RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    地籍測量業務 管轄에 대한 憲法訴願審判請求事件 = The Constitutional Complaint in Connection with the Jurisdiction of Cadastral Surveying Business

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104971023

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The cadastral law was reformed and taken effect on the 1st of January 2004. As a result, the cadastral surveying system which has been monopolistically performed by Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation(hereinafter referred as to “KCSC”) for about 30 years was unavoidablly changed. In other words, any agencies which has qualification for cadastral surveying are able to carry it out since reformation of law.However, some surveying agencies are still discontented with the reformed provision because their sphere of activity is limited. While KCSC can do that without any limitation, they should survey in the area in which a boundary coordinate register has already been established. Therefore, some surveying corporations are insisting that it is an invasion of constitutional rights(especially, an equal right and freedom of choice of occupation).It involves consideration from legal aspect and this paper aims to examine a matter closely. For this, we deals with the legal position of cadastral surveying corporation and organization and inquires into primary issue of law.Most of all, the articles and clauses which will be intensively reviewed in this study is the Cadastral Law §41-3; Cadastral surveying agencies can be in charge of the following cadastral surveys; (1) The cadastral survey in the area which a boundary coordinate register has already been established. (2) cadastral determinate survey which is implemented to enter the boundary points in the boundary coordinate register after the land development.
    번역하기

    The cadastral law was reformed and taken effect on the 1st of January 2004. As a result, the cadastral surveying system which has been monopolistically performed by Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation(hereinafter referred as to “KCSC”) for about 30...

    The cadastral law was reformed and taken effect on the 1st of January 2004. As a result, the cadastral surveying system which has been monopolistically performed by Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation(hereinafter referred as to “KCSC”) for about 30 years was unavoidablly changed. In other words, any agencies which has qualification for cadastral surveying are able to carry it out since reformation of law.However, some surveying agencies are still discontented with the reformed provision because their sphere of activity is limited. While KCSC can do that without any limitation, they should survey in the area in which a boundary coordinate register has already been established. Therefore, some surveying corporations are insisting that it is an invasion of constitutional rights(especially, an equal right and freedom of choice of occupation).It involves consideration from legal aspect and this paper aims to examine a matter closely. For this, we deals with the legal position of cadastral surveying corporation and organization and inquires into primary issue of law.Most of all, the articles and clauses which will be intensively reviewed in this study is the Cadastral Law §41-3; Cadastral surveying agencies can be in charge of the following cadastral surveys; (1) The cadastral survey in the area which a boundary coordinate register has already been established. (2) cadastral determinate survey which is implemented to enter the boundary points in the boundary coordinate register after the land development.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박순표, "한국의 지적제도" (6) : 1985

    2 이관희, "한국민주헌법론Ⅰ" 박영사 2004

    3 한수웅, "평등권의 구조와 심사기준" 9집 1998

    4 김명식, "특수법인의 법적 지위와 법률관계" 2001.10

    5 방승주, "직업선택의 자유 -헌법재판소의 지난 10년간의 판례를 중심으로-" 9집 : 1998

    6 한국법제연구원, "지적측량 대행제도 관련 법령 연구" 한국법제연구원 2003

    7 이현준, "지적제도에 관한 공법적 검토" 2006

    8 석종현, "일반행정법(상)" 삼영사 2005

    9 Barry F. Kavanagh, "Surveying Principles and Applications" Surveying Principles and Applications Prentice-Hall 1992

    10 Walter G. Robillard, "Brown's Boundary Control and Legal Principles" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2003

    1 박순표, "한국의 지적제도" (6) : 1985

    2 이관희, "한국민주헌법론Ⅰ" 박영사 2004

    3 한수웅, "평등권의 구조와 심사기준" 9집 1998

    4 김명식, "특수법인의 법적 지위와 법률관계" 2001.10

    5 방승주, "직업선택의 자유 -헌법재판소의 지난 10년간의 판례를 중심으로-" 9집 : 1998

    6 한국법제연구원, "지적측량 대행제도 관련 법령 연구" 한국법제연구원 2003

    7 이현준, "지적제도에 관한 공법적 검토" 2006

    8 석종현, "일반행정법(상)" 삼영사 2005

    9 Barry F. Kavanagh, "Surveying Principles and Applications" Surveying Principles and Applications Prentice-Hall 1992

    10 Walter G. Robillard, "Brown's Boundary Control and Legal Principles" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.69 0.687 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼