RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      장애인가구와 비장애인가구의 주거복지수준 비교 = 최저주거기준과 주거비부담능력을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99704026

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study analyzed minimum standards of housing and housing affordability to compare levels of housing welfare between households with disabled members and without disabled members. The proportion of the households with disabled members which did not meet the minimum standards of housing was 47.3%, while the proportion of the households without disabled members was 42.8%. Concerning housing affordability, the proportion of the households with disabled members which spent more than the appropriate housing cost-to-income ratio(30%) was 15.2%, while the proportion of the households without disabled members was 11.1%. In addition, appropriate minimum housing cost-to-income ratios were estimated to consider housing attributes of households by using the hedonic price model. The proportion of the households with disabled members of which the estimated minimum housing cost-to-income ratio was over 30%, was 35.7%. It was 13.0% point higher than that of the households without disabled members, 22.8%. The estimated minimum housing cost-to-income ratios by the hedonic theory were much higher than the real housing cost-to-income ratios. Moreover, the difference between the households with disabled members and without disabled members was bigger with the hedonic theory. It means the housing cost burden of the households with disabled members will become bigger than that of the households without disabled members when the households try to reside in houses which meet each household’s housing attributes and the minimum standards of housing. In conclusion, the levels of housing welfare of the households with disabled members were lower than those of the households without disabled members.
      번역하기

      This study analyzed minimum standards of housing and housing affordability to compare levels of housing welfare between households with disabled members and without disabled members. The proportion of the households with disabled members which did not...

      This study analyzed minimum standards of housing and housing affordability to compare levels of housing welfare between households with disabled members and without disabled members. The proportion of the households with disabled members which did not meet the minimum standards of housing was 47.3%, while the proportion of the households without disabled members was 42.8%. Concerning housing affordability, the proportion of the households with disabled members which spent more than the appropriate housing cost-to-income ratio(30%) was 15.2%, while the proportion of the households without disabled members was 11.1%. In addition, appropriate minimum housing cost-to-income ratios were estimated to consider housing attributes of households by using the hedonic price model. The proportion of the households with disabled members of which the estimated minimum housing cost-to-income ratio was over 30%, was 35.7%. It was 13.0% point higher than that of the households without disabled members, 22.8%. The estimated minimum housing cost-to-income ratios by the hedonic theory were much higher than the real housing cost-to-income ratios. Moreover, the difference between the households with disabled members and without disabled members was bigger with the hedonic theory. It means the housing cost burden of the households with disabled members will become bigger than that of the households without disabled members when the households try to reside in houses which meet each household’s housing attributes and the minimum standards of housing. In conclusion, the levels of housing welfare of the households with disabled members were lower than those of the households without disabled members.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼