RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검도지도자의 리더십유형이 임파워먼트와 직무만족에 미치는 영향 = The effect of fencing leader’s type of leadership on empowerment and satisfaction from duty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75035954

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study has the main objective on how the fencing leader’s type of leadership affects empowerment and satisfaction from duty. The 250 subjects were selected through convenient sampling method among people who are from Kyong-gi, Seoul and are currently participating in the fencing leader conference, and the actual data that were used for the analysis contained 200 surveys that were gathered after leaving out 50 surveys that were considered incomplete. In order to examine this study’s question, data were collected through surveys for leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.

      1. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on ages of the fencing leaders did not show much statistically in terms of business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.
      Business leadership depending on the ages was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. Empowerment was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. In addition, satisfaction from duty was the highest from 10 years or higher group, and the lowest from 3 years or lower group.

      2. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on teaching experience of the fencing leaders appeared in business leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.
      Business leadership depending on the teaching experience was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. Empowerment was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. In addition, satisfaction from duty was the highest from 10 years or higher group, and the lowest from 3 years or lower group.

      3. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on rank of the fencing leaders appeared in all categories including business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment and satisfaction from duty.
      Business leadership depending on the rank was the highest from rank 6 or higher group and the lowest from rank 4 or lower group. Reforming leadership was the highest from rank 6 or higher group and the lowest from rank 5 group. Empowerment was the highest from rank 6 or higher group and the lowest from rank 5 group. Satisfaction from duty was the highest from rank 5 group and the lowest from rank 4 or lower group.

      4. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on class of the fencing leaders did not show much statistically in terms of business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.
      For business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on class manager was the highest among all class groups.

      5. Business leadership shows the static correlation from reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty, while reforming leadership shows the static correlation from empowerment, and satisfaction from duty. Also empowerment shows the static correlation from satisfaction from duty.

      6. According to the analysis of the effect of business leadership on empowerment and satisfaction from duty, significant effect has been put onto business leadership from empowerment and satisfaction from duty. Also the result of the verification on model’s suitability came out with determining coefficient (R^2) of .672, so it can be known that the business leadership is related to empowerment and satisfaction from duty for 67.2%.

      7. According to the analysis of the effect of reforming leadership on empowerment and satisfaction from duty, significant effect has been put onto reforming business from empowerment and satisfaction from duty. Also the result of the verification on model’s suitability came out with determining coefficient (R^2) of .661, so it can be known that the reforming leadership is related to empowerment and satisfaction from duty for 66.1%.

      8. According to the analysis of the effect of empowerment on satisfaction from duty, significant effect has been put onto satisfaction from duty from empowerment. Also the result of the verification on model’s suitability came out with determining coefficient (R^2) of .308, so it can be known that the empowerment is related to satisfaction from duty for 30.8%.
      번역하기

      This study has the main objective on how the fencing leader’s type of leadership affects empowerment and satisfaction from duty. The 250 subjects were selected through convenient sampling method among people who are from Kyong-gi, Seoul and are curr...

      This study has the main objective on how the fencing leader’s type of leadership affects empowerment and satisfaction from duty. The 250 subjects were selected through convenient sampling method among people who are from Kyong-gi, Seoul and are currently participating in the fencing leader conference, and the actual data that were used for the analysis contained 200 surveys that were gathered after leaving out 50 surveys that were considered incomplete. In order to examine this study’s question, data were collected through surveys for leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.

      1. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on ages of the fencing leaders did not show much statistically in terms of business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.
      Business leadership depending on the ages was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. Empowerment was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. In addition, satisfaction from duty was the highest from 10 years or higher group, and the lowest from 3 years or lower group.

      2. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on teaching experience of the fencing leaders appeared in business leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.
      Business leadership depending on the teaching experience was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. Empowerment was the highest from 4 ~ 9 years group and the lowest from 3 years or lower group. In addition, satisfaction from duty was the highest from 10 years or higher group, and the lowest from 3 years or lower group.

      3. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on rank of the fencing leaders appeared in all categories including business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment and satisfaction from duty.
      Business leadership depending on the rank was the highest from rank 6 or higher group and the lowest from rank 4 or lower group. Reforming leadership was the highest from rank 6 or higher group and the lowest from rank 5 group. Empowerment was the highest from rank 6 or higher group and the lowest from rank 5 group. Satisfaction from duty was the highest from rank 5 group and the lowest from rank 4 or lower group.

      4. The difference among leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on class of the fencing leaders did not show much statistically in terms of business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty.
      For business leadership, reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty depending on class manager was the highest among all class groups.

      5. Business leadership shows the static correlation from reforming leadership, empowerment, and satisfaction from duty, while reforming leadership shows the static correlation from empowerment, and satisfaction from duty. Also empowerment shows the static correlation from satisfaction from duty.

      6. According to the analysis of the effect of business leadership on empowerment and satisfaction from duty, significant effect has been put onto business leadership from empowerment and satisfaction from duty. Also the result of the verification on model’s suitability came out with determining coefficient (R^2) of .672, so it can be known that the business leadership is related to empowerment and satisfaction from duty for 67.2%.

      7. According to the analysis of the effect of reforming leadership on empowerment and satisfaction from duty, significant effect has been put onto reforming business from empowerment and satisfaction from duty. Also the result of the verification on model’s suitability came out with determining coefficient (R^2) of .661, so it can be known that the reforming leadership is related to empowerment and satisfaction from duty for 66.1%.

      8. According to the analysis of the effect of empowerment on satisfaction from duty, significant effect has been put onto satisfaction from duty from empowerment. Also the result of the verification on model’s suitability came out with determining coefficient (R^2) of .308, so it can be known that the empowerment is related to satisfaction from duty for 30.8%.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼