RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정보공개청구권과 저작권의 상충 : 미국의 논의 = The Conflict of the Freedom of Information and Copyright : A Discussion in the U.S.A.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104722914

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This is a study on the conflict of the freedom of information and copyright. An outline of this study is as follows :
    The Freedom of Information Act(FOIA) of Korea emphasizes official agency disclosure through access to official information. However the Copyright Act of Korea emphasizes protection the expression of idea unauthorized exploitation.
    If someone requests a copyrighted official information disclosure under FOIA of Korea, what should the official agency do? The FOIA of Korea restricts the right of information disclosure request under FOIA of Korea exemption clause, Clause (1) of Article 9. The existence of a copyright does automatically render FOIA exemption information? Is the Copyright Act exemption statue of Exemption 1? Is copyrighted information a trade secret of Exemption 7? These are not obvious.
    This article analyzes a discussion of U.S.A. about this issue, suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.
    Chapter two reviews the FOIA of U.S.A. and the Copyright Act of U.S.A. Chapter three analyzes the Weisberg decision which is the most famous on holding this issue, and chapter four suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.
    번역하기

    This is a study on the conflict of the freedom of information and copyright. An outline of this study is as follows : The Freedom of Information Act(FOIA) of Korea emphasizes official agency disclosure through access to official information. However ...

    This is a study on the conflict of the freedom of information and copyright. An outline of this study is as follows :
    The Freedom of Information Act(FOIA) of Korea emphasizes official agency disclosure through access to official information. However the Copyright Act of Korea emphasizes protection the expression of idea unauthorized exploitation.
    If someone requests a copyrighted official information disclosure under FOIA of Korea, what should the official agency do? The FOIA of Korea restricts the right of information disclosure request under FOIA of Korea exemption clause, Clause (1) of Article 9. The existence of a copyright does automatically render FOIA exemption information? Is the Copyright Act exemption statue of Exemption 1? Is copyrighted information a trade secret of Exemption 7? These are not obvious.
    This article analyzes a discussion of U.S.A. about this issue, suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.
    Chapter two reviews the FOIA of U.S.A. and the Copyright Act of U.S.A. Chapter three analyzes the Weisberg decision which is the most famous on holding this issue, and chapter four suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This is a study on the conflict of the freedom of information and copyright. An outline of this study is as follows :
    The Freedom of Information Act(FOIA) of Korea emphasizes official agency disclosure through access to official information. However the Copyright Act of Korea emphasizes protection the expression of idea unauthorized exploitation.
    If someone requests a copyrighted official information disclosure under FOIA of Korea, what should the official agency do? The FOIA of Korea restricts the right of information disclosure request under FOIA of Korea exemption clause, Clause (1) of Article 9. The existence of a copyright does automatically render FOIA exemption information? Is the Copyright Act exemption statue of Exemption 1? Is copyrighted information a trade secret of Exemption 7? These are not obvious.
    This article analyzes a discussion of U.S.A. about this issue, suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.
    Chapter two reviews the FOIA of U.S.A. and the Copyright Act of U.S.A. Chapter three analyzes the Weisberg decision which is the most famous on holding this issue, and chapter four suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.
    번역하기

    This is a study on the conflict of the freedom of information and copyright. An outline of this study is as follows : The Freedom of Information Act(FOIA) of Korea emphasizes official agency disclosure through access to official information. However...

    This is a study on the conflict of the freedom of information and copyright. An outline of this study is as follows :
    The Freedom of Information Act(FOIA) of Korea emphasizes official agency disclosure through access to official information. However the Copyright Act of Korea emphasizes protection the expression of idea unauthorized exploitation.
    If someone requests a copyrighted official information disclosure under FOIA of Korea, what should the official agency do? The FOIA of Korea restricts the right of information disclosure request under FOIA of Korea exemption clause, Clause (1) of Article 9. The existence of a copyright does automatically render FOIA exemption information? Is the Copyright Act exemption statue of Exemption 1? Is copyrighted information a trade secret of Exemption 7? These are not obvious.
    This article analyzes a discussion of U.S.A. about this issue, suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.
    Chapter two reviews the FOIA of U.S.A. and the Copyright Act of U.S.A. Chapter three analyzes the Weisberg decision which is the most famous on holding this issue, and chapter four suggests what a discussion of U.S.A. gives us.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 배대헌, "현행 저작권법상 저작인격권의 법리에 관한 검토" 한국산업재산권법학회 (21) : 147-192, 2006

    2 정필운, "정보사회에서 지적재산의 보호와 이용에 관한 헌법학적 연구-저작물을 중심으로" 연세대학교 대학원 2009

    3 박성호, "정보공개제도와 저작권법의 관계 in: 저작권법의 이론과 현실" 현암사 2006

    4 김배원, "정보공개제도와 기업비밀*- 미국의 FOIA 예외조항 4의 판례를 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 5 (5): 181-214, 2004

    5 경건, "정보공개의 새로운 지향-전자정보공개제도를 중심으로" 한국기록학회 (5호) : 111-148, 2002

    6 경
건, "미국 정보공개법제의 개관" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 15 (15): 2007

    7 임원선, "미국 저작권법(2000)" 저작권심의조정위원회 2000

    8 "http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_IV_4/page3.htm"

    9 "http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/Executive/EOP.shtml"

    10 Gellman, Robert M, "Twin Evils: Government Copyright and Copyright-like Controls over Government Information" 45 : 999-, 1994

    1 배대헌, "현행 저작권법상 저작인격권의 법리에 관한 검토" 한국산업재산권법학회 (21) : 147-192, 2006

    2 정필운, "정보사회에서 지적재산의 보호와 이용에 관한 헌법학적 연구-저작물을 중심으로" 연세대학교 대학원 2009

    3 박성호, "정보공개제도와 저작권법의 관계 in: 저작권법의 이론과 현실" 현암사 2006

    4 김배원, "정보공개제도와 기업비밀*- 미국의 FOIA 예외조항 4의 판례를 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 5 (5): 181-214, 2004

    5 경건, "정보공개의 새로운 지향-전자정보공개제도를 중심으로" 한국기록학회 (5호) : 111-148, 2002

    6 경
건, "미국 정보공개법제의 개관" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 15 (15): 2007

    7 임원선, "미국 저작권법(2000)" 저작권심의조정위원회 2000

    8 "http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_IV_4/page3.htm"

    9 "http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/Executive/EOP.shtml"

    10 Gellman, Robert M, "Twin Evils: Government Copyright and Copyright-like Controls over Government Information" 45 : 999-, 1994

    11 Walterscheid, Edwin C, "To Promote the Progress of Science and Useful Arts: The Background and Origin of the Intellectual Property Clause fo the United States Constitution" 2 : 1-, 1994

    12 Roy Seth Gordet, "The Disclosure and Reproduction of Copyrighted Agency Records Under the Freedom of Information Act" 22 : 513-,

    13 Rabinowitz, Renee G, "The Applicability of the Freedom of Information Act’s Disclosure Requirements to Intellectual Property" 57 : 561-, 1981

    14 Nimmer, Meville B, "Nimmer on Copyright" Matthew Bender & Company, Inc 2004

    15 Hammitt,Harry A, "Litigation Under the Federal Open Government Laws 2008" EPIC Publications 2009

    16 Barrett, Margreth, "Intellectual Property: Cases and Matericals" West Group 2001

    17 Merges, Robert P, "Intellectual Property in the Mew Technological Age" Aspen 2003

    18 Tomkies,Suzanne E, "Balancing Copyright Protection with Disclosure Under the Freedom of Information Act" 15 : 71-, 1993

    19 Hansmann, Henry, "A Comparative Legal and Economical Analysis in : Intellectual Property Rights : Critical Concepts in Law, Vol.Ⅱ" Routledge 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.17
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.05 0.94 1.239 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼