This research is to understand youth leader's personal elements(demographic variables, ego-resilience) and environmental elements(social support) effect on psychological burnout so that establish psychological burnout prevention and treatment of youth...
This research is to understand youth leader's personal elements(demographic variables, ego-resilience) and environmental elements(social support) effect on psychological burnout so that establish psychological burnout prevention and treatment of youth leader.
To perform this purpose, first, I studied youth leader's ego-resilience effect on psychological burnout and second, youth leader's relationships of social support and psychological burnout were divided into social support source and suport source.
The subjects were total 177 trades who are in youth center, youth counseling, physical life training and work support training in Seoul area. The measurement tools are ego-resilience criterion(Park Hyeonjin, 1996), social support criterion(Park Jiwon, 1985; Yoon Hyejeong, 1993), demotivation criterion(Park Heeyeon and Kim Gwangwoong, 2005). The analysis method was used SPSS 17.0 and to figure out general characters, frequency analysis was conducted. Moreover, t-test, ANOVA analysis were conducted to figure out difference of each lower side and for each lower side, Pearson correlation analysis was performed. Last, to understand effect between lower variables, multiple regression analysis was performed.
The summarized result of this study is as follows :
First, according to result of analyzing respondents' element tendency, among ego-resilience's variables, optimistic attitude was the highest and social support source and social support were generally supported family support. Last, emotional consume was the highest among psychological burnout variables.
Second, according to demographic variables, ego-resilience, social support and psychological burnout did not show large difference on lower variables. For ego-resilience lower variables, gender, certificate, age, career and major work did not show any difference. But, for lower variables of ego-resilience, confidence showed meaningful difference on marriage and academic ability. For personal relations, career showed meaningful difference.
For lower variables of social support, certificate, age, career, major work, academic ability, marriage did not show difference. But, gender showed meaningful difference on emotional support and evaluation support.
For lower variables of psychological burnout, gender, certificate, age, career, major work and academic career did not show any difference. But, for lower variables, emotional burnout, career doubt, negative attitude on youth activities, physical symptom showed meaningful difference on marriage and career doubt had meaningful difference on academic ability.
Third, optimistic attitude among variables of youth leader's ego-resilience affected to all lower variables of psychological burnout according to the result and confidence affected to negative attitude and negative personal relations of youth activities.
Fourth, among youth leader's social support sources, boss's support decreased emotional support and colleague's support decreased negative attitude and negative relations on youth activities. In social support criteria, informative support affected to decreased emotional burnout and evaluation support decreased career doubt of psychological burnout.
Fifth, according to result that ego-resilience and social support affect to psychological burnout, ego-resilience and social support had meaningful relationships negatively with psychological burnout. It means less psychological burnout will be experienced with higher ego-resilience and higher social support.
Key words: Youth leader, Ego-Resilience, Social Support, Psychological Burnout