RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    이해관계자의 요구와 감가상각방법 선택의 관련성 = The Relation between Stakeholder’s Claims and Firm’s Depreciation Method Choices

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104296740

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Management’s key roles are coordinated with the various interests between the external and internal stakeholders to pursue firms’ growth and profitability and maximize the firm value. Firms often enter into explicit contracts with their stakeholder, but many ongoing relations remain implicit in practice. Implied commitments generally have no legal standing, a firm is able to negotiate with its stakeholders depend in part on the firm's reputation for fulfilling its implied commitments.
    Stakeholders that related to directly or indirectly the firm's profitability and growth are likely to use to such a firm's financial condition and reported accounting numbers to help assess the firm's reputation for fulfilling its implicit claims, and so will pay attention to that. Implicit claims of the stakeholders over the long term are a significant factor in the firm’s survival and development.
    Therefore, management's choice of income-increasing accounting methods predict positively associated with the extent to which the firm depends on implicit claims with these stakeholder groups and growth of assets. But such accounting-based choice did little to study.
    In this study, based on theory and anecdotal evidence, between a firm and its stakeholders;customers, suppliers, employees and short-term creditors create incentives for management to choose long-run income-increasing depreciation methods. This study Bowen et al.(1995) and, by extension, the depreciation method is chose stakeholders in the accounting their implicit claims and growth of assets is to analyze how the affecting. With respect to the implicit claims of the stakeholders selected proxies and the control variables are found to be significant in explaining cross-sectional variation in depreciation methods:firm size, debt ratio, return on assets, internal concentration of ownership, and how to choose the depreciation method with respect to the systematic empirical analysis was associated significantly.
    A common conclusion in this paper is that a firm is able to negotiate with four specific stakeholders groups;customers, suppliers, employees and short-term creditors depend on its reputation for fulfilling its implicit claims.
    This provides management with an incentive to choose income-increasing depreciation methods, and strength of this incentive varies with the extent to which the firm depends on implicit claims with its stakeholders, especially customers, suppliers and employees. And supposing that the assets increase or maintain at certain level, these firms usually choose a income -increasing depreciation method.
    번역하기

    Management’s key roles are coordinated with the various interests between the external and internal stakeholders to pursue firms’ growth and profitability and maximize the firm value. Firms often enter into explicit contracts with their stakeholde...

    Management’s key roles are coordinated with the various interests between the external and internal stakeholders to pursue firms’ growth and profitability and maximize the firm value. Firms often enter into explicit contracts with their stakeholder, but many ongoing relations remain implicit in practice. Implied commitments generally have no legal standing, a firm is able to negotiate with its stakeholders depend in part on the firm's reputation for fulfilling its implied commitments.
    Stakeholders that related to directly or indirectly the firm's profitability and growth are likely to use to such a firm's financial condition and reported accounting numbers to help assess the firm's reputation for fulfilling its implicit claims, and so will pay attention to that. Implicit claims of the stakeholders over the long term are a significant factor in the firm’s survival and development.
    Therefore, management's choice of income-increasing accounting methods predict positively associated with the extent to which the firm depends on implicit claims with these stakeholder groups and growth of assets. But such accounting-based choice did little to study.
    In this study, based on theory and anecdotal evidence, between a firm and its stakeholders;customers, suppliers, employees and short-term creditors create incentives for management to choose long-run income-increasing depreciation methods. This study Bowen et al.(1995) and, by extension, the depreciation method is chose stakeholders in the accounting their implicit claims and growth of assets is to analyze how the affecting. With respect to the implicit claims of the stakeholders selected proxies and the control variables are found to be significant in explaining cross-sectional variation in depreciation methods:firm size, debt ratio, return on assets, internal concentration of ownership, and how to choose the depreciation method with respect to the systematic empirical analysis was associated significantly.
    A common conclusion in this paper is that a firm is able to negotiate with four specific stakeholders groups;customers, suppliers, employees and short-term creditors depend on its reputation for fulfilling its implicit claims.
    This provides management with an incentive to choose income-increasing depreciation methods, and strength of this incentive varies with the extent to which the firm depends on implicit claims with its stakeholders, especially customers, suppliers and employees. And supposing that the assets increase or maintain at certain level, these firms usually choose a income -increasing depreciation method.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 고윤성, "기업특성에 따른 세무조정형태" 한국세무학회 9 (9): 63-94, 2008

    2 박항준, "기업의 재무특성요인과 회계선택요인에 관한 연구" 한국산업경제학회 18 (18): 525-552, 2005

    3 박윤종, "기업의 설비투자규모(자본재집약도)와 수익성(자본이익률)이 감가상각방법선택에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 5 (5): 79-105, 2004

    4 박윤종, "기업소유구조와 감가상각방법선택에 관한 실증연구" 4 (4): 219-263, 2003

    5 李仁淳, "경영자의 회계정책 선택동기에 관한 연구 : 감가상각방법과 재고자산 평가방법을 중심으로" 嶺南大學校 大學院 1994

    6 현진권, "감가상각의 현황과 정책방향" 한국조세연구원 94-06, 1994

    7 김상기, "감가상각방법과 상각기간이 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 11 (11): 45-66, 2010

    8 Garbett, T, "When to advertise your company" 100-106, 1982

    9 Watts, R., "Towards A Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards" 53 (53): 112-134, 1978

    10 Jensen, M. C., "Theory of the Firm, managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure" 3 (3): 305-360, 1976

    1 고윤성, "기업특성에 따른 세무조정형태" 한국세무학회 9 (9): 63-94, 2008

    2 박항준, "기업의 재무특성요인과 회계선택요인에 관한 연구" 한국산업경제학회 18 (18): 525-552, 2005

    3 박윤종, "기업의 설비투자규모(자본재집약도)와 수익성(자본이익률)이 감가상각방법선택에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 5 (5): 79-105, 2004

    4 박윤종, "기업소유구조와 감가상각방법선택에 관한 실증연구" 4 (4): 219-263, 2003

    5 李仁淳, "경영자의 회계정책 선택동기에 관한 연구 : 감가상각방법과 재고자산 평가방법을 중심으로" 嶺南大學校 大學院 1994

    6 현진권, "감가상각의 현황과 정책방향" 한국조세연구원 94-06, 1994

    7 김상기, "감가상각방법과 상각기간이 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 11 (11): 45-66, 2010

    8 Garbett, T, "When to advertise your company" 100-106, 1982

    9 Watts, R., "Towards A Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards" 53 (53): 112-134, 1978

    10 Jensen, M. C., "Theory of the Firm, managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure" 3 (3): 305-360, 1976

    11 Tesler, L, "Theory of self-enforcing agreements" 53 (53): 27-44, 1980

    12 Demsetz, H, "The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm" 26 : 375-390, 1983

    13 Demsetz, H, "The structure of corporate ownership:Causes and consequences" 93 (93): 1155-1177, 1985

    14 Klein, B., "The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance" 89 (89): 615-641, 1981

    15 Macneil, I, "The new social contract" Yale University Press 1980

    16 Skinner, Douglas J, "The investment opportunity set and accounting procedure choice" 16 (16): 407-445, 1993

    17 |ppolito, R, "The implicit pension contract:developments and new directions" 22 (22): 441-467, 1987

    18 Bull, C, "The existence of self-enforcing implicit contracts" 102 (102): 147-159, 1987

    19 Titman, S, "The effect of capital structure on a firm's liquidation decision" 13 (13): 137-151, 1984

    20 Titman, S., "The determinants of capital structure choice" 43 (43): 1-19, 1988

    21 Brickley, J., "The Takeover Market, Corporate Board Composition and Ownership Structure:The Case of Banking" 30 (30): 161-180, 1987

    22 Dhaliwal, Dan S, "The Effect of Owner versus Management control on the choice of accounting methods" 4 (4): 41-53, 1982

    23 Holthausen, Robert W, "The Economic Consequences of Accounting choice implications of Costly Contracting and Monitoring" 5 : 77-177, 1983

    24 Bowen, R. M, "Stakeholder’s implicit claims and accounting method choice" 20 (20): 255-295, 1995

    25 Hagerman, R. L, "Some Economic Determinants of Accounting Policy Choice" 1 (1): 141-161, 1979

    26 Hindley, B, "Separation of ownership and control in the modern corporation" 13 (13): 185-222, 1970

    27 Milgrom, P., "Price and advertising signals of product quality" 94 (94): 796-821, 1986

    28 Watts, R, "Positive accounting theory" Prentice Hall 1986

    29 Kirmani, A., "Money talks:Perceived advertising expense and expected product quality" 16 (16): 344-353, 1989

    30 Ippolito, R., "LBOs, reversions and implicit contracts" 47 (47): 139-167, 1992

    31 Maksimovic, V, "Financial policy and reputation for product quality" 4 (4): 175-206, 1991

    32 Christie, A., "Efficient and opportunistic choices of accounting procedures: Corporate control contests" 69 (69): 539-566, 1994

    33 Jackson, S, "Economic consequences of firms’ depreciation method choice:Evidence from capital investments" 48 (48): 54-68, 2009

    34 Pincus, M, "Earnings effects of alternative accounting methods and sufficiency of disclosures" University of Iowa 1994

    35 Dwyer, F., "Developing buyer-seller relationships" 51 (51): 11-27, 1987

    36 Bowen, R., "Determinants of the corporate decision to capitalize interest" 3 (3): 151-179, 1981

    37 Cornell, B., "Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance" 16 (16): 5-14, 1987

    38 Macneil, l., "Contracts:Adjustment of long term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law" 72 (72): 854-905, 1978

    39 Duke, J., "An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting related debt proxies" 12 (12): 45-63, 1990

    40 Nelson, P, "Advertising as information" 82 (82): 729-754, 1974

    41 John, T., "Accounting measures of corporate liquidity, leverage, and costs of financial distress" 22 (22): 91-100, 1993

    42 Maunders, K., "Accounting information, employees and collective bargaining" 1 (1): 109-127, 1974

    43 Press, E, "Accounting based constraints in public and private debt agreements: Their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice" 12 (12): 65-95, 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼