공적(公的)관리에서의 참여형 관개관리(PIM) 모델 = A Study on the Participatory Irrigation Management under Public Irrigation Management System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There was a transition from participatory irrigation management (PIM) to public irrigation management (PubIM) in Korea when Korea Rural corporation and Community (KRC) merged with Farm Land Improvement Associations (FLIAs), which had managed 60 % of irrigation areas. While making a number of achievements, some problems occurred in the public irrigation management, such as lack of farmers' participation, increased amount of water usage, and elevating operating costs. Accordingly, this paper suggested ways to increase efficiency in water usage and reduce operating costs under the public management through the motive power of farmers participation. First, WUGs replaced the discarded water management committee should be reorganized to revive the concept of PIM in the form of autonomously reinforced one and the roles and functions of WUGs and the board of representatives should be strengthened. The member of new type of WUGs should participate in the national and regional water management committees as a stakeholder of irrigation water user. And also new type of WUGs initiates not only the management of irrigation water but also the management of irrigation water quality and non-point source pollution in the watersheds. Those additional activities of WUGs should be properly compensated. Second, subsidies (direct payments) should be provided to faithful farmers as an incentive for their labor supply. Third, water fees could be charged to large scale agriculture companies. Fourth, professional managers could be hired, management targets would be adjusted, and incentives should be offered. These efforts are expected to improve the irrigation management by encouraging farmers' participation under public system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Kim, T. C, "The level of charge for agriculture water management fee" 2009

2 Korea Agriculture and Rural Infrastructure Corporation, "Survey for Self-governing district satisfactory research"

3 Korea Rural Community Corporation, "Survey for Irrigation facility improvement method plan"

4 Kim, T. C, "Study on the Principle of Cost Recovery for Agricultural Water" 2010

5 Korea Rural Community Corporation, "Strategies of Korea for Agricultural Water Policies of OECD"

6 Satoh, "Principles and methods for PIM and role sharing between government and farmers" 2007

7 Korea Agriculture and Rural Infrastructure Corporation, "Predicted Changes of the Major Policy on the Irrigation Water Management and its Countermeasures"

8 Kono, "Participatory system for successful water management in the TOYOGAWA irrigation project Japan" 2007

9 Peter, "Participatory Irrigation Management"

10 김관보, "New Institutional Arrangement for the Self-Governance of Korean Irrigation Systems" 서울행정학회 17 (17): 239-278, 2006

11 Satoh, "Necessity and methods for participatory irrigation management" 2010

12 Carlos, G, "Irrigation management transfer" 3-6, 2007

13 FAO, "Guidelines for Participatory Training and extension in Farmers' water management"

14 Ostrom, "Governing the commons"

15 Abernethy, "Governance of irrigation system : Does history offer lesson for today" 59 (59): 31-40, 2010

16 Kim, T. C., "An Impact of Public Irrigation Management Systems of Korea" 2010

17 Kim, T. C, "A Study on the Participatory Irrigation Management under the Public System" 2010