규장각의 『日省錄』 편찬과 正祖의 정통성 강화 = Compilation of Ilseongnok by Gyujanggak and Consolidation of King Jeongjo’s Legitimacy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As King Jeongjo overcame the obstacles of various political forces that denied his legitimacy, he had prepared the Jonhyeongak Diary from an early age as a means to consolidate his legitimacy as a king and create a justification to politically remove those who opposed him. Yeongjosillok and Yeongmyobogam also served to strengthen the legitimacy of King Jeongjo. However, the Yeongjosillok contained the specific circumstances of the Imohwabyeon, and the Yeongmyobogam did not contain the circumstances of the Imohwabyeon, but it was difficult to compare to the Yeongjosillok in terms of status and quantity as a chronicle of government. At this point, there was room for the following alternatives. In other words, it is the creation of a chronicle of government that excludes records related to the Imohwabyeon while having enough information to reproduce the era of the King Jeongjo’s era through daily records. This is how Ilseongnok was born.
When the organization and function of Gyujanggak were reorganized in his early reign period, King Jeongjo officially ordered the compilation of Ilseongnok, saying that he would deliver the diary that he recorded to future generations. Therefore, King Jeongjo was able to create the following narrative through Ilseongnok. First, the succession of royal authority from King Yeongjo to King Jeongjo was very ‘beautiful and just’. Second, the ‘heinous conspiracy’ of the ‘those who interfered with the succession of royal authority’ completely failed. Ilseongnok pursued not only the creation of such a specific narrative but also the deletion of facts at the same time. All the specific circumstances of the Imohwabyeon that occurred during the Yeongjo period were completely deleted. This is because it was an incident that did not help consolidate his legitimacy. In short, it can be evaluated that the creation of a new official chronicle called Ilseongnok was a product for political purposes to consolidate King Jeongjo's legitimacy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 허태구, "정조의 무치" 휴머니스트 2020

2 김백철, "정조 초반 『明義錄』과 王權의 위상 - 만들어진 이미지와 실상의 경계" 대동문화연구원 (95) : 149-184, 2016

3 유본예, "일성록범례" 한국고전번역원 2015

4 이영림, "루이 14세는 없다" 푸른역사 2009

5 김건우, "규장각의 문서제도와 그 위상" 영남문화연구원 (21) : 175-202, 2012

6 "英祖實錄"

7 "英宗朝實錄廳儀軌 刪節廳謄錄"

8 "經世遺表 권1, 春官禮曹3 弘文館"

9 "無名子集"

10 "正祖東宮日記"

11 강순애, "正祖朝 奎章閣의 圖書編纂 및 刊行" 규장각한국학연구원 (9) : 97-128, 1986

12 "正祖實錄"

13 김영민, "正祖代 ‘壬午禍變’ 논의의 전개와 사회적 반향" 조선시대사학회 (40) : 281-320, 2007

14 "正宗大王實錄廳儀軌"

15 한상권, "朝鮮後期 社會와 訴冤制度" 一潮閣 90-99, 1996

16 정두희, "朝鮮建國史 資料로서의 『龍飛御天歌』" 68 : 1989

17 "明義錄 권1"

18 "明義錄 卷首 尊賢閣日記 下"

19 "明義錄 卷首 尊賢閣日記 上"

20 "日省錄序, 日省錄序"

21 "日省錄"

22 "承政院日記"

23 "弘齋全書"

24 "尊賢閣日記"

25 吳恒寧, "實錄의 儀禮性에 대한 硏究 ― 象徵性과 編纂慣例의 형성과정을 중심으로 ―" 조선시대사학회 (26) : 5-38, 2003

26 강순애, "奎章閣의 圖書頒賜에 관한 硏究" 1 : 1990

27 김용덕, "奎章閣考" 2 : 1957

28 이이화, "奎章閣小考" 규장각한국학연구원 (3) : 149-165, 1979

29 설석규, "奎章閣 硏究 上ㆍ下" 29ㆍ31 : 1986

30 정옥자, "奎章閣 抄啓文臣 研究" 규장각한국학연구원 (4) : 1-31, 1981

31 "國朝寶鑑"

32 "古芸堂筆記 권3, 內閣代撰日省錄"

33 홍순민, "『日省錄』의 편찬 과정과 구성 원리" 27 : 2004

34 연갑수, "『日省錄』의 사료적 가치와 활용 방안" 27 : 2004

35 이태진 ; 홍순민, "<일성록> 도삭의 실상과 경위" 규장각한국학연구원 (10) : 61-118, 1989

36 김문식, "18세기 국왕의 왕실자료 편찬과 봉모당" 한국학중앙연구원 (40) : 36-66, 2018

37 최승희, "1873年(高宗 10) 日省錄의 一部 燒失과 改修" 규장각한국학연구원 (12) : 1-18, 1989