목구조 설계를 위한 확정론적 구조 설계법과 확률 기반 구조 설계법의 비교 연구 = Methods for wooden structural design- A comparative research between deterministic design and probability based design

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Probability based design(PBD)method has some advantages against current design methods. First, it can provide the quantitative values for the structural safety or capacity through the reliability index,. That presented the certainty on the corresponding structure for the designer or user, also that permitted the broad consideration in the safety of structures. In addition, it can give the quantitative lifetime of the related structure in the calculation process of target reliability index. Also, incidental economical efficiency can be expected because decrease of required structural material can be obtained by using the practical material data. Unlikely current deterministic structural design methods, main advantage is the reflection of real condition in the structural design process by application of the data with not small clear specimen but structural size material.
Advanced countries, namely America, Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand already converted from allowable stress design(ASD) method to PBD method and used as a standard wooden structures code in the late 1980s and 1990s. Other domestic constructions standards such as the steel or concrete constructions accepted and used the PBD methods already. Accordingly, wooden structural design method also should be converted from deterministic ASD to probabilistic LRFD(Load and resistance factor design) in order to keep pace with worldwide demands for PBD.
Hence, to suggest the reason of introduction the PBD in domestic wooden structural design and analysis, a brief example was used to show the different reliability index by using the different design methods. Definition, merits and demerits of deterministic ASD and probabilistic LRFD were followed. Also the three examples were presented to show the similarity and differences between ASD and LRFD. Finally, connection problems that might cause a disputation in wooden structural design and analysis were broadly examined.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Probability based design(PBD)method has some advantages against current design methods. First, it can provide the quantitative values for the structural safety or capacity through the reliability index,. That presented the certainty on the corresponding structure for the designer or user, also that permitted the broad consideration in the safety of structures. In addition, it can give the quantitative lifetime of the related structure in the calculation process of target reliability index. Also, incidental economical efficiency can be expected because decrease of required structural material can be obtained by using the practical material data. Unlikely current deterministic structural design methods, main advantage is the reflection of real condition in the structural design process by application of the data with not small clear specimen but structural size material.
Advanced countries, namely America, Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand already converted from allowable stress design(ASD) method to PBD method and used as a standard wooden structures code in the late 1980s and 1990s. Other domestic constructions standards such as the steel or concrete constructions accepted and used the PBD methods already. Accordingly, wooden structural design method also should be converted from deterministic ASD to probabilistic LRFD(Load and resistance factor design) in order to keep pace with worldwide demands for PBD.
Hence, to suggest the reason of introduction the PBD in domestic wooden structural design and analysis, a brief example was used to show the different reliability index by using the different design methods. Definition, merits and demerits of deterministic ASD and probabilistic LRFD were followed. Also the three examples were presented to show the similarity and differences between ASD and LRFD. Finally, connection problems that might cause a disputation in wooden structural design and analysis were broadly examined.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조효남, "확률이론에 기초한 철근콘크리트 강도설계규준" 6 (6): 53-60, 1986

2 Kenneth J.Fridley, "Wood Engineering in the 21st century:research needs and goals" 109-113, 1997

3 Keith F.Faherty, "Wood Engineering and construction handbook" McGraw-Hill,Inc 1989

4 David S.Gromala, "Wood Design Focus" 5 (5): 1994

5 Douglas R Rammer, "Wood Construction Codes Issues in the United States" 39-49, 2006

6 T. E. McLain, "Timber connection design in the U.S. converting to LRFD format" 277-285, 1991

7 Sven Thelandersson, "Timber Engineering" John Wiley & Sons, LTD 169-230, 2003

8 The building center of Japan, "The building standard law of Japan"

9 Chen Wai-Fah, "Structural Engineering Handbook" CRC Press LLC 1999

10 Bruce R. Ellingwood, "Status of reliability-based design in North America: Impact for engineered wood construction"

11 Jozsef Bodig, "Reliability-based design of engineered wood structures" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

12 Ayyub, B.M., "Reliability conditioned partial safety factors" 113 (113): 279-294, 1987

13 Robert G. Sexsmith, "Limit stats design concepts for timber engineering" 28 (28): 49-54, 1978

14 Thomas E. Mclain, "LRFD for engineered wood structures - Connention behavioral equations" 119 (119): 1993

15 Canadian Wood Council, "Introduction to wood design"

16 David S., "Implementation of Load and Resistance Factor Design in the United States" 40-47, 1996

17 Keith Crews, "Development of Limit States Design Procedures for Timber Bridges" 292-300, 1996

18 David W. Green, "Codes and standards for structural wood products and their use in the United States" 3-16, 2000