RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전 = The Formation and the Development of National History in the Pre-Modern Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82434629

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper has reviewed the process how the national history had been formed and developed in pre-modern Korea. The national history was viewed as the history of one’s own country, i.e. the history of a dynasty and as the history of a historical community, i.e. the history of a nation. This viewpoint was completed in Dongguktonggam(Comprehensive Mirror of the Eastern Kingdom) in the 15th century. This was the official history of a nation compiled by bureaucrats and the political history played a key role. In the latter half of the Joseon dynasty, there was a tendency even the historical record of an individual was included in the national history. A private recording of the present history of his kingdom was practiced during this period. The historical science of the East Asia including Korea was the “documentary-centered history” preserving the record thoroughly. The historical science focusing on the record had been developed from the history of a dynasty to the comprehensive history that had been enlarged to the historical concept of the records of both a nation and an individual were combined. Also, as a classified history, the whole history since Dangun(LegendaryFounder of Korea) and all the contents of history up to the Joseon dynasty were treated and resulted in Donggukmunheonbigo(Reference Compilation of Documents on Korea) of all the official and personal records compiled and arranged. History came to be enlarged and developed from the political history of a nation to the history of system, economy, society and culture and contained not only the history of a nation but also the materials of civilian lives including personal or clan history. The national history of the West was a product of modern nationalism and a man-made one. However, in case of Korea, the national history had long been arranged before nationalism appeared. This is what distinguished the national history of Korea from the Western history of a nation. The new modification of the national history of Korea had developed was caused by the acceptance of Western historical science and the drastic change of the Korean society. Korean history has been changed from the historical science focusing on records to the historical science focusing on description and has also been developed as the learning to explain the present situation. In such process of the development, the modern Korean history was distorted as the exclusive nationalistic history owed to the Japanese colonial rule. The rise and the fall of the nation had once been the key problem of the historical science. This cannot be the right path of the historical science. At the present, it is thought that it is time the term of ‘nation’ to be duly deleted in history as our society has been rapidly changing into a multiracial society. The national history should be renamed as Korean history and take on universality and objectivity in respect of describing the history of human lives.
    번역하기

    This paper has reviewed the process how the national history had been formed and developed in pre-modern Korea. The national history was viewed as the history of one’s own country, i.e. the history of a dynasty and as the history of a historical com...

    This paper has reviewed the process how the national history had been formed and developed in pre-modern Korea. The national history was viewed as the history of one’s own country, i.e. the history of a dynasty and as the history of a historical community, i.e. the history of a nation. This viewpoint was completed in Dongguktonggam(Comprehensive Mirror of the Eastern Kingdom) in the 15th century. This was the official history of a nation compiled by bureaucrats and the political history played a key role. In the latter half of the Joseon dynasty, there was a tendency even the historical record of an individual was included in the national history. A private recording of the present history of his kingdom was practiced during this period. The historical science of the East Asia including Korea was the “documentary-centered history” preserving the record thoroughly. The historical science focusing on the record had been developed from the history of a dynasty to the comprehensive history that had been enlarged to the historical concept of the records of both a nation and an individual were combined. Also, as a classified history, the whole history since Dangun(LegendaryFounder of Korea) and all the contents of history up to the Joseon dynasty were treated and resulted in Donggukmunheonbigo(Reference Compilation of Documents on Korea) of all the official and personal records compiled and arranged. History came to be enlarged and developed from the political history of a nation to the history of system, economy, society and culture and contained not only the history of a nation but also the materials of civilian lives including personal or clan history. The national history of the West was a product of modern nationalism and a man-made one. However, in case of Korea, the national history had long been arranged before nationalism appeared. This is what distinguished the national history of Korea from the Western history of a nation. The new modification of the national history of Korea had developed was caused by the acceptance of Western historical science and the drastic change of the Korean society. Korean history has been changed from the historical science focusing on records to the historical science focusing on description and has also been developed as the learning to explain the present situation. In such process of the development, the modern Korean history was distorted as the exclusive nationalistic history owed to the Japanese colonial rule. The rise and the fall of the nation had once been the key problem of the historical science. This cannot be the right path of the historical science. At the present, it is thought that it is time the term of ‘nation’ to be duly deleted in history as our society has been rapidly changing into a multiracial society. The national history should be renamed as Korean history and take on universality and objectivity in respect of describing the history of human lives.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 머리말 2. ‘국사’ 개념의 형성과 그 내용의 확충 3. 국가개념의 변천과 국사개념의 성격변화 4. 맺음말
    • 1. 머리말 2. ‘국사’ 개념의 형성과 그 내용의 확충 3. 국가개념의 변천과 국사개념의 성격변화 4. 맺음말
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 조동걸, "현대한국사학사" 나남출판 1998

    2 이윤갑, "한국역사학의 새로운 길 찾기-민족주의 역사학의 전망" 35 : 2007

    3 임지현, "한국사학계의 민족이해에 대한 비판적 조건" 역사비평사간 26 : 1994

    4 金基鳳, "한국 근대 역사개념의 성립 ―‘국사’의 탄생과 신채호의 민족사학―" 한국사학사학회 12 (12): 217-245, 2005

    5 김경수, "치평요람에 관한 연구" 21 (21): 1994

    6 박인호, "조선후기역사지리학연구" 이회 1996

    7 한영우, "조선후기사학사연구" 일지사 1989

    8 정구복, "조선후기 역사지리학의 발달" 연세대학교 국학연구원 1 : 2006

    9 한상권, "조선후기 사회와 訴寃제도" 일조각 1996

    10 정구복, "조선후기 사학사의 성격" 15 : 2007

    1 조동걸, "현대한국사학사" 나남출판 1998

    2 이윤갑, "한국역사학의 새로운 길 찾기-민족주의 역사학의 전망" 35 : 2007

    3 임지현, "한국사학계의 민족이해에 대한 비판적 조건" 역사비평사간 26 : 1994

    4 金基鳳, "한국 근대 역사개념의 성립 ―‘국사’의 탄생과 신채호의 민족사학―" 한국사학사학회 12 (12): 217-245, 2005

    5 김경수, "치평요람에 관한 연구" 21 (21): 1994

    6 박인호, "조선후기역사지리학연구" 이회 1996

    7 한영우, "조선후기사학사연구" 일지사 1989

    8 정구복, "조선후기 역사지리학의 발달" 연세대학교 국학연구원 1 : 2006

    9 한상권, "조선후기 사회와 訴寃제도" 일조각 1996

    10 정구복, "조선후기 사학사의 성격" 15 : 2007

    11 조성을, "조선후기 사학사연구" 한울 2004

    12 오항령, "조선초기 『치평요람』 편찬배경과 성격" 13 : 2006

    13 한영우, "조선전기사학사연구" 서울대학교출판부 1981

    14 차장섭, "이승휴, 문화관광부 2005년 10월의 인물" 2005

    15 박광용, "영조와 정조의 나라" 푸른역사 1998

    16 한영우, "역사학의 역사" 지식산업사 2002

    17 김태영, "실학의 국가개혁론" 서울대출판부 1998

    18 이영훈, "수량경제사로 다시 본 조선후기" 서울대출판부 2004

    19 정구복, "세종의 역사인식" 경인문화사 2 : 2002

    20 김경현, "서양고대의 역사서술과 수사학" 13 : 2006

    21 정구복, "삼국사기의 현대적 이해" 서울대출판부 2004

    22 김문식, "동국문헌비고‘예고’의 자료적 특징" 104 : 2007

    23 이기백, "나의 역사연구" 1 : 2000

    24 정구복, "고려조의 편찬문화" 집문당 1 : 1999

    25 변태섭, "고려사의 연구" 삼영사 1982

    26 노태돈, "5세기 금석문에 보이는 고구려인의 천하관" 서울대교 19 : 1988

    27 정구복, "16-17세기의 사찬사서의 편찬에 대한 일고" 1 : 1977

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-04-26 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society of History of Historiography KCI등재후보
    2005-04-10 학술지등록 한글명 : 韓國史學史學報
    외국어명 : The Korean Journal of History of Historiography
    KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.47 0.47 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.61 0.54 1.937 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼