다문화시대 한국인의 심리적 적응: 집단정체성, 문화적응 이데올로기와 접촉이 이주민에 대한 편견에 미치는 영향 = Psychological Adaptation of Koreans in the Multicultural Era: The Effects of Social Identity, Acculturation-related Ideologies, and Intergroup Contact on Prejudice Against Migrants in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This survey research investigated whether Koreans’ attitudes toward migrants were affected by group identity, acculturation-related ideologies, threat, and intergroup contact. More specifically, we compared Koreans’ attitudes toward five different migrant groups (i.e., migrant workers, marriage migrant women, children of multicultural family, North Korean defectors and ethnic Koreans in China) to those toward Koreans (i.e., ingroup). We also explored whether prejudice toward migrants was affected by the in-group identification as Koreans, multiculturalism or assimilation ideologies, and the degree of contact with the migrants. To explore these issues, we conducted a nation-wide survey using the stratified sampling method, in which 1,000 Korean adults and 800 adolescents participated and responded to the questionnaire items asking about their attitudes (i.e., feeling thermometer, social distance, ideology, identification) through individual interviews. As expected, the results demonstrated that Koreans exhibited strong in-group favoritism: they evaluated their in-group more favorably than the migrant groups on the feeling thermometer scale, and the in-group favoritism of adolescents was stronger than that of adults. The results also demonstrated that in line with the social identity theory, high in-group identifiers showed more negative attitudes toward migrant groups than low in-group identifiers, especially when the participants perceived high identity (i.e., symbolic) threat. The hierarchical regression analyses on the social distance measures (i.e., ingroup-outgroup) demonstrated that the more Koreans endorsed assimilation ideology, the more the number of out-group acquaintances and the more they perceived realistic threats, the more negative their attitudes toward migrants became. On the other hand, endorsing multiculturalism ideology and contacting the migrants more frequently was associated with more positive out-group attitudes. Finally, intergroup anxiety as well as identity threat or realistic threat, respectively partially mediated the effects of contact frequency(or the endorsement of assimilation ideology or value of authoritarianism) on attitudes toward migrants. We discussed the theoretical and practical implications of these results.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 조사 연구에서는 한국인들이 이주민 집단들(즉, 이주노동자, 결혼이주여성, 다문화가정자녀, 새터민 및 조선족)에 대해 가지는 태도가 내집단에 대한 태도와 비교해 얼마나 부정적이며, 또한 이러한 태도가 집단정체성, 문화적응 관련 신념 및 집단간 접촉 정도에 의해 어떻게 영향 받는지를 검토하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 전국적 조사 연구를 실시하여 한국인 1800명(성인 1000명, 중고등학생 800명)을 다단계층화 표집방법을 통해 표집하고 개별 인터뷰 방법으로 응답하도록 하였다. 그 결과, 예상대로 한국인들은 강한 내집단 편애 혹은 상대적 외집단 비하 태도를 나타냈는데, 대상 집단에 따라 다른 태도가 나타났으며 특히 청소년들의 이주민에 대한 태도가 성인에 비해 더욱 부정적이었다. 위계적 회귀분석 결과, 사회정체 이론이 제안하는 대로 한국인으로서의 정체성이 높을수록 이주민에 대한 편견적 태도가 더 높았는데, 이러한 효과는 정체성위협이 높아질수록 더 강해졌다. 또한 접촉 수와 달리 접촉 빈도만이 편견감소를 예측하는 효과를 나타내었다. 또한 접촉과 신념간의 상호작용이 편견적 태도를 예측하였다. 마지막으로 접촉 빈도와 동화주의 신념이 편견에 미치는 영향 과정은 각각 집단간 불안이나 위협감(이득, 정체성)에 의해 매개된다는 결과가 나타났다. 이러한 결과의 이론적 의미와 현실적 의미에 대해서 논의하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 양계민, "현실갈등인식과 지각된 경제수준이 이주노동자에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향: 주관적안녕감의 상호작용효과를 중심으로" 한국사회및성격심리학회 24 (24): 111-128, 2010

2 김혜숙, "한국집단자아존중척도" 8 (8): 103-116, 1994

3 황정미, "한국사회의 다민족ㆍ다문화 지향성에 대한 조사연구" 한국여성개발원 2007

4 노경란, "한국대학생과 국내체류 외국대학생 간에 인종에 대한 명시적 및 암묵적 태도의 차이" 한국사회및성격심리학회 22 (22): 75-92, 2008

5 박수미, "차별에 대한 국민의식 및 수용성 연구" 한국여성개발원 2004

6 김지경, "차별경험, 정의로운 세상에 대한 믿음과 개인자부심, 집단자부심간의 관계에 대한 연구" 한국여성심리학회 7 (7): 1-13, 2002

7 안미영, "집단의 지위, 정당성 및안정성의 구조적 측면에 대한 지각이 차별 경험에미치는 영향：성별 집단과 지역 집단의 경우" 한국사회및성격심리학회 18 (18): 107-135, 2004

8 김혜숙, "우리나라 사람들이 가지는 가치가 소수 집단에 대한 편견적 태도에 미치는 영향" 한국사회및성격심리학회 21 (21): 91-104, 2007

9 매일경제신문, "외국인의 한국생활 애로사항"

10 설동훈, "외국인 노동자와 한국 사회" 서울대학교출판부 1998

11 박군석, "영호남인의 사회구조 요인 지각과 사회정체성이 상대박탈과 집합전략에 미치는 영향" 한국사회및성격심리학회 17 (17): 59-72, 2003

12 양애경, "여성결혼이민자에 대한 지역사회의 수용성 연구" 2007

13 김이선, "여성 결혼이민자의 문화적 갈등 경험과 소통 증진을 위한 정책과제" 한국여성개발원 2006

14 오계택, "아주노동자에 대한 한국인의 인식: 일터를 중심으로" 한국여성정책연구원 2007

15 조정아, "새터민의 문화갈등과 문화적 통합방안" 한국여성개발원 2006

16 전우영, "북한에 대한 고정관념과 통일에대한 거리감" 14 (14): 167-184, 2000

17 김혜숙, "북한사람에 대한 대학생과 일반인의 고정관념,감정과 태도:외국인에 대한 태도와의 비교" 8 (8): 1-22, 1999

18 정진경, "문화적응이론의 전개와 현황" 한국심리학회 23 (23): 101-136, 2004

19 김혜숙, "대학생들이 중요시하는 가치와 북한 사람 및 대북 정책에 대한 태도와의 관계에 관한 조사 연구" 한국사회및성격심리학회 16 (16): 35-50, 2002

20 김혜숙, "다수 집단과 소수 집단에 대한 고정관념의 내용: 유능성과 따뜻함의 차원에서의 분석" 한국사회및성격심리학회 17 (17): 121-143, 2003

21 김이선, "다민족․다문화사회로의이행을 위한 정책 패러다임 구축(Ⅰ): 한국사회의수용현실과 정책과제" 한국여성정책연구원 2007

22 황지현, "다문화주의 및 동화주의 이데올로기를 지지하는 설득 메시지가 동남아시아 이주민에 대한 명시적 · 암묵적 태도에 미치는 영향" 2009

23 노경란, "다문화시대 한국 초등학생의 인종에 대한 명시적 및 암묵적 태도발달과 태도변화" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 15 (15): 49-79, 2009

24 송미경, "다문화가정 외국인 모의 부모경험에 관한 연구" 한국상담심리학회 20 (20): 497-517, 2008

25 오은순, "다문화 교육을위한 범교과 교수·학습 프로그램 개발 연구" 한국여성정책연구원과 한국교육과정평가원 2008

26 김금미, "남성의 성별관계 인식과 성별사회정체성이 양성평등 행동의도에 미치는 영향" 한국사회및성격심리학회 17 (17): 31-47, 2003

27 설동훈, "국제노동력 이동과 한국내 외국인 노동자" 37 : 231-325, 1992

28 홍달아기, "국제결혼부부의 가치관 및 의사소통유형과 갈등과의 관계" 한국생활과학회 16 (16): 56-68, 2007

29 박주희, "국제결혼 이주여성의 문화적응과 정체성" 한국여성심리학회 12 (12): 395-432, 2007

30 양계민, "국내 소수집단에 대한 청소년들의 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국사회및성격심리학회 23 (23): 59-79, 2009

31 통계청, "가계동향자료"

32 Schwartz,S.H, "Universals in the contentand structure of values: Theoretical advancesand empirical tests in 20 countries" 25 : 1-65, 1992

33 Baron, R.M., "Themoderator-mediator variable distinction in socialpsychological research: Conceptual, strategic, andstatistical considerations" 51 : 1173-1182, 1986

34 Gaertner, S. L., "Theaversive form of racism, In Prejudice,discrimination, and racism" San Press 61-89, 1986

35 Spears, R., "The(il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: from social realityto social resistance, In The psychology of legitimacy: Emergingperspectives on ideology, justice, and intergrouprelations" Cambridge University Press 332-362, 2001

36 Tajfel, H., "The socialidentity theory of intergroup behavior, In Psychology ofintergroup relations" Nelson-Hall 7-24, 1986

37 Jost, J. T., "The role ofstereo- typing in system-justification and theproduction of false consciousness" 33 : 1-27, 1994

38 Taylor, D. M., "The personal/groupdiscrimination discrepancy： Perceiving mygroup, but not myself, to be a target fordiscrimination" 16 : 254-262, 1990

39 Allport,G.W, "The nature of Prejudice" Addison-Wesley 1954

40 Ellemers, N., "The influence of permeability of groupboundaries and stability of group status onstrategies of individual mobility and socialchange" 29 : 233-246, 1990

41 Wright, S. C, "The extended contact effect:Knowledge of cross-group friendship andprejudice" 73 : 73-90, 1997

42 Hwang, J .H, "The effect of a persuasive message endorsing themulticulturalism or assimilationism ideologies onexplicit and implicit attitude toward the Southeast Asian immigrants in Korea" Asian Association of Social Psychology 2009

43 Crocker, J., "The costly pursuitof self esteem" 130 : 392-414, 2004

44 Brewer,M.B, "Superordinate goals versussuperordinate identity as bases of intergroupcooperation, In Social identity processes: Trends in theory andresearch" Sage 117-132, 2000

45 Dovidio. J. F., "Stereotyping, Prejudice,and discrimination: Another look, In stereotypesand stereotyping" Guilford 276-319, 1996

46 Oakes, P. J., "Stereotyping and social reality" Basil Blackwell 1994

47 Ellemers, N., "Status protection in high statusminority groups" 22 : 123-140, 1992

48 Hogg, M. A., "Socialidentifications" Routledge, Chapman& Hall 1988

49 Turner, J. C., "Social status,cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations, In Differentiation between socialgroups： Studies in the social psychology ofintergroup relations" Academic Press 235-250, 1978

50 Tajfel,H, "Social psychology of intergrouprelations" 33 : 1-39, 1982

51 Guimond, S., "Social comparison,self-stereotyping and gender differences inself-construals" 90 : 221-242, 2006

52 Rothbart,M, "Social categorizationand behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis ofthe effects of intergroup contact" 41 (41): 81-104, 1985

53 Aron, A., "Self and self-expansionin relationships" Academic Press 1996

54 Turner, J. C., "Self and collective:Cognition and social" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1989

55 Schwartzwald, S., "Schooldesegregation: Cross-cultural perspectives" Academic Press New York

56 Wright, S. C., "Responding to Membership in aDisadvantaged Group: From Acceptance toCollective Protest" 58 (58): 994-1003, 1990

57 Maio, G. R., "Relationsbetween values, attitudes and behavioralintentions: The moderating role of attitudefunction" 31 : 266-285, 1995

58 Gaertner, S. L., "Reducing intergroup bias: Thebenefits of recategorization" 57 : 239-249, 1989

59 Katz, I., "Racial ambivalenceand value conflict： Correlational and primingstudies of dual cognitive structures" 55 : 893-905, 1988

60 Jussim, L., "Prejudice, stereotypes, and labellingeffects: Sources of bias in person perception" 68 : 228-246, 1995

61 Stephan, W. G., "On therelationship between stereotypes and prejudice:An international study" 20 : 277-284, 1994

62 Berry,J.W, "Mutual attitudes amongimmigrants and ethnocultural group in Canada" 20 : 719-734, 2006

63 Crisp, R., "Multiple SocialCategorization" 39 : 163-254, 2007

64 Leary,M.R, "Motivational and EmotionalAspects of the self" 58 : 317-344, 2007

65 Haddock, G., "Mood and the expression of intergroup attitudes:The moderating role of affect intensity" 24 : 189-205, 1994

66 Fredrickson,G.M, "Models of American ethnic relations: A historical perspective, In Culturaldivides: Understanding and overcoming groupconflict" Russell Sage Foundation 23-34, 1999

67 Bogardus,E.S, "Measuring social distances" 9 : 299-308, 1925

68 Mackie, D. M., "Intergroup emotions： Explaining offensive actiontendencies in an intergroup context" 79 : 602-616, 2000

69 Sherif. M., "Intergroup conflict and cooperation:The Robbers Cave experiment" Classics in the History of Psychology 1961

70 Gaertner, S. L., "How doescooperation reduce intergroup bias?" 59 : 692-704, 1990

71 Verkuyten,M, "Ethnic group identification andgroup evaluation among minority and majoritygroups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis" 88 : 121-138, 2005

72 Amir, Y, "Enhancing intergrouprelations in Israel: a differential approach.Stereotyping and Prejudice: ChangingConceptions" Springer 243-257, 1989

73 Ellemers, N., "Effects of the legitimacy of low group orindividual status on individual and collectivestatus-enhancement strategies" 64 : 766-778, 1993

74 Gonzalez,　R., "Dual identities inintergroup contact: Group status and sizemoderate the generalization of positive attitudechange" 42 : 753-767, 2006

75 Binder, J., "Does contact reduceprejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? Alongitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongmajority and minority groups in three europeancountries" 96 : 843-856, 2009

76 Pettigrew, T. F., "Direct and indirectintergroup contact effects on prejudice: Anormative interpretation" 31 : 411-425, 2007

77 Troopp, L. R., "DifferentialRelationships Between Intergroup Contact andAffective and Cognitive Dimensions of Prejudice" 31 (31): 1145-1158, 2005

78 Markus, H., "Culture and theself: Implications for cognition, emotion, andmotivation" 98 : 224-253, 1991

79 Berry,J.W, "Cultural relations in pluralsocieties: Alternatives to segregation and theirsociopsychological implications, In Groups in contact" Academic Press. 1984

80 Taush, N., "Cross-Community Contact,Perceived Status Differences, and IntergroupAttitudes in Northern Ireland: The MediatingRoles of Individual-level versus Group-levelThreats and the Moderating Role of SocialIdentification" 28 : 53-68, 2007

81 Cook.S.W, "Cooperative interaction inmulti-ethnic contexts, In Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation" Academic Press 156-186, 1984

82 Hewstone, M., "Contact is notenough: An intergroup perspective on the contacthypothesis, In Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters" Blackwell 3-44, 1986

83 Hewstone,M, "Contact and categorization:Social psychological interventions to changeintergroup relations, In Foundations of stereotypesand stereotyping" Guilford Press 323-368, 1996

84 Berry,J.W, "Conceptual approaches toacculturation, In Acculturation. Advances intheory, measurement, and applied research" American PsychologicalAssociation 2003

85 Dovidio, J. F, "CommonIngroup Identity: A categorization-basedapproach for reducing intergroup bias, In Handbook of prejudice" Taylor & Francis 489-506, 2010

86 Crocker, J., "Collectiveself-esteem and ingroup bias" 58 : 60-67, 1990

87 Brewer, M. B., "Beyond thecontact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives ondesegregation, In Groups in contact: The psychology ofdesegregation" Academic Press 281-302, 1984

88 Verkuyten,M, "Assimilation ideology andsituational well-being among ethnic minoritymembers" 46 : 269-275, 2010

89 Hornsey, M., "Assimilation andDiversity: An Integrative Model of SubgroupRelations" 4 (4): 143-156, 2000

90 Haddock,. G., "Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes:The case of attitudes toward homosexuals" 65 : 1105-1118, 1993

91 Dovidio, J. F., "Another view of "we": Majority and minoritygroup perspectives on a common ingroupidentity" 18 : 296-330, 2007

92 Brown, R., "An integrativetheory of intergroup contact, In Advances in Experimental SocialPsychology Vol.37" Academic Press 255-343, 2005

93 Tajfel, H., "An integrativetheory of intergroup conflict, In The social psychology ofintergroup relations" Brooks/Cole 33-48, 1979

94 Pettigrew, T. F., "Ameta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory" 90 : 751-783, 2006

95 Stangor, C., "Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice" 9 : 59-80, 1991

96 Turner, R. N., "A test of the extended intergroupcontact hypothesis: the mediating role ofintergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup andoutgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup inthe self" 95 (95): 843-860, 2008

97 Fiske, S. T., "A model of (often mixed) stereotype content:Competence and warmth respectively follow fromperceived status and competition" 82 : 878-902, 2002

98 Berry,J.W, "A Psychology of immigration" 57 : 615-631, 2001