RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영재교사 및 부모에 의한 과학영재 행동평정의 비교와 과학적 수행 예측력 고찰 = Gifted Behavior Ratings by Teachers` and Parents` Nominations and Their Scientific Performance Predictions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82697886

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to compare gifted behavior ratings by teachers and parents and to predict scientific performances of elementary gifted students by them. The participants of this study were 894 elementary gifted students who took the scientific performance test. This study asked gifted teachers and parents to rate gifted behaviors of these gifted students with using SRBCSS-R(Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002). The results indicated that gifted teachers rated gifted behaviors of the 5th grade gifted students lower than those of other grade students, especially in ``learning`` and ``motivation.`` Meanwhile, there was significant interaction effect of grade and gender in ``learning`` and ``scientific characteristics`` ratings by parents. In compacting the gifted behavior ratings by gifted teachers and parents, there was significant difference in ``scientific characteristics`` ratings. That is, parents rated significantly higher ``scientific characteristics`` of gifted students than gifted teachers. When this study explored the prediction of gifted behavior ratings by gifted teachers and parents on scientific performance of gifted students, ``scientific characteristics`` ratings by gifted teachers predicted the scientific performance of gifted students and explained 2% of the variance in scientific performance of gifted students.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to compare gifted behavior ratings by teachers and parents and to predict scientific performances of elementary gifted students by them. The participants of this study were 894 elementary gifted students who took the scie...

    The purpose of this study was to compare gifted behavior ratings by teachers and parents and to predict scientific performances of elementary gifted students by them. The participants of this study were 894 elementary gifted students who took the scientific performance test. This study asked gifted teachers and parents to rate gifted behaviors of these gifted students with using SRBCSS-R(Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002). The results indicated that gifted teachers rated gifted behaviors of the 5th grade gifted students lower than those of other grade students, especially in ``learning`` and ``motivation.`` Meanwhile, there was significant interaction effect of grade and gender in ``learning`` and ``scientific characteristics`` ratings by parents. In compacting the gifted behavior ratings by gifted teachers and parents, there was significant difference in ``scientific characteristics`` ratings. That is, parents rated significantly higher ``scientific characteristics`` of gifted students than gifted teachers. When this study explored the prediction of gifted behavior ratings by gifted teachers and parents on scientific performance of gifted students, ``scientific characteristics`` ratings by gifted teachers predicted the scientific performance of gifted students and explained 2% of the variance in scientific performance of gifted students.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 진현정, "한국어판 영재아 행동특성 평정척도(K-SRBCSS)의 개발과 타당화" 한국영재학회 20 (20): 621-647, 2010

    2 이동혁, "한국어판 Gifted Rating Scale의 구인타당도" 한국영재학회 20 (20): 595-619, 2010

    3 류지영, "영재학급 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰․추천 영재판별모형 개발 연구" 한국영재학회 20 (20): 257-287, 2010

    4 이미순, "영재아 행동특성 평정척도" 박학사 2007

    5 Clark, B, "영재교육과 재능계발" 시그마프레스 2008

    6 한기순, "영재교사들이 지각하는 관찰-추천 영재판별 시스템의 방향, 중요도, 실행수준 분석: 개념도 연구법을 활용하여" 한국영재학회 21 (21): 107-122, 2011

    7 조석희, "소외된 과학영재의 발굴 및 교육 방안: 특성, 판별 및 교육실태분석을 중심으로" 한국교육개발원 2006

    8 류지영, "관찰·추천을 통한 영재판별에 대한 영재담당교사들의 인식과 태도" 한국교원교육학회 27 (27): 159-178, 2010

    9 임지룡, "관찰·추천을 통한 언어 영재의 선발 방안" 중등교육연구소 58 (58): 261-288, 2010

    10 박민정, "과학 영재교육 대상자 선발방법으로써 교사 추천제 분석: 학생의 과학적 태도, 탐구력, 사고력, 문제 해결력, 창의성을 중심으로" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 111-119, 2008

    1 진현정, "한국어판 영재아 행동특성 평정척도(K-SRBCSS)의 개발과 타당화" 한국영재학회 20 (20): 621-647, 2010

    2 이동혁, "한국어판 Gifted Rating Scale의 구인타당도" 한국영재학회 20 (20): 595-619, 2010

    3 류지영, "영재학급 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰․추천 영재판별모형 개발 연구" 한국영재학회 20 (20): 257-287, 2010

    4 이미순, "영재아 행동특성 평정척도" 박학사 2007

    5 Clark, B, "영재교육과 재능계발" 시그마프레스 2008

    6 한기순, "영재교사들이 지각하는 관찰-추천 영재판별 시스템의 방향, 중요도, 실행수준 분석: 개념도 연구법을 활용하여" 한국영재학회 21 (21): 107-122, 2011

    7 조석희, "소외된 과학영재의 발굴 및 교육 방안: 특성, 판별 및 교육실태분석을 중심으로" 한국교육개발원 2006

    8 류지영, "관찰·추천을 통한 영재판별에 대한 영재담당교사들의 인식과 태도" 한국교원교육학회 27 (27): 159-178, 2010

    9 임지룡, "관찰·추천을 통한 언어 영재의 선발 방안" 중등교육연구소 58 (58): 261-288, 2010

    10 박민정, "과학 영재교육 대상자 선발방법으로써 교사 추천제 분석: 학생의 과학적 태도, 탐구력, 사고력, 문제 해결력, 창의성을 중심으로" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 111-119, 2008

    11 Sternberg, R. J, "What do we mean by giftedness? A pentagonal implicit theory" 39 : 88-94, 1995

    12 Li, H, "Validation of the gifted rating scales-school form in China" 52 : 160-169, 2008

    13 Tabachnick, B. G, "Using multivariate statistics(4th ed.)" Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon 2001

    14 Meisels, S. J, "Trusting teachers' judgements: A validity study of a curriculum-embedded performance assessment in kindergarten to grade 3" 38 : 73-95, 2001

    15 Renzulli, J. S, "The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence" CT: Creative Learning Press 1997

    16 Lee, D, "The reliability and validity of a Korean-translated version of the gifted rating scales" 24 : 210-224, 2006

    17 Reis, S. M, "The need for clarification in research designed to examine gender differences in achievement and accomplishment" 13 : 193-198, 1991

    18 Martison, R. A, "The identification of the gifted and talented" Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children 1975

    19 Leung, E. K, "The identification and social problem of the gifted bilingual bicultural children" 1981

    20 Pfeiffer, S. I, "The gifted rating scales-school form" 51 : 39-50, 2007

    21 Sternberg, R. J, "The concept of giftedness: A pentagonal implicit theory. In The origins and development of high ability" A Wiley-Interscience Publication 5-21, 1993

    22 Davidson, K, "The case against formal identification" 9 : 7-11, 1986

    23 Sharpley, C. F, "Teachers' ratings vs. standardized tests: An empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement" 23 : 106-111, 1986

    24 Perry, N. E, "Teachers' judgments of students' academic performance" Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education 1996

    25 Hoge, R. D, "Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of the literature" 59 : 297-313, 1989

    26 Borland, J. H, "Teacher identification of the gifted: A new look" 2 : 22-32, 1978

    27 Bloom, B. S, "Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain" NY: Longman 1956

    28 Renzulli, J. S, "Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented" CT: Creative Learning Press 1986

    29 Benbow, C. P, "SMPY's model for teaching mathematically precocious students. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented" CT: Creative Learning Press 1-26, 1986

    30 Mooney, P, "Reliability and validity of the behavioral and emotional rating scale-second edition:Parent rating scale" 27 : 147-155, 2005

    31 Hoge, R. D, "Psychometric properties of teacher-judgements measures of pupil aptitudes, classroom behaviors, and achievement levels" 17 : 401-429, 1983

    32 Trost, G, "Prediction of excellence in school, higher education and work. In International handbook of giftedness and talent(2nd ed.)" Elsevier Science LTD 317-327, 2000

    33 Borland, J. H, "Planning and implementing programs for the gifted" NY:Teachers College Press 1989

    34 Li, H, "Parent ratings using the gifted rating scales-school form: Reliability and validity for Chinese students" 68 : 659-675, 2008

    35 U.S. Department of Education, "National excellence: A case for developing America's talent" Washington, DC: Author 1993

    36 Peters, S. J, "Multigroup construct validity evidence of the HOPE scale: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs" 54 : 298-313, 2010

    37 Petscher, Y, "Measurement invariance of the Chinese gifted rating scales" 26 : 275-286, 2008

    38 Young, K. T, "Listening to parents: A national survey of parents with young children" 152 : 255-262, 1998

    39 Pfeiffer, S. I, "Identifying young gifted children using the gifted rating scales-preschool/kindergarten form" 52 : 19-29, 2008

    40 Jarosewich, T, "Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A reviews of existing instruments" 20 : 322-336, 2002

    41 Pfeiffer, S. I, "Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions" 1 : 31-50, 2002

    42 Shwedel, A. M., "Identification. In The underserved: Our young gifted children" The Council for Exceptional Children 17-39, 1983

    43 Hagen, E, "Identification of the gifted" NY: Teachers College Press 1980

    44 Schack, G. D, "Identification of gifted students: An analysis of criteria preferred by preservice teachers, classroom teachers, and teachers of the gifted" 13 : 346-363, 1990

    45 Shore, B. M, "Identification by provision: Limited field test of a radical alternative for identifying gifted students. In Identifying and nurturing their gifted" Berne: Huber 92-100, 1986

    46 Pfeiffer, S. I, "Gifted identification beyond the IQ test: Rating scales and other assessment procedures. In Handbook of giftedness in children" NY: Springer 177-198, 2008

    47 Pfeiffer, S. I, "Gifted Rating Scales(GRS)" San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation 2003

    48 Gottfried, A. W, "Gifted IQ:Early developmental aspects, the Fullerton longitudinal study" NY: Plenum 1994

    49 Funderburk, B. W, "Further psychometric evaluation of the Eyberg and Behar rating scales for parents and teachers of preschoolers" 14 : 67-81, 2003

    50 Siegle, D, "Factors that influence in-service and preservice teachers' nominations of students for gifted and talented programs" 33 : 337-360, 2010

    51 Siegle, D, "Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs" 48 : 21-29, 2004

    52 Chan, W. D, "Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and student self-reports in Hong Kong" 11 : 69-82, 2000

    53 Davis, G. A, "Education of the gifted and talented(5th ed.)" Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon 2004

    54 Kenny, D. A, "Early reading performance: A comparison of teacher based and test-based assessment" 26 : 227-236, 1993

    55 Ford, D. Y, "Desegregating gifted education. In Rethinking gifted education" NY: Teachers College Press 143-158, 2003

    56 Frasier, M. M, "Core attributes of giftedness: A foundation for recognizing the gifted potential of minority and economically disadvantaged students" The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented 1995

    57 Silverstein, A. B, "Convergent and discriminant validation of two methods of assessing three academic traits" 17 : 63-68, 1983

    58 Lee, S.-Y, "Comparison between talent search students qualifying via scores on standardized tests and via parent nomination" 28 : 157-166, 2006

    59 Sankar-Deleeuw, N, "Case studies of gifted kindergarten children Part II:The parents and teachers" 29 : 93-99, 2007

    60 Hoge, R. D, "Analysis of teacher judgements of pupil achievement levels" 76 : 777-781, 1984

    61 Renzulli, J. S, "An investigation of the reliability and factor structure of four new scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students" 21 : 84-107, 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼