주택재건축사업의 현황과 개선방안에 관한 연구 = (A) Study on the Current State of Housing Reconstruction Policy and Its Method of Improvement

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Reconstruction policy, in a word, refers to the policy to destroy antiquated or malfunctioning houses (which include ordinary houses, flats, and apartments). To be more precise, reconstruction policy takes place in such a way that the owner of an existing house independently forms a local housing cooperative and makes a partnership with a registered contractor in order to demolish the house and build a new one. Thus, reconstruction policy aims to provide new houses, improve residential environment, and facilitate the investment in real estate.
The apartment buildings, which had begun to be supplied since the late 1960s, became antiquated in terms of function and facilities in the course of subsequent 20 years, generating serious inconveniences to the residents. For this reason, reconstruction policy was implemented during the mid 1980s and stimulated public desire for replacing old houses with new ones, which, in turn, facilitated house reconstructions in urban areas. In the process, the government instituted the regulations regarding the standard of collective housing and the formation process of housing cooperative, which were needed to conduct reconstruction on the basis of the urban redevelopment law and the law on the development of housing construction. These legal measures served to establish a foothold on which the owners of antiquated or malfunctioning houses might improve their residential condition with recourse to reconstruction.
Afterwards, the residential atmosphere preservation law established in July, 2002, came to replace and abolish the urban redevelopment law. This new law was intended to secure the public interests of housing reconstruction by enlarging the scope of the policy and making the process transparent. However, the rise of the market price of the apartments in the capital area, which was actualized after the year 2002, made more stringent the regulations of housing reconstruction: as a result, what is called the reconstruction facilitation law operated to rather suppress the activities for reconstruction. Real estate recession operated as a determining factor to the regime change in 2008, and the new government is expected to spur reconstruction policy as a way to stimulate the national economy.
The present housing reconstruction policy as a way of boosting the national economy has other positive effects such as the improvement of residential environment, the increase in the amount of housing supply, the efficient use of land, and the creation of economic values. On the other hand, however, some members of housing cooperatives have set about indiscriminate reconstruction ventures for personal profits, which prompted speculations in real estate. Furthermore, the over-construction of urban intra facilities and the destruction of local environment have come out as undesirable side effects of reconstruction.
Recently, the government carried out the deregulation of housing reconstruction for two times: the deregulatory measures are called the August 21 and the November 3 measure, respectively. The ethos of the two deregulation policies lies in the slogan "the faster, higher, and more construction of apartments." The temporary prohibition of the transference of the membership in housing cooperative was also dissolved. In addition, the deregulation abolished the requirement of building compact flat and apartments for rent.
However, it is undeniable that such a sweeping deregulation may regenerate the profits of reconstruction under a range of conditions. Moreover, problems are prone to arise in the processes of instituting and facilitating the reconstruction policy, and in the compatibility of housing reconstruction with surrounding environment.
Therefore, it is desired for the government to seek changes in the reconstruction policy which fundamentally aims to improve housing and its surrounding environment by demolishing the old and bad housing.
The reconstruction policy from now on should take into consideration the local characteristics and harmony with environment, rather than focusing on profitability and the supply of housing.
Moreover, although reconstruction differs from redevelopment in terms of the goal, what most affects the reconstruction seems to be housing market conditions. So it should be considered that the recession and economic downturn across the society make adverse effects on the reconstruction policy even when the policy itself is well under progress.
Lastly, it is needed to employ the measure to control the market condition of housing reconstruction in response to the changes in housing market.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = 0
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구배경과 연구목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 대상 및 범위 = 2
• 제2장 재건축사업에 관한 이론적 고찰 = 4
• 제1절 재건축사업의 의의 = 4
• 1. 재건축사업의 개념 및 배경 = 4
• 2. 재건축사업의 필요성 = 6
• 3. 재건축사업의 기대 효과 = 7
• 1) 재건축사업의 긍정적 효과 = 8
• 2) 재건축사업의 부정적 효과 = 10
• 제2절 재건축사업의 절차 = 11
• 1. 결의 단계 = 11
• 2. 시행단계 = 14
• 3. 완료 단계 = 21
• 제3장 재건축사업의 현황과 문제점 = 26
• 제1절 재건축사업 추진 현황 = 26
• 제2절 수원시 재건축사업의 현황 = 29
• 1. 수원시의 재건축사업의 현황 = 29
• 2. 수원시 재건축사업 분석 = 30
• 3. 수원시 재건축사업의 개발 동향 = 31
• 4. 수원시 재건축·재개발 추진 현황 = 37
• 제3절 재건축사업의 문제점 = 38
• 1. 재건축사업의 정비 방식의 획일성 적용 = 38
• 2. 재건축사업의 조합운영 방식에서의 문제 = 41
• 3. 재건축으로 인한 자원낭비 = 43
• 4. 부정적 외부효과와 비용부담 = 46
• 5. 주택관리의 부실 = 47
• 6. 안전진단의 객관성 부족 = 49
• 7. 투기와 주택시장 왜곡 = 50
• 8. 재건축을 둘러싼 사회적 갈등 = 53
• 9. 도시경관 악화 = 55
• 제4장 재건축사업(아파트)의 개선 방안 = 56
• 1. 재건축사업 (국민주택, 재건축아파트) 기금 지원 확대 = 56
• 2. 재건축사업의 기금 조성 = 57
• 3. 재개발사업기금 활용 = 57
• 4. 전문 관리자의 역할 강화와 제도개선 = 58
• 5. 도시재개발법과 통합하여 도시 계획적 측면 강화 = 58
• 6. 재건축사업 관련 규제 개선 = 60
• 1) 임대주택의무 비율제 개정 = 60
• 2) 재건축 후분양제 개선 = 61
• 3) 기반시설부담금 완화 = 61
• 4) 소형주택의무비율 완화 = 62
• 7. 종합적인 주거환경평가 = 63
• 8. 공공참여의 확대 = 65
• 9. 사회적 갈등 완화와 세입자 보호 = 65
• 제5장 결론 = 67
• 참고 문헌 = 69
• ABSTRACT = 71