EFL 상황에서의 상호작용 - 교실환경과 준자연환경의 비교 연구 = Interaction in EFL environment: Classroom setting vs. pseudo-natural setting

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  This paper investigated interaction patterns of L2 learners and their native speaker counterparts in EFL classrooms and proximal social settings. To this end, data were collected from an English cafe at a university (i.e., pseudo-natural setting) and from an English conversation class at a university (i.e., classroom setting). Data analysis focused on teachers" question types, feedback patterns, and learners" responses towards feedback. The analysis based on utterance frequency revealed that students displayed higher participation rate in the pseudo-natural settings. With regards to teacher questions, teachers used more referential questions than display questions in both settings. However, there were twice as many teachers" feedback in the pseudo-natural setting compared to the classroom setting, but the frequent feedback did not slow down the conversation and did not always lead to self-repair. In addition, students in two settings differed in terms of their preferences to feedback in different linguistic categories.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
  Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
  Ⅲ. 연구방법
  Ⅳ. 연구 결과
  Ⅴ. 논의
  Ⅵ. 결론
  참고문헌
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박광노, "초등영어수업에서의 교사와 학생간 상호작용의 유형에 관한 연구" 한양대학교 2005

2 이경민, "원어민 수업에서의 의사소통 능력 관찰 연구" 성신여자대학교 대학원 2007

3 이은주, "원어민 교사와 학습자간의 상호작용 활성화를 위한 사례연구" 숙명여자대학교 교육대학원 2004

4 이재관, "외국어 습득을 위한 학습자의 상호작용에 관한 연구: 의미협의를 중심으로" 한국교원대학교 2000

5 Pica,T., "The textual outcome of native speaker-non-native speaker negotiation: What do they reveal about second language learning? In : Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study" D. C. Heath & Co 198-237, 1992

6 Long,M.H., "The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In : Handbook of second language acquisition" Academy Press 413-468, 1996

7 Swain,M., "The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In : Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning" Lawrence Erlbaum 471-484, 2005

8 Swain,M., "The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In : Sociocultural theory and second language learning" Oxford University Press 97-114, 2000

9 Krashen,S.D., "The input hypothesis: Issues and implications" Longman 1985

10 Brock,C.A., "The effects of referential question on ESL classroom discourse" 20 (20): 47-59, 1986

11 Kim,T.E., "Teacher questioning and classroom interaction patterns in advanced EFL classes" 11 (11): 59-83, 2004

12 Chaudron,C., "Second language classroom: Research on teaching and learning" Cambridge University Press 1988

13 Braidi,S.M., "Reexaming the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions" 52 (52): 1-42, 2002

14 Brown,H.D., "Principles of language learning and teaching" Longman 2000

15 Swain,M., "Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together" 83 (83): 320-337, 1998

16 Gass,S.M., "Input, interaction, and the second language learner" Lawrence Erlbaum 1997

17 Long,M.H., "Input and second language acquisition theory. In : Input in second language acquisition" Newbury House 377-393, 1985

18 Pica,T., "Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In : Input in second language acquisition" Newbury House 115-132, 1985

19 Mackey, A., "How do learners perceive interactional feedback?" 22 : 471-498, 2000

20 Chaudron,C., "Foreigner talk in the classroom: An aid to learning?. In : Classroom oriented research in second Language acquisition" Newbury House 127-145, 1983

21 Ellis,R., "Educational Settings and Second Language Learning" 9 (9): 11-27, 2007

22 van Lier,L., "Analysing interaction in second language classrooms" 38 (38): 160-169, 1984