RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    확률,통계 연구에 대한 수학교육학적 고찰 -〈수학교육〉에 게재된 논문을 중심으로- = A Trend Analysis on the Educational Research of the Probability and Statistics -Focused on Papers Published in <The Mathematical Education>, the Journal of Korea Society of Mathematical Education-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30057244

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to see what the essential characteristics are in teaching probability and statistics among various mathematical fields. we also tried to connect the study of probability and statistics education with what is needed for a science be synthetic to have its own identity as a unique research field. Since we searched for the future direction of the pedagogic study in the probability and statistics we first selected paper on probability and statistics published in <The Mathematical education>(series A), the Journal of Korean Society of Mathematical Education, and establish the following research questions. What kinds of characteristics can be found when paper on probability and statistics published in <The Mathematical education>(series A) are classified into four categories; contents of probability and statistics education, research method of the mathematics education, methods of learning and teaching, and finally measurements and evaluation? We classified papers into two kinds. One is related to the educational contents, consisting of the methods of learning and teaching of the measurement and evaluation. The other is related to the methods of research, which is not a part of the educational curriculum but is essential for establishing the identity of mathematics education. According to the periods, papers on the curricular contents in 1960s were influenced by the New Mathematics, and paper on the curricular contents in 1980s were influenced by `back to basic`. In 1990s, paper on methods of learning and teaching, and measurement and evaluation were increasing in number. Besides, <The Mathematical education>(series A) from the Journal of Korea Society of Mathematical Education covers contents, methods of learning and teaching, and measurement and evaluation. And when I examined the paper on the contents of textbook of a junior high school related to the probability and statistics education and on methods of learning and teaching, I found that those papers occupy 1.84% in <The Mathematical education>. When it comes to the methods of learning and teaching, most of studies in <The Mathematical education>(series A), are about application of concrete implement like experiment and practical application of computer programs, Though this study, I found that over-all and more active researches on probability and statistics are required and that the studies about methods of learning and leaching must be made in diverse directions. It is needed that how students recognize probability and statistics, connection, communication and representation in probability and statistics context, too. <The Mathematical education>(series A), does not have papers on methods of study. Mathematics pedagogy is a mixture of various studies - mathematics psychology, mathematical philosophy, the history of mathematics and Mathematics. So If there doesn`t exist a proper method of study adequate in the situation for the mathematics education, the issue of mathematics pedagogy might be taken its own place by that of other students`. We must search for the unique method of study for mathematics education so that mathematics pedagogy has its own identity as a study. The study concerning this aspect is needed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to see what the essential characteristics are in teaching probability and statistics among various mathematical fields. we also tried to connect the study of probability and statistics education with what is needed for a s...

    The purpose of this study is to see what the essential characteristics are in teaching probability and statistics among various mathematical fields. we also tried to connect the study of probability and statistics education with what is needed for a science be synthetic to have its own identity as a unique research field. Since we searched for the future direction of the pedagogic study in the probability and statistics we first selected paper on probability and statistics published in <The Mathematical education>(series A), the Journal of Korean Society of Mathematical Education, and establish the following research questions. What kinds of characteristics can be found when paper on probability and statistics published in <The Mathematical education>(series A) are classified into four categories; contents of probability and statistics education, research method of the mathematics education, methods of learning and teaching, and finally measurements and evaluation? We classified papers into two kinds. One is related to the educational contents, consisting of the methods of learning and teaching of the measurement and evaluation. The other is related to the methods of research, which is not a part of the educational curriculum but is essential for establishing the identity of mathematics education. According to the periods, papers on the curricular contents in 1960s were influenced by the New Mathematics, and paper on the curricular contents in 1980s were influenced by `back to basic`. In 1990s, paper on methods of learning and teaching, and measurement and evaluation were increasing in number. Besides, <The Mathematical education>(series A) from the Journal of Korea Society of Mathematical Education covers contents, methods of learning and teaching, and measurement and evaluation. And when I examined the paper on the contents of textbook of a junior high school related to the probability and statistics education and on methods of learning and teaching, I found that those papers occupy 1.84% in <The Mathematical education>. When it comes to the methods of learning and teaching, most of studies in <The Mathematical education>(series A), are about application of concrete implement like experiment and practical application of computer programs, Though this study, I found that over-all and more active researches on probability and statistics are required and that the studies about methods of learning and leaching must be made in diverse directions. It is needed that how students recognize probability and statistics, connection, communication and representation in probability and statistics context, too. <The Mathematical education>(series A), does not have papers on methods of study. Mathematics pedagogy is a mixture of various studies - mathematics psychology, mathematical philosophy, the history of mathematics and Mathematics. So If there doesn`t exist a proper method of study adequate in the situation for the mathematics education, the issue of mathematics pedagogy might be taken its own place by that of other students`. We must search for the unique method of study for mathematics education so that mathematics pedagogy has its own identity as a study. The study concerning this aspect is needed.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.82 0.82 0.93
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.95 0.96 1.191 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼