RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정보화 성과의 사전-사후평가 차이에 관한 사례연구 = A Case Study of the Discrepancy between Ex Ante and Ex Post Evaluation of IS Performance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60193360

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this longitudinal case study is to shed light on the reliability problems of IS performance evaluation by analyzing the discrepancy between ex ante evaluation in 2011 and ex post evaluation in 2012. Through an information system development project of a public enterprise, the gap between ex ante and ex post evaluation was ascertained and the causes as to why such gap occurs and the success factors that can solve the problems were derived. The ex ante evaluation of IS performance was performed based on both IS success model and BSC model and the ex post evaluation was carried out at the time after the target system has been built up by applying the evaluation measures and process that are similar to the ex ante evaluation. In the ex ante evaluation the business performance improved by the target system was estimated to 18.2%. On the other hand, it was seen as being low at 15.2% in the ex post evaluation and the differences were found to be statistically significant in 6 out of 10 measures. The reasons as to why such gap occurs were diagnosed as being of 2 types : (1) changes in the evaluation psychology according to the differences in the evaluation objectives; and (2) excessive expectation levels of the target system that is formed at the time of the ex ante evaluation. In other words, the users who have excessive expectations tend to overestimate in the ex ante evaluation and, in the ex post evaluation, tend to underestimate lower than the actual performance mainly due to disappointment on the results that do not meet the early expectations. As solutions to overcome the reliability problem of ex ante evaluation, 3 factors were derived : (1) the temperance of excessive expectation levels of the users; (2) a clear definition of the scope and functionality of the target system; and (3) actual commitments for the evaluations of IT performance.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this longitudinal case study is to shed light on the reliability problems of IS performance evaluation by analyzing the discrepancy between ex ante evaluation in 2011 and ex post evaluation in 2012. Through an information system develop...

    The purpose of this longitudinal case study is to shed light on the reliability problems of IS performance evaluation by analyzing the discrepancy between ex ante evaluation in 2011 and ex post evaluation in 2012. Through an information system development project of a public enterprise, the gap between ex ante and ex post evaluation was ascertained and the causes as to why such gap occurs and the success factors that can solve the problems were derived. The ex ante evaluation of IS performance was performed based on both IS success model and BSC model and the ex post evaluation was carried out at the time after the target system has been built up by applying the evaluation measures and process that are similar to the ex ante evaluation. In the ex ante evaluation the business performance improved by the target system was estimated to 18.2%. On the other hand, it was seen as being low at 15.2% in the ex post evaluation and the differences were found to be statistically significant in 6 out of 10 measures. The reasons as to why such gap occurs were diagnosed as being of 2 types : (1) changes in the evaluation psychology according to the differences in the evaluation objectives; and (2) excessive expectation levels of the target system that is formed at the time of the ex ante evaluation. In other words, the users who have excessive expectations tend to overestimate in the ex ante evaluation and, in the ex post evaluation, tend to underestimate lower than the actual performance mainly due to disappointment on the results that do not meet the early expectations. As solutions to overcome the reliability problem of ex ante evaluation, 3 factors were derived : (1) the temperance of excessive expectation levels of the users; (2) a clear definition of the scope and functionality of the target system; and (3) actual commitments for the evaluations of IT performance.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 배경
    • 3. 정보화 성과 사전-사후평가 사례
    • 4. 사전-사후평가 차이 발생원인 및해결방안
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 배경
    • 3. 정보화 성과 사전-사후평가 사례
    • 4. 사전-사후평가 차이 발생원인 및해결방안
    • 5. 결론 및 제언
    • 참고문헌
    • 저자소개
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한국정보화진흥원, "전자정부사업의 경제적성과 측정모델 개발 연구 용역보고서" 2010

    2 행정안전부, "알기 쉬운정보화 투자관리 가이드"

    3 손명호, "기업 전략에 따른 균형성과표 성과지표 비교분석" 한국경영정보학회 13 (13): 1-22, 2003

    4 Bhatt, F, "Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantages : An empirical study" 22 (22): 253-277, 2005

    5 Bacon, C. J, "The use of decision criteria in selecting information systems/technology investments" 16 (16): 335-353, 1992

    6 Erickson, J, "The total economic impacts of network appliance’s solution relating to business continuance" Giga Information Group 121-132, 2002

    7 Thatcher, M. E, "The impact of technology investment on a firm’s production efficiency, product quality, and productivity" 18 (18): 17-45, 2001

    8 Sharma, R., "The contingent effects of management support and task independence on successful information systems implementation" 27 (27): 533-555, 2003

    9 Kaplan, R. S., "The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance" 71-79, 1992

    10 Weill, P, "The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance : A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector" 3 (3): 307-333, 1992

    1 한국정보화진흥원, "전자정부사업의 경제적성과 측정모델 개발 연구 용역보고서" 2010

    2 행정안전부, "알기 쉬운정보화 투자관리 가이드"

    3 손명호, "기업 전략에 따른 균형성과표 성과지표 비교분석" 한국경영정보학회 13 (13): 1-22, 2003

    4 Bhatt, F, "Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantages : An empirical study" 22 (22): 253-277, 2005

    5 Bacon, C. J, "The use of decision criteria in selecting information systems/technology investments" 16 (16): 335-353, 1992

    6 Erickson, J, "The total economic impacts of network appliance’s solution relating to business continuance" Giga Information Group 121-132, 2002

    7 Thatcher, M. E, "The impact of technology investment on a firm’s production efficiency, product quality, and productivity" 18 (18): 17-45, 2001

    8 Sharma, R., "The contingent effects of management support and task independence on successful information systems implementation" 27 (27): 533-555, 2003

    9 Kaplan, R. S., "The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance" 71-79, 1992

    10 Weill, P, "The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance : A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector" 3 (3): 307-333, 1992

    11 DeLone, W., "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success : A ten-year upgrade" 19 (19): 9-30, 2003

    12 Grigoroudis, E, "Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organization : A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard" 40 : 104-119, 2010

    13 Boehm, B. W, "Software risk management : principle and practice" 32-41, 1992

    14 Primrose, P. L, "Selecting and evaluating cost-effective MRP and MPRII" 10 (10): 51-66, 1990

    15 Melville, N, "Review : Information technology and organizational performance : An integrative model of IT business value" 28 (28): 283-322, 2004

    16 Iman, A., "Project management practices : The criteria for success or failure" 1 (1): 234-241, 2008

    17 Hitt, L. M, "Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus : Three different measures of information technology value" 20 (20): 121-142, 1996

    18 Bardhan, I., "Prioritizing a portfolio of informationtechnology investment projects" 21 (21): 33-60, 2004

    19 Petter S, "Measuring information systems success :Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships" 17 (17): 236-263, 2008

    20 Devaraj, S., "Information technology payoff in the health-care industry : A longitudinal study" 16 (16): 41-68, 2000

    21 Serafeimidis, V., "Information systems evaluation in practice : A case study of organizational change" 15 (15): 93-105, 2000

    22 Irani, Z., "Information systems evaluation : Navigating through the problem domain" 40 (40): 11-24, 2002

    23 Irani, Z, "Information system evaluation : Past, present, and future" 10 (10): 183-188, 2001

    24 Parker, M. M, "Information Economics : Linking Business Performance to Information Technology" Prentice-Hall 1988

    25 Kohli, R., "Informating the clan : controlling physicians’ costs and outcomes" 28 (28): 363-394, 2004

    26 박소현, "IT 비즈니스 가치 평가관점:사전-사후 평가시점 및 정보시스템 유형별 차이" 한국데이타베이스학회 15 (15): 203-224, 2008

    27 Tallon, P. P., "Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology : A process-oriented Approach" 16 (16): 145-173, 2000

    28 Yin, Y. K., "Case Study Research : Design and Methods (3rd Edition)" Sage Publication 2003

    29 Smithson, S., "Analyzing information systems evaluation : Another look at an old problem" 7 (7): 158-174, 1998

    30 Barua, A, "An empirical investigation of netenabled business value" 28 (28): 585-620, 2004

    31 Bannister, F, "Acts of faith: Instinct, value and IT investment decisions" 15 : 231-241, 2000

    32 GAO, "A Framework for Assessing and Improving Process Maturity" GAO 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-04-01 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국데이타베이스학회 -> 한국데이터전략학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Data Strategy Society
    KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
    외국어명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.39 0.39 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.56 0.673 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼