The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in assessing the patient’s overall health, lesion-specific outcomes, and condition-specific outcomes. PROMs are also known as “scoring systems” and are usually in questionnaires. There ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108059512
Kim Jiyoun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea) ; Kim Bom Soo (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea)
2022
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
1-8(8쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in assessing the patient’s overall health, lesion-specific outcomes, and condition-specific outcomes. PROMs are also known as “scoring systems” and are usually in questionnaires. There ...
The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in assessing the patient’s overall health, lesion-specific outcomes, and condition-specific outcomes. PROMs are also known as “scoring systems” and are usually in questionnaires. There are almost a hundred different PROMs available in foot and ankle surgery. Each PROM has its merits, demerits, and validity. Selecting an appropriate PROM is important for adequately evaluating a patient’s health status. This article summarizes the most frequently used PROMs in the literature on foot and ankle surgery and presents the authors’ recommendations.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김유미 ; 이동연 ; 이준형 ; 김진 ; 김지범 ; 김범수 ; 최기원 ; 서상교 ; 김준범 ; 박세진 ; 김윤정 ; 최영락 ; 이동오 ; 조재호 ; 천동일 ; 김형년 ; 박재용, "족부 족관절 질환 환자에서 전자식 족부 기능 지수의 인증: 임의 배정, 전향적, 다기관 연구" 대한족부족관절학회 23 (23): 24-30, 2019
2 Naal FD, "Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?" 468 : 815-826, 2010
3 Gosling CM, "Validity of outcome measures used to assess one and six month outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients" 42 : 1443-1448, 2011
4 Ferreira-Valente MA, "Validity of four pain intensity rating scales" 152 : 2399-2404, 2011
5 Mani SB, "Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity" 34 : 1140-1146, 2013
6 Park YH, "Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean translation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score" 22 : 876-, 2021
7 Hunt KJ, "Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research" 95 : e118-, 2013
8 van Tulder M, "Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group" 28 : 1290-1299, 2003
9 Lee KM, "Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score(FAOS)" 32 : 1443-1450, 2013
10 Budiman-Mak E, "Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index" 27 : 519-527, 2006
1 김유미 ; 이동연 ; 이준형 ; 김진 ; 김지범 ; 김범수 ; 최기원 ; 서상교 ; 김준범 ; 박세진 ; 김윤정 ; 최영락 ; 이동오 ; 조재호 ; 천동일 ; 김형년 ; 박재용, "족부 족관절 질환 환자에서 전자식 족부 기능 지수의 인증: 임의 배정, 전향적, 다기관 연구" 대한족부족관절학회 23 (23): 24-30, 2019
2 Naal FD, "Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?" 468 : 815-826, 2010
3 Gosling CM, "Validity of outcome measures used to assess one and six month outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients" 42 : 1443-1448, 2011
4 Ferreira-Valente MA, "Validity of four pain intensity rating scales" 152 : 2399-2404, 2011
5 Mani SB, "Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity" 34 : 1140-1146, 2013
6 Park YH, "Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean translation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score" 22 : 876-, 2021
7 Hunt KJ, "Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research" 95 : e118-, 2013
8 van Tulder M, "Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group" 28 : 1290-1299, 2003
9 Lee KM, "Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score(FAOS)" 32 : 1443-1450, 2013
10 Budiman-Mak E, "Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index" 27 : 519-527, 2006
11 In TS, "The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints" 29 : 53-56, 2017
12 Hijji FY, "The popularity of outcome measures used in the foot and ankle literature" 13 : 58-68, 2020
13 Ware JE Jr, "The MOS 36-item short-form health survey(SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection" 30 : 473-483, 1992
14 Budiman-Mak E, "The Foot Function Index : a measure of foot pain and disability" 44 : 561-570, 1991
15 Mokkink LB, "The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes" 63 : 737-745, 2010
16 Nilsson-Helander K, "The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score(ATRS) : development and validation" 35 : 421-426, 2007
17 Laucis NC, "Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics : a brief guide" 97 : 1628-1634, 2015
18 Madeley NJ, "Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis" 33 : 57-63, 2012
19 Dawson J, "Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire(MOXFQ)compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus" 15 : 918-931, 2007
20 Huh JW, "Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Foot Function Index" 55 : 759-761, 2016
21 Pinsker E, "Reliability and validity of 6 measures of pain, function, and disability for ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis" 36 : 617-625, 2015
22 Hale SA, "Reliability and sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in subjects with chronic ankle instability" 40 : 35-40, 2005
23 Terwee CB, "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires" 60 : 34-42, 2007
24 Golightly YM, "Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis" 66 : 395-403, 2014
25 McKeown R, "Primary outcome measures used in interventional trials for ankle fractures : a systematic review" 20 : 388-, 2019
26 Hunt KJ, "Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery" 49 : 277-289, 2018
27 Lakey E, "Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle orthopedics" 4 : 2473011419852930-, 2019
28 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), "Patient reported outcome measures. Quality Measures" AAOS
29 Wing KJ, "Measuring the operative treatment effect in end-stage ankle arthritis:are we asking the right questions? A COFAS multicenter study" 38 : 1064-1069, 2017
30 Busija L, "Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery" 6 : 55-, 2008
31 Kersten P, "Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis" 9 : e99485-, 2014
32 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, "Instruments for collection of orthopaedic quality data" American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2016
33 Scott J, "Graphic representation of pain" 2 : 175-184, 1976
34 Martin RL, "Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure(FAAM)" 26 : 968-983, 2005
35 Venkatesan M, "Evaluation of validity, reliability, and feasibility of 3 patient-reported foot and ankle outcome measures" 59 : 507-512, 2020
36 EuroQol Group, "EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life" 16 : 199-208, 1990
37 Brooks R, "EuroQol : the current state of play" 37 : 53-72, 1996
38 Malviya A, "Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery" 28 : 494-498, 2007
39 Park JY, "Comparison between an electronic version of the foot and ankle outcome score and the standard paper version : a randomized multicenter study" 98 : e17440-, 2019
40 Kitaoka HB, "Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, mid-foot, hallux, and lesser toes" 15 : 349-353, 1994
41 Prinsen CAC, "COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patientreported outcome measures" 27 : 1147-1157, 2018
42 Croft S, "Association of Ankle Arthritis Score with need for revision surgery" 38 : 939-943, 2017
43 Domsic RT, "Ankle osteoarthritis scale" 19 : 466-471, 1998
44 Pinsker E, "AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems" 32 : 841-842, 2011
45 Shazadeh Safavi P, "A systematic review of the outcome evaluation tools for the foot and ankle" 12 : 461-470, 2019
46 Kearney RS, "A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess Achilles tendon rupture management : what’s being used and should we be using it?" 46 : 1102-1109, 2012
47 Jia Y, "A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases" 26 : 1969-2010, 2017
48 Jenkinson C, "A shorter form health survey : can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?" 19 : 179-186, 1997
49 Budiman-Mak E, "A review of the foot function index and the foot function index-revised" 6 : 5-, 2013
50 Dawson J, "A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery : validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus" 15 : 1211-1222, 2006
만성 족관절 불안정성을 가진 환자군에서 변형 브로스트롬 술식과 봉합 테이프를 추가한 술식 간의 결과 비교
의인성 표재비골신경 손상에 대한 골 내 신경이전술 치료: 2예 보고
COVID-19 백신 투여 이후 발생한 심한 사지 자반증이 절단을 요하는 당뇨발에 미치는 영향: 증례 보고
족관절 인대 손상 치료 동향: 대한족부족관절학회 회원 설문조사 분석
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.1 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.09 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0 |