RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      蘇聯의 對아시아 進出과 韓半島 = The Russian Advance into Asia and the North-South Korean Relationship

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19582316

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Korean peninsula commands the Far East. All the great Asian powers and also the United States and the Soviet Union have considered the Korean peninsula as the part of their defense lines. The Korean peninsula was divided into North and South Koreas at the end of the World War Ⅱ as a result of the geopolitical considerations of the major powers. After the end of World War Ⅱ, the United States and the Soviet Union, the global superpowers, had competitively occupied the Korean peninsula and even fought a war in Korea. Today, too, Korea is the focus of interests of the four major powers, the United States, the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, and Japan. The interests of the four major powers inextricably intersect in the Korean peninsula where they come intimately into play. Thus, Korea has become one of the world's most acute trouble spots.
      The purpose of this study is to examine how the Soviet foreign policy has been changing and how it affects the politics of inter-Korean relationship. This study has generally focused on international and situational factors as the independent variables and the fate of Korea as the dependent variables. In short, this is the study on the relationship between changes in the Soviet foreign policy and their implications to the two Koreas' policy changes against each other.
      Foreign policy decision-making processes are very complex. Factors which affect the process are many and actors involved in it usually have different backgrounds, interests, and goals. One is military-security aspect, the other is an economic one. The Soviet military policy in the Asia-Pacific region has largely been influenced by the great power syndrome which sought a maximum security by a military means. Even though the Soviet followed the road of perestroika, they cannot yield the geopolitical interest of the Korean peninsula as a gateway to the Pacific. While easying tensions with South Korea, the Soviet Union will continue to seek the military advantage in the area, for the peninsula holds the cap-stone of the Soviet Military power over the entire Asian-Pacific region.
      South Korea's economic potentials attracted Soviet economic interests. South Korea can provide the necessary goods and mid-level technology to produce consummer goods. South Korea perceives the Soviet Union as a new market of resources as well as of commodities. With those understandings of mutual interests between Moscow and Seoul, the establishment of a diplomatic relationship between South Korea and the Soviet Union was a natural step to follow.
      In order to improve the established relationship between the two countries, there seems to be a number of conditions to be met. First, the two sides must reach a common understanding on the importance of the reunification of the Korean peninsula. Second, there should be an official apology made by the Soviet Union on the fate of the Korean Air 007 as well as the Korean War which the Soviet Union supported. Third, economic cooperation should be based on a long-term plan and it must be mutually beneficial in terms of complimentarity.
      This study is limited to creating a better understanding of the fundamental characteristics of the alliance between the Soviet Union and North Korea in reference to the opening of diplomatic relationship between South Korea and the Soviet Union. It also aims to be a comprehensive view of the political, military and economic aspects of present-day South Korea.
      번역하기

      The Korean peninsula commands the Far East. All the great Asian powers and also the United States and the Soviet Union have considered the Korean peninsula as the part of their defense lines. The Korean peninsula was divided into North and South Korea...

      The Korean peninsula commands the Far East. All the great Asian powers and also the United States and the Soviet Union have considered the Korean peninsula as the part of their defense lines. The Korean peninsula was divided into North and South Koreas at the end of the World War Ⅱ as a result of the geopolitical considerations of the major powers. After the end of World War Ⅱ, the United States and the Soviet Union, the global superpowers, had competitively occupied the Korean peninsula and even fought a war in Korea. Today, too, Korea is the focus of interests of the four major powers, the United States, the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, and Japan. The interests of the four major powers inextricably intersect in the Korean peninsula where they come intimately into play. Thus, Korea has become one of the world's most acute trouble spots.
      The purpose of this study is to examine how the Soviet foreign policy has been changing and how it affects the politics of inter-Korean relationship. This study has generally focused on international and situational factors as the independent variables and the fate of Korea as the dependent variables. In short, this is the study on the relationship between changes in the Soviet foreign policy and their implications to the two Koreas' policy changes against each other.
      Foreign policy decision-making processes are very complex. Factors which affect the process are many and actors involved in it usually have different backgrounds, interests, and goals. One is military-security aspect, the other is an economic one. The Soviet military policy in the Asia-Pacific region has largely been influenced by the great power syndrome which sought a maximum security by a military means. Even though the Soviet followed the road of perestroika, they cannot yield the geopolitical interest of the Korean peninsula as a gateway to the Pacific. While easying tensions with South Korea, the Soviet Union will continue to seek the military advantage in the area, for the peninsula holds the cap-stone of the Soviet Military power over the entire Asian-Pacific region.
      South Korea's economic potentials attracted Soviet economic interests. South Korea can provide the necessary goods and mid-level technology to produce consummer goods. South Korea perceives the Soviet Union as a new market of resources as well as of commodities. With those understandings of mutual interests between Moscow and Seoul, the establishment of a diplomatic relationship between South Korea and the Soviet Union was a natural step to follow.
      In order to improve the established relationship between the two countries, there seems to be a number of conditions to be met. First, the two sides must reach a common understanding on the importance of the reunification of the Korean peninsula. Second, there should be an official apology made by the Soviet Union on the fate of the Korean Air 007 as well as the Korean War which the Soviet Union supported. Third, economic cooperation should be based on a long-term plan and it must be mutually beneficial in terms of complimentarity.
      This study is limited to creating a better understanding of the fundamental characteristics of the alliance between the Soviet Union and North Korea in reference to the opening of diplomatic relationship between South Korea and the Soviet Union. It also aims to be a comprehensive view of the political, military and economic aspects of present-day South Korea.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 蘇聯의 對아시아政策
      • 1. 蘇聯外交政策의 基本目標
      • 2. 對아시아政策變化의 內容
      • 3. 對아시아政策變更要因
      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 蘇聯의 對아시아政策
      • 1. 蘇聯外交政策의 基本目標
      • 2. 對아시아政策變化의 內容
      • 3. 對아시아政策變更要因
      • Ⅲ. 蘇聯의 對韓半島政策
      • 1. 蘇聯의 對韓半島 基本觀心
      • 2. 80년대 고르바초프의 對韓半島政策 推移
      • 3. 對韓半島 政策變化의 背景
      • Ⅳ. 韓蘇修交의 意味와 波長
      • 1. 韓半島 周邊情勢
      • 2. 南北韓 關係
      • 3. 韓蘇經濟關係
      • 4. 韓蘇 모스크바 頂上會談
      • Ⅴ. 結論
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼