RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인문전산학과 문학연구: 소략한 개관 = Humanities Computing and Literary Studies: A Brief Sketch

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A87025191

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper aims at examining the emerging academic discipline called humanities computing particularly in regard to the literary studies that finds itself within a strange cultural environment of new media. The first part is a general survey of the origin and the subsequent developments of humanities computing beginning from Roberto Busa`s concordance of Thomas Aquinas, which is followed by a critical discussion of Willard McCathy`s definition. John Unsworth`s theoretical explanation of humanities computing as an academic discipline is also examined. The second part is a full-scale discussion of the hypertext theory in regard to its enormous impact upon the topography of traditional literary studies. The theories of hypertext are critically examined particularly regarding its positive or negative effects on the traditional literary scholarship. Ted Nelson`s famous definition, James Bolter`s classic idea of hypertextual writing space, George Landow`s quick-witted summary of hypertext as a perfect embodiment of deconstructive textual theories are all discussed in detail. The conclusion is that the humanities computing`s contribution to the literary scholarship is real and substantial enough by any standard, but have not quite lived up to what some enthusiasts had claimed; humanities computing has been useful more as a technical assistance than as a whole new academic discipline so far. But humanities computing has done enough to present itself as the most feasible way available for humanities scholars to adapt themselves to the quickly evolving culture of information society
      번역하기

      This paper aims at examining the emerging academic discipline called humanities computing particularly in regard to the literary studies that finds itself within a strange cultural environment of new media. The first part is a general survey of the or...

      This paper aims at examining the emerging academic discipline called humanities computing particularly in regard to the literary studies that finds itself within a strange cultural environment of new media. The first part is a general survey of the origin and the subsequent developments of humanities computing beginning from Roberto Busa`s concordance of Thomas Aquinas, which is followed by a critical discussion of Willard McCathy`s definition. John Unsworth`s theoretical explanation of humanities computing as an academic discipline is also examined. The second part is a full-scale discussion of the hypertext theory in regard to its enormous impact upon the topography of traditional literary studies. The theories of hypertext are critically examined particularly regarding its positive or negative effects on the traditional literary scholarship. Ted Nelson`s famous definition, James Bolter`s classic idea of hypertextual writing space, George Landow`s quick-witted summary of hypertext as a perfect embodiment of deconstructive textual theories are all discussed in detail. The conclusion is that the humanities computing`s contribution to the literary scholarship is real and substantial enough by any standard, but have not quite lived up to what some enthusiasts had claimed; humanities computing has been useful more as a technical assistance than as a whole new academic discipline so far. But humanities computing has done enough to present itself as the most feasible way available for humanities scholars to adapt themselves to the quickly evolving culture of information society

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "정보화시대의 인문학 과학주의의 도전과 새로운 인문학의 가능성" 7 : 289-320, 2000

      2 "ertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology" Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP 1997

      3 "Writing in Space and the History of Writing" 1991

      4 "What is Humanities Computing and What is Not?" 2002

      5 "What Is Humanities Computing?: Toward a Definition of the Field" 1998

      6 "The Text Ported" 17 : 77-87, 2002

      7 "The State of the Art"

      8 "The Library versus the Internet: Literary Studies under Siege?" 116 : 1405-1414, 2001

      9 "The History of Humanities Computing"

      10 "The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age" 1994

      1 "정보화시대의 인문학 과학주의의 도전과 새로운 인문학의 가능성" 7 : 289-320, 2000

      2 "ertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology" Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP 1997

      3 "Writing in Space and the History of Writing" 1991

      4 "What is Humanities Computing and What is Not?" 2002

      5 "What Is Humanities Computing?: Toward a Definition of the Field" 1998

      6 "The Text Ported" 17 : 77-87, 2002

      7 "The State of the Art"

      8 "The Library versus the Internet: Literary Studies under Siege?" 116 : 1405-1414, 2001

      9 "The History of Humanities Computing"

      10 "The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age" 1994

      11 "The Death of Literature" 1990

      12 "Special Section: Reconceiving Text Analysis: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism" 18 : 167-74, 2003

      13 "Radiant Textuality: Literature After the World Wide Web" New York: Palgrave 2001

      14 "Literary Criticism and Literary Computing: The Difficulties of a Synthesis" 22 : 91-97, 1998

      15 "Hypermedia and Literary Studies" Massachusetts: MIT P, 1995

      16 "Humanities Computing" New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2005

      17 "From Humanities Computing to Humanistic Informatics Creating a Field of Our Own" (/hi/espen/>) :

      18 "Cybertext: Perspective on Ergodic Literature" Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP 1997

      19 "A Companion to Digital Humanities" Victoria: Blackwell 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-08-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : SESK -> 영미문학연구
      외국어명 : SESK -> Journal of English Studies in Korea
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : SESK
      외국어명 : SESK
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.16 0.13 0.694 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼