RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Appraising the Interface Features of Web Search Engines Based on User-defined Relevance Criteria

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104907711

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Although research has shown a significant amount of work identifying various dimensions of relevance along with exhaustive lists of relevance criteria, there seem to have been less effort to apply the findings to improve actual systems design. Based on this assumption, this paper investigates to what extent those relevance criteria have been incorporated into the interface features of major commercial Web search engines, suggesting what can/should be done more. Before stepping into the actual system features, this paper compares recent relevance research in Information Science with other human factor studies both in Information Science and its neighboring discipline (HCI), as an attempt to identify studies that are conceptually similar to the relevance research, but not named as such way. Similarities and differences between these studies are presented. Recommendations suggested to support applicable interface features include: 1) further personalization of interface designs; 2) author-supplied meta tags for the Web contents; and 3) extensions of beyond-topical representations based on link structure.
      번역하기

      Although research has shown a significant amount of work identifying various dimensions of relevance along with exhaustive lists of relevance criteria, there seem to have been less effort to apply the findings to improve actual systems design. Based o...

      Although research has shown a significant amount of work identifying various dimensions of relevance along with exhaustive lists of relevance criteria, there seem to have been less effort to apply the findings to improve actual systems design. Based on this assumption, this paper investigates to what extent those relevance criteria have been incorporated into the interface features of major commercial Web search engines, suggesting what can/should be done more. Before stepping into the actual system features, this paper compares recent relevance research in Information Science with other human factor studies both in Information Science and its neighboring discipline (HCI), as an attempt to identify studies that are conceptually similar to the relevance research, but not named as such way. Similarities and differences between these studies are presented. Recommendations suggested to support applicable interface features include: 1) further personalization of interface designs; 2) author-supplied meta tags for the Web contents; and 3) extensions of beyond-topical representations based on link structure.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Nielsen, J, "bility Engineering" Academic Press 1993

      2 Weinberg, B. H, "Why indexing fails the researcher" 16 (16): 3-6, 1988

      3 Schamber, L, "User’s criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations" Syracuse University, Syracuse 1991

      4 Barry, C, "User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study" 45 (45): 149-159, 1994

      5 Savolainen, R, "User-defined relevance criteria in web searching" 62 : 685-707, 2005

      6 Fidel, R, "User-centered indexing" 45 (45): 572-576, 1994

      7 Saracevic, T, "The stratified model of information retrieval interaction: extension and applications" 34 : 313-327, 1997

      8 Park, T, "The nature of relevance in information retrieval: an empirical study" 63 (63): 318-351, 1993

      9 Brin, S, Page, L., "The Anatomy of a largeschale hypertextual Web search engine"

      10 Shneiderman, B, "Software psychology: Human factors in computer and information systems" Winthrop Publishers, Inc 1980

      1 Nielsen, J, "bility Engineering" Academic Press 1993

      2 Weinberg, B. H, "Why indexing fails the researcher" 16 (16): 3-6, 1988

      3 Schamber, L, "User’s criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations" Syracuse University, Syracuse 1991

      4 Barry, C, "User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study" 45 (45): 149-159, 1994

      5 Savolainen, R, "User-defined relevance criteria in web searching" 62 : 685-707, 2005

      6 Fidel, R, "User-centered indexing" 45 (45): 572-576, 1994

      7 Saracevic, T, "The stratified model of information retrieval interaction: extension and applications" 34 : 313-327, 1997

      8 Park, T, "The nature of relevance in information retrieval: an empirical study" 63 (63): 318-351, 1993

      9 Brin, S, Page, L., "The Anatomy of a largeschale hypertextual Web search engine"

      10 Shneiderman, B, "Software psychology: Human factors in computer and information systems" Winthrop Publishers, Inc 1980

      11 Sullivan, D, "Search engine watch"

      12 Froehlich, T.J, "Relevance reconsidered―Towards an agenda for the 21st century:Introduction to special topic issue on relevance research" 45 (45): 124-134, 1994

      13 Park, H, "Relevance of science information:origins and dimensions of relevance and their implications to information retrieval" 33 (33): 339-352, 1997

      14 Schamber, L, "Relevance and information behavior" 29 : 3-48, 1994

      15 Saracevic, T, "RELEVANCE reconsidered In Information Science: Integration in Perspectives" The Royal School of Librarianship 201-218, 1996

      16 Harter, S, "Psychological Relevance and Information Science" 43 (43): 602-615, 1992

      17 Soergel, D, "Organizing Information: Principles of database and retrieval systems" Academic Press 1985

      18 Cuadra, C, "Opening the black box of “Relevance.”" 23 (23): 291-303, 1967

      19 Lin, S, "Modeling multiple information seeking episodes" 37 : 133-147, 2000

      20 Saracevic, T, "Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR): a review and proposal" 3-9, 1996

      21 Marchionini, G, "Interfaces and tools for the Library of Congress National Digital Library Program" 34 (34): 535-555, 1998

      22 Belkin, N, "Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior In Information retrieval" Universitaetsverlag 1993

      23 Marchionini, G, "Information seeking in electronic environments" Cambridge University Press 1995

      24 Ingwersen, P, "Information retrieval interaction" Taylor Graham 1992

      25 Dervin, B, "Information needs and uses" 21 : 3-33, 1986

      26 Saracevic, T, "Information Science" 50 (50): 1051-1063, 1999

      27 Rieh, S.Y, "Information Quality and cognitive authority in the World Wide Web" Rutgers University, New Jersey 2000

      28 Shackel, B, "Human-Computer Interaction - Whence and Whither" 48 (48): 970-986, 1997

      29 Taylor, A, "Examination of Relevance Criteria Choices and the Information Search Process" 65 (65): 719-744, 2009

      30 Hix, D, "Developing user inter faces: Ensuring usability thorough produce & process" John Wiley & Sons 1993

      31 Shneiderman, B, "Designing the user interface:Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed.)" Addison-Wesley 1998

      32 Marchionini, G, "Design of interfaces for information seeking" 33 : 89-130, 1998

      33 Shneiderman, B, "Clarifying search: a user-interface framework for text searches" 1997

      34 Cool, C, "Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judgements" Learned Information 77-84, 1993

      35 Booth, P, "An Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction" LEA 1989

      36 Schamber, L, "A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition" 26 (26): 755-776, 1990

      37 Wang, P, "A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study 1. Document selection" 49 (49): 115-133, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-08-08 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국비블리아 -> 한국비블리아학회지 KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.5 0.5 0.61
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.58 0.62 0.913 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼