the book of Ruth can contribute positively to our understanding of the house of David.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to argue that return migration is a key theme in the book of Ruth, while emphasizing the importance of return migration in a multi-cultural society. In particular, this study will refocus the character of Ruth as a return ...

      The purpose of this study is to argue that return migration is a key theme in the book of Ruth, while emphasizing the importance of return migration in a multi-cultural society. In particular, this study will refocus the character of Ruth as a return migrant, rather than a simple migrant. Finally, the Davidic royal genealogy(Ruth 4:18-22) will be reinterpreted in terms of this return migration.
      When analyzing the structure of the book of Ruth, it can be found that the story of Naomi, rather than the story of Ruth, occupies the core and the return migration story of Naomi forms the center of the structure. Although Ruth's identity as a foreign woman is combined with her identity as Naomi's daughter-in-law, it is clear that Ruth returns with Naomi.
      The most important question is how Ruth’s identity as a return migrant is to be accepted in Bethlehem community. Here the role of Boaz is to be highlighted. At first sight, Boaz regards Ruth as Naomi's daughter-in-law. Playing the roles of Goel and a levirate marriage partner, Boaz helps Ruth to be recognized as a return migrant.
      The reason why the Davidic royal genealogy is shown in the book of Ruth is because the story of Ruth is an ideal narrative that functions as a foundational story for the Davidic dynasty. The story of Ruth and Naomi is a tradition of return migration, and the story of Boaz is to help returning migrants. Since the Davidic dynasty and national leaders have the character of returning migrants, the book of Ruth can contribute positively to our understanding of the house of David.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      이 논문은 다문화 사회에서 귀환이주가 중요함을 주목하면서, 구체적으로 룻기에서 귀환이주 전승이 핵심적인 주제임을 밝히고자 한다. 필자는 특히 룻을 이주자가 아니라 귀환이주자의 시각으로 재조명하며, 다윗 왕실 족보(룻 4:18-22) 문제도 귀환이주를 중심으로 재조명한다.
      번역하기

      이 논문은 다문화 사회에서 귀환이주가 중요함을 주목하면서, 구체적으로 룻기에서 귀환이주 전승이 핵심적인 주제임을 밝히고자 한다. 필자는 특히 룻을 이주자가 아니라 귀환이주자의 시...

      이 논문은 다문화 사회에서 귀환이주가 중요함을 주목하면서, 구체적으로 룻기에서 귀환이주 전승이 핵심적인 주제임을 밝히고자 한다. 필자는 특히 룻을 이주자가 아니라 귀환이주자의 시각으로 재조명하며, 다윗 왕실 족보(룻 4:18-22) 문제도 귀환이주를 중심으로 재조명한다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Sakenfeld, K. D, "현대성서주석-룻기" 한국장로교출판사 2001

      2 이태훈, "구약의 외국인 복지" 한국구약학회 14 (14): 70-88, 2008

      3 정중호, "‘귀환 이주’가 구약에서 강조된 이유" 한국구약학회 17 (17): 134-154, 2011

      4 Glover, Neil, "Your people, my people: an exploration of ethnicity in Ruth" 33 : 293-313, 2009

      5 Coxen, W, "Was Naomi a Scold? A Response to Fewell and Gunn" 45 : 25-37, 1989

      6 Prinsloo, W. S, "The theology of the Book of Ruth" 30 : 330-341, 1980

      7 Levenson, Alan T, "The mantle of the matriarchs: Ruth 4:11-15" 38 : 237-243, 2010

      8 Ketchum, Josh, "The go’el custom in Ruth a comparative study" 52 : 237-245, 2010

      9 Matthews, Victor H, "The determination of social identity in the story of Ruth" 36 : 49-54, 2006

      10 Glanzmann, G, "The Origin and Date of the Book of Ruth" 21 : 201-207, 1959

      1 Sakenfeld, K. D, "현대성서주석-룻기" 한국장로교출판사 2001

      2 이태훈, "구약의 외국인 복지" 한국구약학회 14 (14): 70-88, 2008

      3 정중호, "‘귀환 이주’가 구약에서 강조된 이유" 한국구약학회 17 (17): 134-154, 2011

      4 Glover, Neil, "Your people, my people: an exploration of ethnicity in Ruth" 33 : 293-313, 2009

      5 Coxen, W, "Was Naomi a Scold? A Response to Fewell and Gunn" 45 : 25-37, 1989

      6 Prinsloo, W. S, "The theology of the Book of Ruth" 30 : 330-341, 1980

      7 Levenson, Alan T, "The mantle of the matriarchs: Ruth 4:11-15" 38 : 237-243, 2010

      8 Ketchum, Josh, "The go’el custom in Ruth a comparative study" 52 : 237-245, 2010

      9 Matthews, Victor H, "The determination of social identity in the story of Ruth" 36 : 49-54, 2006

      10 Glanzmann, G, "The Origin and Date of the Book of Ruth" 21 : 201-207, 1959

      11 Conway, Dennis, "The Experience of Return Migration: Caribbean Perspectives" Ashgate 2005

      12 Willis, Timothey, "The Elders of the City: A Study of the Elders-Laws inDeuteronomy" SBL 2001

      13 Braulik, Georg, "The Book of Ruth as Intra-Biblical Critique on the Deuteronomic Law" 19 : 1-20, 1999

      14 Nielsen, Kirsten, "Ruth: A Commentary" Westminster John Knox Press 1997

      15 Chu, Julie L. C, "Returning home: the inspiration of the role dedifferentiation in the Book of Ruth for Taiwanese women" 78 : 47-53, 1997

      16 Hyman, Ronald R, "Questions and Changing Identity in the Book of Ruth" 39 : 189-201, 1984

      17 Berlin, Adele, "Poetics and Interpretation of Biblical Narrative" Eisenbrauns 1994

      18 Brenner, Athalya, "Naomi and Ruth" 33 : 385-397, 1983

      19 Trible, Phyllis, "God and the Rhetoric of Sexualit" Fortress 1978

      20 Siquans, Agenthe, "Foreignness and Poverty in the Book of Ruth: A Legal Way for a Poor Foreign Woman to Be Integrated into Israel" 128 : 443-452, 2009

      21 Gidwani, Vinay, "Circular Migration and Rural Cosmopolitanism in India" 37 : 339-367, 2004

      22 Ramirez Kidd, "Alterity and Identity in Israel: The rg in the Old Testament" De Gruyter 1999

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-04-20 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Old Testament Society -> Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies KCI등재
      2017-03-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Old Testament Society -> Korean Society of Old Testament Studies KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.62 0.58 0.788 0.24
      더보기

      연관 공개강의(KOCW)

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼