공동정범의 이론구성에 관한 비교법적 연구 = A comparative Legal Study on joint-principal theories

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Korean criminal law is composed of a system that separate principals and accomplices. Such a system has its own justification in terms of realizing a law-governed state and the principle of legality, compared to the single-principal system. However, the basis of justification seems unstable, in that the principal theorization, especially the joint-principal one, is mostly based on criminal-policy perspectives. Based precedents composed through the medium of the concept, ``conspiracy``, Theory of Joint-Principal through Conspiracy has led unnecessary and consumptive arguments while distorting the other joint-principal theories in the academic circles for a long time. Recently, however, a series of changes made in some precedents related to Theory of Joint-Principal through Conspiracy are providing us with a chance to reestablish a jointprincipal theory. Only when solving joint-principal cases with the concept, ``Conspiracy`` excluded from the joint-principal theory, we will be able to reestablish and develop this theory. Thus, embodying a standard of judgement for Theory of Functional Behavior Domination and applying it to this issue will be one of the most important assignments the academic circles of criminal law should complete at present. In fact, the Korean criminal law system separates principals and accomplices under the influence of ``Tatherrschaft`` (Theory of Crime Domination) from Germany, and Theory of Functional Behavior Domination works as a common theory for jointprincipals, but the reality of Theory of Joint-Principal through Conspiracy, established through Theory of Functional Behavior Domination, is not beyond its labeling, ``Fundamental Contribution``. In such a circumstance, it is necessary to attempt to solve these problems by newly highlighting the basic perspectives of joint-principal theories. Especially, this study found it necessary to refer to other methodologies used to solve joint-principal problems in the U. S. and U. K. with different criminal law systems, in addition to joint-principal theories from the German criminal law. Overall, this study made an attempt to seek a plan to solve joint-principal problems as a comparative research, while overcoming difficulties found in the theorization and application of joint-principal theories.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이승준, "형법해석을 둘러싼 의문에 관한 小考 -공모관계의 이탈에 관한 판례의 태도를 중심으로-" 법학연구소 26 (26): 433-456, 2015

2 안동준, "형법총론강의" 형설출판사 2009

3 김종구, "영미법상 공범체계와 공범종속성 원칙의 변천 - 우리 형법상 공범체계와 관련하여 -" 한국형사법학회 21 (21): 249-272, 2009

4 이정원, "소위 공모공동정범과 독일형법에서의 공동정범" (5) : 1993

5 최호진, "범행지배와 공동정범의 정범표지" 경북대학교 대학원 2003

6 서철원, "미국형법" 법원사 2005

7 최호진, "기능적 행위지배와 공모공동정범" 법학연구원 (32) : 631-655, 2010

8 류전철, "공범이론에서 ‘공모'(共謀)개념의 문제성" 한국형사법학회 26 (26): 3-25, 2014

9 백원기, "공모와 공동정범" 4 : 96-, 1996

10 김성룡, "공동정범의 주관적 구성요건요소" 3 (3): 2001

11 권영법, "공동정범의 구성요건과 본질적 기여에 대한 새로운 검토" 안암법학회 (44) : 165-212, 2014

12 이수진, "공동정범에서의 정범성립 요건 - ‘공모’공동정범과 관련하여 -" 법학연구소 56 (56): 141-158, 2015

13 Michael Jefferson, "criminal law" Pearson Longman 2007

14 Marcus Marlie, "Voraussetzungen der Mittäterschaft-Zur Fallbearbeitung in Klausur" 2006

15 Roxin, "Täterschaft und Tatherrschaft" Walter de Gruyter 2000

16 Phillip E. Johnson, "The Unnecessary Crime of Conspiracy" 61 : 1973

17 Andrew Ashworth, "Principles of Criminal Law" Oxford University Press 2006

18 Thomas J. Gardner, "Criminal Law" Thomson & Wadsworth 2003

19 Richard J. Bonnie, "Criminal Law" The Foundation Press, Inc 1997