RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Undercover 및 Confidential Informant 制度導入에 관한 憲法的 考察 = A Study on Legislation of Criminal Investigation by Undercover and Confidential Informant with Constitutionality

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76450834

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recent crimes show a tendency not only to increase in quantity but to be complex in quality. It becomes more difficult to apprehend crime itself, collect evidence and arrest criminal because the character of the crimes is consensual, victimless and invisible. Here comes the necessity of tricky and undercover method so called entrapment investigation. And most investigation agencies of many countries use this method nowadays. In spite of usefulness of the method, there are problems that the method has possibility to conflict with the principle of guarantee of human rights and due process of law which is supported by constitutional law. Thus undercover, confidential informant and entrapment investigation stands between two conflicting values, defense of society and guarantee of human rights, and both full control and unlimited permission are not desirable. Now how can we find out the harmonious point of these two values?
    The idea of due process of law in Constitution made criminal procedure, the Bill of Rights become a "living document". The newly established Korean Constitutional Court and the Korean Supreme Court have made important decisions for such rights. However, there still remain a number of problems such as undercover and confidential informant investigation which could disturb the trim in the Constitution and overshadow the constitutional procedural rights. But in Korea the necessity of undercover and confidential informant isn't deniable like in other countries. Thus the important point is the control of undercover and confidential informant and the way of control of those must be made in accordance with due process of law in Constitution.
    So, we have to study due process of law and other principal of guarantee of human rights concerning undercover and confidential informant. And then, it will be necessary that we apply those to the legislation for criminal investigation by undercover and confidential informant with constitutionality.
    번역하기

    Recent crimes show a tendency not only to increase in quantity but to be complex in quality. It becomes more difficult to apprehend crime itself, collect evidence and arrest criminal because the character of the crimes is consensual, victimless and in...

    Recent crimes show a tendency not only to increase in quantity but to be complex in quality. It becomes more difficult to apprehend crime itself, collect evidence and arrest criminal because the character of the crimes is consensual, victimless and invisible. Here comes the necessity of tricky and undercover method so called entrapment investigation. And most investigation agencies of many countries use this method nowadays. In spite of usefulness of the method, there are problems that the method has possibility to conflict with the principle of guarantee of human rights and due process of law which is supported by constitutional law. Thus undercover, confidential informant and entrapment investigation stands between two conflicting values, defense of society and guarantee of human rights, and both full control and unlimited permission are not desirable. Now how can we find out the harmonious point of these two values?
    The idea of due process of law in Constitution made criminal procedure, the Bill of Rights become a "living document". The newly established Korean Constitutional Court and the Korean Supreme Court have made important decisions for such rights. However, there still remain a number of problems such as undercover and confidential informant investigation which could disturb the trim in the Constitution and overshadow the constitutional procedural rights. But in Korea the necessity of undercover and confidential informant isn't deniable like in other countries. Thus the important point is the control of undercover and confidential informant and the way of control of those must be made in accordance with due process of law in Constitution.
    So, we have to study due process of law and other principal of guarantee of human rights concerning undercover and confidential informant. And then, it will be necessary that we apply those to the legislation for criminal investigation by undercover and confidential informant with constitutionality.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 序 論
    • II. Undercover와 confidential informant의 槪念
    • III. 美國의 Undercover 및 Confidential Informant 制度
    • IV. 適法節次原理에 따른 Undercover와 Confidential informant의 統制 方案
    • V. 結論
    • I. 序 論
    • II. Undercover와 confidential informant의 槪念
    • III. 美國의 Undercover 및 Confidential Informant 制度
    • IV. 適法節次原理에 따른 Undercover와 Confidential informant의 統制 方案
    • V. 結論
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 鄭宗燮, "憲法學原論" 박영사 2008

    2 文鴻柱, "國政調査權" 19 (19): 11-,

    1 鄭宗燮, "憲法學原論" 박영사 2008

    2 文鴻柱, "國政調査權" 19 (19): 11-,

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
    2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
    영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼