RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      작도법에 따른 연조직 분석에 관한 비교연구 = A Comparative Study on the Soft Tissue Analysis According to the Drawng Method

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19567441

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The construction of angles is needed for soft tissue analysis and the angles can be made by drawing lines connecting anatomic points or tangent lines. The purpose of the present study is to compare the two drawing methods and show the difference betwe...

      The construction of angles is needed for soft tissue analysis and the angles can be made by drawing lines connecting anatomic points or tangent lines. The purpose of the present study is to compare the two drawing methods and show the difference between them. Soft tissue outlines were traced in the lateral cephalograms of 40 normal occlusion individuals, 20 males and 20 females. On the traced cephalograms, angles were constructed by means of both drawing methods. The procedure was repeated twice in a two-week period by the same investigator, and then performed once more by another. In each procedure, angular forms of profile was digitized and 10 angular measurements were computed. The two sets of measurement by the first investigator was compared to study differences due to the interval between drawings, while the two sets of measurement by the two investigators were compared to show any differences resulting from the drawers. The obtained results were as follows:
      1. The comparison of the measurements between the anatomic point and tangent line group showed a statistically significant difference in nine of ten measurements.
      2. The comparison for the reproducibility through correlation analysis showed a high reproducibility in both the anatomic point group and tangent line group.
      3. In the analysis of the measurement difference according to the drawing time, two measurements showed significant difference in the anatomic point group and four measurements represented significant difference in the tangent line group.
      4. In the analysis of the measurement difference according to the drawers, five measurements showed significant difference in the anatomic point group and six measurements represented significant difference in the tangent line group.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법
      • Ⅲ. 연구성적
      • Ⅳ. 총괄 및 고찰
      • Ⅴ. 결 론
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법
      • Ⅲ. 연구성적
      • Ⅳ. 총괄 및 고찰
      • Ⅴ. 결 론
      • 참고문헌
      • 영문초록
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼