RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중국 물권법상의 소유권 제한 = The ownership restrictions in the Chinese Property Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76447836

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The Chinese property law was established on March. 16th. 2007, and it was entered into force since October 1st. 2007. When those property laws were codified, the creation of ownership system parts came into a huge issue as a legal problem. Above all, based on the Chinese government system, which claims to stand for socialist market economy and aim at co-ownership system, the ownership on the Chinese property law is one of most cardinal system in china nowadays.
      The article 4 of the Chinese property law provides that one's property must be protected by legal principle. It shall not be infringed no matter what; nevertheless, when people compare between Korean legal principles and Chinese legal principle, several questions have been arisen, and how much personal ownership can be restricted in the socialist country, like China.
      As the matter of fact, the legal principles, that restricted the ownership on the Chinese property law, are simply divided into 5 categories.
      1. The first principle could be the prohibition of ownership restriction itself. Certain properties, which are owned by country or group, shall not be owned by one person. For instance, there are wide ranges of the ownership areas, such as real estates, wild animals, natural resources, and radio waves.
      2. Relationship between adjacent land owners could be the second principle. These restrictions are divided into four types, such as claim of use adjacent land, using Water right, the relationship with ventilation, lighting and sunshine, and damage on the real estate prevention. However, there is numerous institutional inertia contents' in those restriction areas.
      3. The restrictions by the expropriation and requisition are also the principle. Even though, it belongs to an administrative decree, China regulated those principles in the Chinese property law, duet their political system.
      4. There are restrictions on the expenditure as one principle that as an impact of existence of agricultural land protection political policy in China. China restricted the agriculturally and as the country's exclusive constructive land.
      5. Eventually, there are restrictions that are made by public interest as another principle. When the ownership are exercised, it shall not be originated that damage on the public interest.
      As a result of socialist market economy system, co-economy system has adopted, the conclusion should point out that the country, like Korea, which have the liberal market economy's ownership, assumes different aspects. The Chinese property law, which could not be exclude country's political situation, regulates the peculiar systems, when she compare with our real estates system even the principle of the ownership areas restriction.
      번역하기

      The Chinese property law was established on March. 16th. 2007, and it was entered into force since October 1st. 2007. When those property laws were codified, the creation of ownership system parts came into a huge issue as a legal problem. Above all, ...

      The Chinese property law was established on March. 16th. 2007, and it was entered into force since October 1st. 2007. When those property laws were codified, the creation of ownership system parts came into a huge issue as a legal problem. Above all, based on the Chinese government system, which claims to stand for socialist market economy and aim at co-ownership system, the ownership on the Chinese property law is one of most cardinal system in china nowadays.
      The article 4 of the Chinese property law provides that one's property must be protected by legal principle. It shall not be infringed no matter what; nevertheless, when people compare between Korean legal principles and Chinese legal principle, several questions have been arisen, and how much personal ownership can be restricted in the socialist country, like China.
      As the matter of fact, the legal principles, that restricted the ownership on the Chinese property law, are simply divided into 5 categories.
      1. The first principle could be the prohibition of ownership restriction itself. Certain properties, which are owned by country or group, shall not be owned by one person. For instance, there are wide ranges of the ownership areas, such as real estates, wild animals, natural resources, and radio waves.
      2. Relationship between adjacent land owners could be the second principle. These restrictions are divided into four types, such as claim of use adjacent land, using Water right, the relationship with ventilation, lighting and sunshine, and damage on the real estate prevention. However, there is numerous institutional inertia contents' in those restriction areas.
      3. The restrictions by the expropriation and requisition are also the principle. Even though, it belongs to an administrative decree, China regulated those principles in the Chinese property law, duet their political system.
      4. There are restrictions on the expenditure as one principle that as an impact of existence of agricultural land protection political policy in China. China restricted the agriculturally and as the country's exclusive constructive land.
      5. Eventually, there are restrictions that are made by public interest as another principle. When the ownership are exercised, it shall not be originated that damage on the public interest.
      As a result of socialist market economy system, co-economy system has adopted, the conclusion should point out that the country, like Korea, which have the liberal market economy's ownership, assumes different aspects. The Chinese property law, which could not be exclude country's political situation, regulates the peculiar systems, when she compare with our real estates system even the principle of the ownership areas restriction.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서
      • Ⅱ. 소유권의 내용
      • Ⅲ. 소유권 제한의 유형과 내용
      • Ⅳ. 결
      • 참고 문헌
      • Ⅰ. 서
      • Ⅱ. 소유권의 내용
      • Ⅲ. 소유권 제한의 유형과 내용
      • Ⅳ. 결
      • 참고 문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 費安玲, "不動産相隣關係與地役權若干問題的思考" 江蘇行政學院學報 2004

      2 갈운송, "중국 신 "물권법" 요람" 한국민사법학회 39 (39): 131-185, 2007

      3 이상욱, "중국 물권법상의 저당권 -저당권설정계약의 성립을 중심으로-" 한국토지법학회 24 (24): 53-76, 2008

      4 이상욱, "중국 물권법(초안) 상의 토지사용권" 한국토지법학회 (22) : 173-202, 2006

      5 王勝明, "華人民共和國 物權法解讀" 中國法制出版社 2007

      6 王利明, "物權法硏究 下卷(修訂版)" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

      7 王利明, "物權法硏究 上卷(修訂版" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

      8 韓松, "物權法所有權編" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

      9 全國人民代表大會常務委員會法制工作委員會民法室, "物權法 立法背景與觀點全集" 法律出版社 2007

      10 屈茂輝, "物權法 原理精要與實務指南" 人民法院出版社 2008

      1 費安玲, "不動産相隣關係與地役權若干問題的思考" 江蘇行政學院學報 2004

      2 갈운송, "중국 신 "물권법" 요람" 한국민사법학회 39 (39): 131-185, 2007

      3 이상욱, "중국 물권법상의 저당권 -저당권설정계약의 성립을 중심으로-" 한국토지법학회 24 (24): 53-76, 2008

      4 이상욱, "중국 물권법(초안) 상의 토지사용권" 한국토지법학회 (22) : 173-202, 2006

      5 王勝明, "華人民共和國 物權法解讀" 中國法制出版社 2007

      6 王利明, "物權法硏究 下卷(修訂版)" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

      7 王利明, "物權法硏究 上卷(修訂版" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

      8 韓松, "物權法所有權編" 中國人民大學出版社 2007

      9 全國人民代表大會常務委員會法制工作委員會民法室, "物權法 立法背景與觀點全集" 法律出版社 2007

      10 屈茂輝, "物權法 原理精要與實務指南" 人民法院出版社 2008

      11 何志, "物權法 判解硏究與適用" 人民法院出版社 2007

      12 梁慧星, "物權法" 法律出版社 2005

      13 陳華彬, "物權法" 法律出版社 2004

      14 江平, "民法學" 中國政法大學出版社 2007

      15 吳春岐, "抵押權" 中國法制出版社 2007

      16 丁海俊, "所有權" 中國法制出版社 2007

      17 王利明, "我國民法典重大疑難問題之硏究" 法律出版社 2006

      18 胡康生, "中華人民共和國物權法釋義" 法律出版社 2007

      19 吳高盛, "中華人民共和國物權法釋析" 人民法院出版社 2007

      20 郭明瑞, "中華人民共和國 物權法釋義" 中國法制出版社 2007

      21 孫憲忠, "中國當前物權立法中的十五大疑難問題" 民商法學 2006

      22 朱岩, "中國物權法評注" 北京大學出版社 2007

      23 劉智慧, "中國物權法解釋與應用" 人民法院出版社 2007

      24 江平, "中國物權法敎程(修訂版)" 知識産權出版社 2008

      25 王利明, "中國物權法敎程" 人民法院出版社 2007

      26 孫憲忠, "中國物權法制定に關する若干の問題(1)" 130 (130): 2004

      27 田中信行, "中國物權法を考える" 商事法務 2008

      28 近江幸治, "中國物權法における「所有權問題」" 77 (77): 2002

      29 劉智慧, "《物權法》立法觀念與疑難制度評注" 江蘇人民出版社 2007

      30 滕曉春, "《中華人民共和國物權法》釋義" 立信會計出版社 2007

      31 黃松有, "《中華人民共和國物權法》條文理解與適用" 人民法院出版社 2007

      32 王竹, "“《物權法(草案)》違憲風波”專題受記 --對“違憲風波”的學術觀察與評價"

      33 "http://www.fatianxia.com/paper_list.asp?id=6014"

      34 "http://www.civillaw.com.cn/article/default.asp?id=31715"

      35 "http://free.banzhu.com/y/yanglijun/prog/ShowDetail.asp?id=34"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Association For Korean Law Of Property -> THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-10-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE JOURNAL OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.89 0.89 0.74
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.71 0.86 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼