This study aims to expand our understanding of Lockean liberalism while examining the key points of the interpretation that connects it to colonialism and eurocentrism. As a member of the anti-monarchists, Locke was deeply involved in the 17th century...
This study aims to expand our understanding of Lockean liberalism while examining the key points of the interpretation that connects it to colonialism and eurocentrism. As a member of the anti-monarchists, Locke was deeply involved in the 17th century political conflict in England and the resulting Glorious Revolution. Furthermore, he also worked on then-English Empire’s colonial policies for America himself as legislator and official for a significant amount of time. In spite of this, Two Treaties of Government has mostly been studied in the context of England’s own politics, and thinking about the context of colonialism and eurocentrism presented in Two Treaties has been relatively rare. This study traces the eurocentric biases in Two Treaties identified by several precedent studies, while examining what the mentions of America and Native American Indians mean for Locke’s political thought and how they convey the characteristics of Lockean liberalism. In doing so, this study will point out the merits and demerits of the studies that read Two Treaties in the colonial context, and assess the implications of eurocentrism that Locke’s polical thought connotes. Through this, this study will contemplate on the insights that Locke’s political thought provides for our understanding of liberalism today.