RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Notes on Extraction from Missing CPs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108058725

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is noted that scrambling is impossible from argument ellipsis sites. This supports the claim that argument ellipsis does not have a full-fledged structure and that it involves pro. Pro analyses of missing arguments are in line with Hankamer and Sag’s (1976) main idea on deep anaphora. Deep anaphoras do not have internal structures. Whether anaphora sites involve internal structures has been debated for a long time. Recently, Sakamoto (2017) and Takahashi (2020) suggest that there are cleft examples showing that extraction seems to be possible from argument ellipsis sites. This squib examines whether the cleft examples in Korean involve movement from argument ellipsis sites. We suggest that the clefting examples in Korean pointed out by Sakamoto (2017) don’t involve movement from a hidden clause structure and that an LF copying strategy is not needed to account for the interpretation of the examples. We note that an adjunct reading construed with an embedded predicate is absent in Korean adjunct clefting. We suggest that the absence of such an interpretation indicates that LF copying does not occur in argument ellipsis sites.
      번역하기

      It is noted that scrambling is impossible from argument ellipsis sites. This supports the claim that argument ellipsis does not have a full-fledged structure and that it involves pro. Pro analyses of missing arguments are in line with Hankamer and Sag...

      It is noted that scrambling is impossible from argument ellipsis sites. This supports the claim that argument ellipsis does not have a full-fledged structure and that it involves pro. Pro analyses of missing arguments are in line with Hankamer and Sag’s (1976) main idea on deep anaphora. Deep anaphoras do not have internal structures. Whether anaphora sites involve internal structures has been debated for a long time. Recently, Sakamoto (2017) and Takahashi (2020) suggest that there are cleft examples showing that extraction seems to be possible from argument ellipsis sites. This squib examines whether the cleft examples in Korean involve movement from argument ellipsis sites. We suggest that the clefting examples in Korean pointed out by Sakamoto (2017) don’t involve movement from a hidden clause structure and that an LF copying strategy is not needed to account for the interpretation of the examples. We note that an adjunct reading construed with an embedded predicate is absent in Korean adjunct clefting. We suggest that the absence of such an interpretation indicates that LF copying does not occur in argument ellipsis sites.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 문귀선, "영논항의 속성 재조명" 대한언어학회 18 (18): 67-92, 2010

      2 안희돈 ; 조성은, "영논항의 대명사 분석에 대한 재고찰" 한국언어정보학회 24 (24): 1-13, 2020

      3 안희돈 ; 조성은, "영논항의 pro(영대명사) 분석 재고" 언어연구소 (86) : 85-112, 2019

      4 이우승, "Zero Realization of Arguments Revisited" 한국언어학회 36 (36): 1031-1052, 2011

      5 Hoji, Hajime, "Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax" University of Southern California 1990

      6 Pustejovsky, James, "The Generative Lexicon" MIT Press 1995

      7 Jackendoff, Ray, "The Architecture of the Language Faculty" MIT Press 1997

      8 Hiraiwa, Ken, "Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese" 15 : 142-180, 2012

      9 Kang, Bosook, "Some peculiarities of Korean kes cleft constructions" 60 : 251-281, 2006

      10 Ahn, Hee-Don, "Some ellipsis phenomena in Korean" Hankuk Publishing Co 3-38, 2012

      1 문귀선, "영논항의 속성 재조명" 대한언어학회 18 (18): 67-92, 2010

      2 안희돈 ; 조성은, "영논항의 대명사 분석에 대한 재고찰" 한국언어정보학회 24 (24): 1-13, 2020

      3 안희돈 ; 조성은, "영논항의 pro(영대명사) 분석 재고" 언어연구소 (86) : 85-112, 2019

      4 이우승, "Zero Realization of Arguments Revisited" 한국언어학회 36 (36): 1031-1052, 2011

      5 Hoji, Hajime, "Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax" University of Southern California 1990

      6 Pustejovsky, James, "The Generative Lexicon" MIT Press 1995

      7 Jackendoff, Ray, "The Architecture of the Language Faculty" MIT Press 1997

      8 Hiraiwa, Ken, "Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese" 15 : 142-180, 2012

      9 Kang, Bosook, "Some peculiarities of Korean kes cleft constructions" 60 : 251-281, 2006

      10 Ahn, Hee-Don, "Some ellipsis phenomena in Korean" Hankuk Publishing Co 3-38, 2012

      11 박명관, "Some Remarks on the Licensing Condition on the Null Argument in Korean (and Japanese)" 한국생성문법학회 24 (24): 499-514, 2014

      12 Sohn, Keun-Won, "Operator movement and cleft conditions" 2000

      13 문귀선, "On the Validity of the Skolemized Choice Function Approach to Small pro Anaphora in Korean" 한국생성문법학회 29 (29): 413-439, 2019

      14 안희돈 ; 조성은, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean" 한국언어학회 34 (34): 267-281, 2009

      15 안희돈 ; 조성은, "On Sloppy-like Interpretation of Null Arguments" 언어정보연구소 28 (28): 471-492, 2011

      16 안희돈 ; 조성은, "On Null Arguments and Clausal Ellipsis in Korean" 언어연구소 (57) : 95-124, 2012

      17 안희돈 ; 조성은, "On Apparent Problems of Pro Analysis of Null Argument" 한국생성문법학회 23 (23): 511-526, 2013

      18 Hoji, Hajime, "Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese" 29 : 127-152, 1998

      19 Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis" 언어교육원 43 (43): 203-227, 2007

      20 안희돈 ; 조성은, "Notes on Apparent DP Ellipsis: A Reply to Lee & Kim (2010)" 한국언어학회 36 (36): 457-471, 2011

      21 안희돈 ; 조성은, "More on the Absence of CP Ellipsis: A Reply to Park (2009)" 한국생성문법학회 20 (20): 137-148, 2010

      22 Jhang, Sea-Eun, "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts and comparatives" Simon Fraser University 1994

      23 Saito, Mamoru, "Handbook of Japanese Syntax" De Gruyter Mouton 701-750, 2017

      24 Sakamoto, Yuta, "Escape from silent syntax" University of Connecticut 2017

      25 Takahashi, Daiko, "Derivational argument ellipsis" 37 : 47-74, 2020

      26 손근원, "Deep/Surface Anaphors in Korean and Implications Thereof" 한국현대언어학회 30 (30): 905-926, 2015

      27 Hankamer, Jorge, "Deep and surface anaphora" 7 : 391-428, 1976

      28 이우승 ; 김지현, "DP Ellipsis as Independent Phenomena from pro in pro-drop Languages" 한국언어학회 35 (35): 1009-1029, 2010

      29 Grimshaw, Jane, "Complement selection and the lexicon" 10 : 279-326, 1979

      30 문귀선, "Co-varying Pronominal Anaphors: Focusing on Bound Variable Pronouns" 한국생성문법학회 27 (27): 221-240, 2017

      31 이우승, "Argumental Gaps in Korean" 대한언어학회 22 (22): 1-29, 2014

      32 이우승, "Argument ellipsis vs. V-stranding VP ellipsis in Korean: Evidence from disjunction" 언어정보연구소 33 (33): 1-20, 2016

      33 손근원, "Apparent CP Deletion and DP Relatedness" 언어정보연구소 29 (29): 107-126, 2012

      34 이우승, "Adjunct Ellipsis in Korean" 한국생성문법학회 29 (29): 669-687, 2019

      35 Park, Myung-Kwan, "A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection" University of Connecticut 1994

      36 손근원, "A base generation approach to kulehkey construction leaving remnants" 한국현대언어학회 34 (34): 661-671, 2019

      37 문귀선, "A Non-isomorphism Approach to Null-Argument Anaphora in Korean" 한국생성문법학회 25 (25): 217-236, 2015

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2005-02-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.48 1.439 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼