RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    가치동맹에 의한 21세기 한미관계의 새로운 비전 = Comprehensive Value Alliance Between Korea and the U.S. for the 21th Century

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99588332

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Over the past ten years, heated debates have been made in Korea over the mode of relationship between South Korea and the United States. The so-called 'self-reliance diplomacy' and 'alliance diplomacy' have been at odds with each other over which side would better serve the nation's interests. The disparities between the two opposing views do not stem simply from different policy responses to the rapidly changing post-Cold War situation. Rather, they represent the divide in national politics and ideology, assessment of North Korea, and, more importantly, overall interpretation of the nature of U.S.-ROK relationship itself during the past 50 years. This paper contends that the traditional mode of alliance between Korea and the United States now should be reshuffled for a more productive and sustainable future. It suggests a 'comprehensive value alliance' that goes far beyond the military or economic realms of mutual cooperations. Comprehensive value alliance can provide, first of all, a structural stability and durability for the relationship between the two nations. It also envisions the two countries' relatively equal status and partnership. In addition, comprehensive value alliance can easily fit into the so-called 'network international politics' in the age of globalization. Furthermore, we can expect from the two countries's value alliance the rise of new universal values in the era of post-ideology civilization. Finally, value alliance approach is able to go hand in hand with the increasing importance of 'soft power' in international relations in the 21th century.
    번역하기

    Over the past ten years, heated debates have been made in Korea over the mode of relationship between South Korea and the United States. The so-called 'self-reliance diplomacy' and 'alliance diplomacy' have been at odds with each other over which side...

    Over the past ten years, heated debates have been made in Korea over the mode of relationship between South Korea and the United States. The so-called 'self-reliance diplomacy' and 'alliance diplomacy' have been at odds with each other over which side would better serve the nation's interests. The disparities between the two opposing views do not stem simply from different policy responses to the rapidly changing post-Cold War situation. Rather, they represent the divide in national politics and ideology, assessment of North Korea, and, more importantly, overall interpretation of the nature of U.S.-ROK relationship itself during the past 50 years. This paper contends that the traditional mode of alliance between Korea and the United States now should be reshuffled for a more productive and sustainable future. It suggests a 'comprehensive value alliance' that goes far beyond the military or economic realms of mutual cooperations. Comprehensive value alliance can provide, first of all, a structural stability and durability for the relationship between the two nations. It also envisions the two countries' relatively equal status and partnership. In addition, comprehensive value alliance can easily fit into the so-called 'network international politics' in the age of globalization. Furthermore, we can expect from the two countries's value alliance the rise of new universal values in the era of post-ideology civilization. Finally, value alliance approach is able to go hand in hand with the increasing importance of 'soft power' in international relations in the 21th century.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 문제제기
    • Ⅱ. 한국과 미국 : 가치의 충돌과 동조
    • Ⅲ. 한미 가치동맹의 의의와 구조
    • Ⅳ. 한미 가치동맹 강화 전략
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • Ⅰ. 문제제기
    • Ⅱ. 한국과 미국 : 가치의 충돌과 동조
    • Ⅲ. 한미 가치동맹의 의의와 구조
    • Ⅳ. 한미 가치동맹 강화 전략
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼