RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      족부족관절 분야의 환자 자가 보고 결과 평가법 = Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of the Foot and Ankle

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108059512

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in assessing the patient’s overall health, lesion-specific outcomes, and condition-specific outcomes. PROMs are also known as “scoring systems” and are usually in questionnaires. There ...

      The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in assessing the patient’s overall health, lesion-specific outcomes, and condition-specific outcomes. PROMs are also known as “scoring systems” and are usually in questionnaires. There are almost a hundred different PROMs available in foot and ankle surgery. Each PROM has its merits, demerits, and validity. Selecting an appropriate PROM is important for adequately evaluating a patient’s health status. This article summarizes the most frequently used PROMs in the literature on foot and ankle surgery and presents the authors’ recommendations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김유미 ; 이동연 ; 이준형 ; 김진 ; 김지범 ; 김범수 ; 최기원 ; 서상교 ; 김준범 ; 박세진 ; 김윤정 ; 최영락 ; 이동오 ; 조재호 ; 천동일 ; 김형년 ; 박재용, "족부 족관절 질환 환자에서 전자식 족부 기능 지수의 인증: 임의 배정, 전향적, 다기관 연구" 대한족부족관절학회 23 (23): 24-30, 2019

      2 Naal FD, "Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?" 468 : 815-826, 2010

      3 Gosling CM, "Validity of outcome measures used to assess one and six month outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients" 42 : 1443-1448, 2011

      4 Ferreira-Valente MA, "Validity of four pain intensity rating scales" 152 : 2399-2404, 2011

      5 Mani SB, "Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity" 34 : 1140-1146, 2013

      6 Park YH, "Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean translation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score" 22 : 876-, 2021

      7 Hunt KJ, "Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research" 95 : e118-, 2013

      8 van Tulder M, "Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group" 28 : 1290-1299, 2003

      9 Lee KM, "Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score(FAOS)" 32 : 1443-1450, 2013

      10 Budiman-Mak E, "Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index" 27 : 519-527, 2006

      1 김유미 ; 이동연 ; 이준형 ; 김진 ; 김지범 ; 김범수 ; 최기원 ; 서상교 ; 김준범 ; 박세진 ; 김윤정 ; 최영락 ; 이동오 ; 조재호 ; 천동일 ; 김형년 ; 박재용, "족부 족관절 질환 환자에서 전자식 족부 기능 지수의 인증: 임의 배정, 전향적, 다기관 연구" 대한족부족관절학회 23 (23): 24-30, 2019

      2 Naal FD, "Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?" 468 : 815-826, 2010

      3 Gosling CM, "Validity of outcome measures used to assess one and six month outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients" 42 : 1443-1448, 2011

      4 Ferreira-Valente MA, "Validity of four pain intensity rating scales" 152 : 2399-2404, 2011

      5 Mani SB, "Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity" 34 : 1140-1146, 2013

      6 Park YH, "Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean translation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score" 22 : 876-, 2021

      7 Hunt KJ, "Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research" 95 : e118-, 2013

      8 van Tulder M, "Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group" 28 : 1290-1299, 2003

      9 Lee KM, "Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score(FAOS)" 32 : 1443-1450, 2013

      10 Budiman-Mak E, "Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index" 27 : 519-527, 2006

      11 In TS, "The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints" 29 : 53-56, 2017

      12 Hijji FY, "The popularity of outcome measures used in the foot and ankle literature" 13 : 58-68, 2020

      13 Ware JE Jr, "The MOS 36-item short-form health survey(SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection" 30 : 473-483, 1992

      14 Budiman-Mak E, "The Foot Function Index : a measure of foot pain and disability" 44 : 561-570, 1991

      15 Mokkink LB, "The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes" 63 : 737-745, 2010

      16 Nilsson-Helander K, "The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score(ATRS) : development and validation" 35 : 421-426, 2007

      17 Laucis NC, "Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics : a brief guide" 97 : 1628-1634, 2015

      18 Madeley NJ, "Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis" 33 : 57-63, 2012

      19 Dawson J, "Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire(MOXFQ)compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus" 15 : 918-931, 2007

      20 Huh JW, "Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Foot Function Index" 55 : 759-761, 2016

      21 Pinsker E, "Reliability and validity of 6 measures of pain, function, and disability for ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis" 36 : 617-625, 2015

      22 Hale SA, "Reliability and sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in subjects with chronic ankle instability" 40 : 35-40, 2005

      23 Terwee CB, "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires" 60 : 34-42, 2007

      24 Golightly YM, "Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis" 66 : 395-403, 2014

      25 McKeown R, "Primary outcome measures used in interventional trials for ankle fractures : a systematic review" 20 : 388-, 2019

      26 Hunt KJ, "Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery" 49 : 277-289, 2018

      27 Lakey E, "Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle orthopedics" 4 : 2473011419852930-, 2019

      28 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), "Patient reported outcome measures. Quality Measures" AAOS

      29 Wing KJ, "Measuring the operative treatment effect in end-stage ankle arthritis:are we asking the right questions? A COFAS multicenter study" 38 : 1064-1069, 2017

      30 Busija L, "Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery" 6 : 55-, 2008

      31 Kersten P, "Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis" 9 : e99485-, 2014

      32 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, "Instruments for collection of orthopaedic quality data" American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2016

      33 Scott J, "Graphic representation of pain" 2 : 175-184, 1976

      34 Martin RL, "Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure(FAAM)" 26 : 968-983, 2005

      35 Venkatesan M, "Evaluation of validity, reliability, and feasibility of 3 patient-reported foot and ankle outcome measures" 59 : 507-512, 2020

      36 EuroQol Group, "EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life" 16 : 199-208, 1990

      37 Brooks R, "EuroQol : the current state of play" 37 : 53-72, 1996

      38 Malviya A, "Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery" 28 : 494-498, 2007

      39 Park JY, "Comparison between an electronic version of the foot and ankle outcome score and the standard paper version : a randomized multicenter study" 98 : e17440-, 2019

      40 Kitaoka HB, "Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, mid-foot, hallux, and lesser toes" 15 : 349-353, 1994

      41 Prinsen CAC, "COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patientreported outcome measures" 27 : 1147-1157, 2018

      42 Croft S, "Association of Ankle Arthritis Score with need for revision surgery" 38 : 939-943, 2017

      43 Domsic RT, "Ankle osteoarthritis scale" 19 : 466-471, 1998

      44 Pinsker E, "AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems" 32 : 841-842, 2011

      45 Shazadeh Safavi P, "A systematic review of the outcome evaluation tools for the foot and ankle" 12 : 461-470, 2019

      46 Kearney RS, "A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess Achilles tendon rupture management : what’s being used and should we be using it?" 46 : 1102-1109, 2012

      47 Jia Y, "A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases" 26 : 1969-2010, 2017

      48 Jenkinson C, "A shorter form health survey : can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?" 19 : 179-186, 1997

      49 Budiman-Mak E, "A review of the foot function index and the foot function index-revised" 6 : 5-, 2013

      50 Dawson J, "A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery : validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus" 15 : 1211-1222, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.11 0.28 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼