본 연구는 유전자은행을 통한 유전자원활용을 극대화하기 위한 맥락에서 유전자은행의 유전자원이용에 대한 만족과 지속적 이용의 정도차이를 판별할 수 있는 요인, 즉 유전자원이용자(=연...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102202718
2016
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
95-113(19쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 유전자은행을 통한 유전자원활용을 극대화하기 위한 맥락에서 유전자은행의 유전자원이용에 대한 만족과 지속적 이용의 정도차이를 판별할 수 있는 요인, 즉 유전자원이용자(=연...
본 연구는 유전자은행을 통한 유전자원활용을 극대화하기 위한 맥락에서 유전자은행의 유전자원이용에 대한 만족과 지속적 이용의 정도차이를 판별할 수 있는 요인, 즉 유전자원이용자(=연구자)가 유전자원에 부여하는 유용성 속성을 실증적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 기존문헌 고찰을 통해 연구자들이 유전자원에 부여하는 유용성 속성을 연구 활동에의 부합성, 유용특성정보, 활용가치, 연구 활동의 촉진성, 신규성으로 도출하고, 미생물유전자원을 이용하는 연구자들을 대상으로 유전자원이용정도가 높은 집단과 낮은 집단(유전자원이용에 대한 만족과 지속적 이용에 기초하여 분류)을 판별할 수 있는 유용성 속성의 파악을 위해 판별분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과, 5개의 유용성 속성 중에서 유전자원의 활용가치와 연구 활동에의 부합성이 판별력이 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 유용특성정보와 연구 활동의 촉진성은 판별력이 그리 높지 않았으며, 신규성은 판별력이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과에 기초하여 유전자원의 활용촉진을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제공하였으며, 본 연구의 한계점과 이를 극복하기 위한 향후 연구방향도 제시하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The study examines the question of what discriminant factors may affect differences between two groups classified by researchers’ satisfaction with and continuous use intention of genetic resources(microorganisms). Survey data from researchers who a...
The study examines the question of what discriminant factors may affect differences between two groups classified by researchers’ satisfaction with and continuous use intention of genetic resources(microorganisms). Survey data from researchers who are using microorganisms from a gene bank was used to empirically test. The survey, covering 150 researchers, was conducted from March 26 through April 17 2015. Linear discriminant analysis was used to test the research questions described in the study. Results from the tests show that utilization value and suitability of genetic resources for researchers’ R&D activities play key roles in discriminating between the two groups classified by researchers’ satisfaction with and continuous use intention of genetic resources, relatively lower and higher groups. The results indicate that useful trait information of and degree in promotion of researches by genetic resources appear to be weak in discriminating between the two groups, and that novelty of genetic resources does not play a crucial role in making a distinction between the two groups. We propose some policy implications based on the results of the study.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Schei, P. J., "“Genetic resource” in the CBD: The wording, the past, the present and the future" Fridtjof Nansens Institute 2010
2 Gulati, C., "‘The tragedy of the commons’in plant genetic resources : The need for a new international regime centered around International Biotechnology Paten Office" 4 : 2014
3 Schei, P. J., "‘Genetic resources’ in the CBD : The wording, the past, the present and the future" 6 : 533-543, 2010
4 Gollin, D., "Valuing animal genetic resources : Lessons from plant genetic resources" 45 : 353-363, 2003
5 Khoury, C., "Trends in ex situ conservation of plant genetic resource : A review of global crop and regional conservation strategies" 57 : 625-639, 2010
6 Oli, K. P., "Towards and accesses and benefit sharing framework agreement for the genetic resources and traditional knowledge of the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region"
7 Sarr, M., "The value of conserving genetic resources for R&D : A survey" 67 : 184-193, 2008
8 TEEB, "The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers" The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity 2009
9 OECD, "The bioeconomy to 2030 : Designing a policy agenda–Main findings and policy conclusions" OECD 2009
10 Ketchen, D. J., "The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research : An analysis and critique" 17 : 441-458, 1996
1 Schei, P. J., "“Genetic resource” in the CBD: The wording, the past, the present and the future" Fridtjof Nansens Institute 2010
2 Gulati, C., "‘The tragedy of the commons’in plant genetic resources : The need for a new international regime centered around International Biotechnology Paten Office" 4 : 2014
3 Schei, P. J., "‘Genetic resources’ in the CBD : The wording, the past, the present and the future" 6 : 533-543, 2010
4 Gollin, D., "Valuing animal genetic resources : Lessons from plant genetic resources" 45 : 353-363, 2003
5 Khoury, C., "Trends in ex situ conservation of plant genetic resource : A review of global crop and regional conservation strategies" 57 : 625-639, 2010
6 Oli, K. P., "Towards and accesses and benefit sharing framework agreement for the genetic resources and traditional knowledge of the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region"
7 Sarr, M., "The value of conserving genetic resources for R&D : A survey" 67 : 184-193, 2008
8 TEEB, "The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers" The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity 2009
9 OECD, "The bioeconomy to 2030 : Designing a policy agenda–Main findings and policy conclusions" OECD 2009
10 Ketchen, D. J., "The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research : An analysis and critique" 17 : 441-458, 1996
11 Sagnia, B. K., "Strengthening local creative industries and developing culture capacity for proverty alleviation" 2005
12 FAO, "Second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture" 2009
13 Upadhyaya, H. D., "Plant genetic resources management : Collection, characterization, conservation and utilization" 6 : 1-14, 2008
14 Fowler, C., "Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture : Assessing global availability" 29 : 143-179, 2004
15 Varaprasad, K. S., "Plant genetic resources conservation and use in light of recent policy developments" 1 : 1276-1293, 2010
16 Rao, N. K., "Plant genetic resources : Advancing conservation and use through biotechnology" 3 : 136-145, 2004
17 Ukalska, J., "Phenotypical diversity of winter triticale genotypes collected in the Polish gene bank between 1982 and 2008 with regard to major quantitative traits" 149 : 203-212, 2013
18 Harman, H. H, "Modern Factor Analysis" University of Chicago Press 1976
19 Fedder, B, "Marine Genetic Resources, Access and Benefit Sharing: Legal and biological perspectives" Routledge 2013
20 Rubenstein, K. D., "International exchange of genetic resources, the role of information and implications for ownership: The case of the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System" Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute 2004
21 WIPO, "Intergovernmental committee on intellectual property and genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore: The national policy on traditional knowledge, genetic resources and traditional cultural expressions(Kenya)" The Secretariat of World Intellectual Property Organization 2010
22 Noriega, I. L., "How policies affect the use of plant genetic resources : The experience of the CGIAR" 2 : 231-269, 2013
23 McCouch, S. R., "Genomics of gene banks : A case study in rice" 99 : 407-423, 2012
24 Dekkers, F., "Genetic databases: Assessing the benefits and the impact on human and patient rights" A network of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2005
25 Walters, C., "Genebanks in the post-genomic age : Emerging roles and anticipated uses" 9 : 68-71, 2008
26 Sung, B., "Firms’ intentions to use genetically modified organisms industrially : The influence of sociopoliticaleconomic forces and managerial interpretations in the Korean context" 80 : 1387-1394, 2013
27 CBD, "Factsheet: Uses of genetic resources"
28 Cohen, J. I., "Ex situ conservation of plant genetic resource : Global development and environmental concerns" 253 : 866-872, 1991
29 Beattie, A. J., "Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Current status and trends" Island Press 271-295, 2005
30 Roosen, J., "Economic evaluation and biodiversity conservation of animal genetic resources" 2008
31 NZBIO, "Driving economic growth Bio-Based industries" Bioeconomy Industry Summit of Research 2009
32 Rubenstein, K. D., "Crop genetic resources: An economic appraisal" Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture 2005
33 Cimato, A., "Conservation, characterization, collection and utilization of the genetic resources in olive" Common Fund for Commodities 2008
34 Wambugu, P., "Conservation utilization of African oryza genetic resources" 6 : 1-13, 2014
35 Desheva, G., "Conservation and utilization of wild species of genus Triticum form The National Genebank of Bulgaria" 12 : 94-98, 2014
36 Punj, G., "Cluster analysis in marketing research; review and suggestions for application" 20 : 134-148, 1983
37 Alderderfer, M. S., "Cluster Analysis" Sage 1984
38 Koo, B., "Biotechnology and Genetic Resource Policies: What is a Genebank Worth?" International Food Policy Research Institute(IFPRI) 1-3,
39 Padmanabhan, M., "Biocomplexity-conceptual challenges for institutional analysis in biodiversity governance" 81 : 70-79, 2012
40 Shankar, S., "Biobanking : Basic concepts and role in rheumatology" 6 : 129-137, 2011
41 Tvedt, M. W., "Beyond access : Exploring implementation of the fair and equitable sharing commitment in the CBD" International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 2007
42 Harrigan, K. P., "An application of clustering for strategic group analysis" 6 : 55-73, 1985
43 EC, "Agricultural Genetic Resources from conservation to sustainable use" COM 2013
44 Craighead, C. W., "Addressing common method variance : Guidelines for survey research on information technology, operations, and supply chain management" 58 : 578-588, 2011
45 Borokini, T. I., "A systematic compilation of endemic flora in Nigeria for conservation managemen" 62014 : 6406-6426,
46 미래창조과학부, "2013년도 생명연구자원관리 시행계획"
47 미래창조과학부, "2012 국가생명연구자원 통계자료집"
모바일 간편 결제 시스템의 신뢰형성에 대한 연구 - 계층적 신뢰모형 개발을 중심으로 -
직업가치가 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 있어 조직후원인식의 조절효과 - 외식업체 1년 미만 신입종사원을 중심으로 -
파워 유형과 파트너십 연계를 통한 공급사슬관리 개선방안 모색
전문직종사자의 금융서비스 제공에 관한 법적 고찰과 국내 시사점 - 영국 금융서비스 및 시장법 체계를 바탕으로 -
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2012-01-01 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 경영정보연구 -> 경영과 정보연구외국어명 : Management Information Review -> Management & Information Systems Review | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.91 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 0.18 |